Minglei Chen

Minglei Chen, Weilong Wang, Jiang Duan et al.

Parameter-efficient prompt learning has become the de facto standard for adapting Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to downstream tasks. Existing approaches predominantly focus on aligning text prompts with first-order visual features (i.e., spatial feature maps). While effective for fine-grained semantic discrimination, we argue that relying solely on first-order information is insufficient for robust adaptation, as these spatially entangled features are highly susceptible to domain shifts and local noise. In this work, we propose \textbf{Gram-Anchored Prompt Learning (GAPL)} for Vision-Language Models via Second-Order Statistics, a framework that synergizes local semantic alignment with global structural consistency. Methodologically, we introduce an additional second-order statistical stream via \textbf{Gram matrices} that augments the standard first-order spatial interaction. By anchoring prompts to these second-order priors, our approach enables language representations to dynamically adapt to statistical distribution shifts across diverse domains. Extensive experiments indicate the effectiveness of the second-order features, and show compelling performances of GAPL on various benchmarks.

Hu Wei, Ze Xu, Boyu Yang et al.

Large language models (LLMs) now perform strongly on many public math suites, yet frontier separation within mathematics increasingly suffers from ceiling effects. We present two complementary benchmarks: SKYLENAGE-ReasoningMATH, a 100-item, structure-aware diagnostic set with per-item metadata on length, numeric density, and symbolic complexity; and SKYLENAGE-MATH, a 150-item contest-style suite spanning four stages from high school to doctoral under a seven-subject taxonomy. We evaluate fifteen contemporary LLM variants under a single setup and analyze subject x model and grade x model performance. On the contest suite, the strongest model reaches 44% while the runner-up reaches 37%; accuracy declines from high school to doctoral, and top systems exhibit a doctoral-to-high-school retention near 79%. On the reasoning set, the best model attains 81% overall, and hardest-slice results reveal clear robustness gaps between leaders and the mid-tier. In summary, we release SKYLENAGE-ReasoningMATH and report aggregate results for SKYLENAGE-MATH; together, SKYLENAGE provides a hard, reasoning-centered and broadly covering math benchmark with calibrated difficulty and rich metadata, serving as a reference benchmark for future evaluations of mathematical reasoning.