Babak Naderi

Gabriel Mittag, Babak Naderi, Vishak Gopal et al.

Current state-of-the-art video quality models, such as VMAF, give excellent prediction results by comparing the degraded video with its reference video. However, they do not consider temporal distortions (e.g., frame freezes or skips) that occur during videoconferencing calls. In this paper, we present a data-driven approach for modeling such distortions automatically by training an LSTM with subjective quality ratings labeled via crowdsourcing. The videos were collected from live videoconferencing calls in 83 different network conditions. We applied QR codes as markers on the source videos to create aligned references and compute temporal features based on the alignment vectors. Using these features together with VMAF core features, our proposed model achieves a PCC of 0.99 on the validation set. Furthermore, our model outputs per-frame quality that gives detailed insight into the cause of video quality impairments. The VCM model and dataset are open-sourced at https://github.com/microsoft/Video_Call_MOS.

Salar Mohtaj, Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller et al.

Text readability assessment has a wide range of applications for different target people, from language learners to people with disabilities. The fast pace of textual content production on the web makes it impossible to measure text complexity without the benefit of machine learning and natural language processing techniques. Although various research addressed the readability assessment of English text in recent years, there is still room for improvement of the models for other languages. In this paper, we proposed a new model for text complexity assessment for German text based on transfer learning. Our results show that the model outperforms more classical solutions based on linguistic features extraction from input text. The best model is based on the BERT pre-trained language model achieved the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.483.

Babak Naderi, Ross Cutler

Talking-head videos constitute a predominant content type in real-time communication, yet publicly available datasets for video processing research in this domain remain scarce and limited in signal fidelity. In this paper, we open-source a near-raw dataset of 847 talking-head recordings (approximately 212 minutes), each 15\,s in duration, captured from 805 participants using 446 unique consumer webcam devices in their natural environments. All recordings are stored using the FFV1 lossless codec, preserving the camera-native signal -- uncompressed (24.4\%) or MJPEG-encoded (75.6\%) -- without additional lossy processing. Each recording is annotated with a Mean Opinion Score (MOS) and ten perceptual quality tokens that jointly explain 64.4\% of the MOS variance. From this corpus, we curate a stratified benchmarking subset of 120 clips in three content conditions: original, background blur, and background replacement. Codec efficiency evaluation across four datasets and four codecs, namely H.264, H.265, H.266, and AV1, yields VMAF BD-rate savings up to $-71.3\%$ (H.266) relative to H.264, with significant encoder$\times$dataset ($η_p^2 = .112$) and encoder$\times$content condition ($η_p^2 = .149$) interactions, demonstrating that both content type and background processing affect compression efficiency. The dataset offers 5$\times$ the scale of the largest prior talking-head webcam dataset (847 vs.\ 160 clips) with lossless signal fidelity, establishing a resource for training and benchmarking video compression and enhancement models in real-time communication.

Babak Naderi, Ross Cutler, Juhee Cho et al.

Super-Resolution (SR) is a critical task in computer vision, focusing on reconstructing high-resolution (HR) images from low-resolution (LR) inputs. The field has seen significant progress through various challenges, particularly in single-image SR. Video Super-Resolution (VSR) extends this to the temporal domain, aiming to enhance video quality using methods like local, uni-, bi-directional propagation, or traditional upscaling followed by restoration. This challenge addresses VSR for conferencing, where LR videos are encoded with H.265 at fixed QPs. The goal is to upscale videos by a specific factor, providing HR outputs with enhanced perceptual quality under a low-delay scenario using causal models. The challenge included three tracks: general-purpose videos, talking head videos, and screen content videos, with separate datasets provided by the organizers for training, validation, and testing. We open-sourced a new screen content dataset for the SR task in this challenge. Submissions were evaluated through subjective tests using a crowdsourced implementation of the ITU-T Rec P.910.

Ross Cutler, Babak Naderi, Vishak Gopal et al.

Photorealistic avatars are human avatars that look, move, and talk like real people. The performance of photorealistic avatars has significantly improved recently based on objective metrics such as PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, FID, and FVD. However, recent photorealistic avatar publications do not provide subjective tests of the avatars to measure human usability factors. We provide an open source test framework to subjectively measure photorealistic avatar performance in ten dimensions: realism, trust, comfortableness using, comfortableness interacting with, appropriateness for work, creepiness, formality, affinity, resemblance to the person, and emotion accuracy. Using telecommunication scenarios, we show that the correlation of nine of these subjective metrics with PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, FID, and FVD is weak, and moderate for emotion accuracy. The crowdsourced subjective test framework is highly reproducible and accurate when compared to a panel of experts. We analyze a wide range of avatars from photorealistic to cartoon-like and show that some photorealistic avatars are approaching real video performance based on these dimensions. We also find that for avatars above a certain level of realism, eight of these measured dimensions are strongly correlated. This means that avatars that are not as realistic as real video will have lower trust, comfortableness using, comfortableness interacting with, appropriateness for work, formality, and affinity, and higher creepiness compared to real video. In addition, because there is a strong linear relationship between avatar affinity and realism, there is no uncanny valley effect for photorealistic avatars in the telecommunication scenario. We suggest several extensions of this test framework for future work and discuss design implications for telecommunication systems. The test framework is available at https://github.com/microsoft/P.910.

Abrar Majeedi, Babak Naderi, Yasaman Hosseinkashi et al.

Machine learning-based video codecs have made significant progress in the past few years. A critical area in the development of ML-based video codecs is an accurate evaluation metric that does not require an expensive and slow subjective test. We show that existing evaluation metrics that were designed and trained on DSP-based video codecs are not highly correlated to subjective opinion when used with ML video codecs due to the video artifacts being quite different between ML and video codecs. We provide a new dataset of ML video codec videos that have been accurately labeled for quality. We also propose a new full reference video quality assessment (FRVQA) model that achieves a Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) of 0.99 and a Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient (SRCC) of 0.99 at the model level. We make the dataset and FRVQA model open source to help accelerate research in ML video codecs, and so that others can further improve the FRVQA model.

Gabriel Mittag, Babak Naderi, Assmaa Chehadi et al.

In this paper, we present an update to the NISQA speech quality prediction model that is focused on distortions that occur in communication networks. In contrast to the previous version, the model is trained end-to-end and the time-dependency modelling and time-pooling is achieved through a Self-Attention mechanism. Besides overall speech quality, the model also predicts the four speech quality dimensions Noisiness, Coloration, Discontinuity, and Loudness, and in this way gives more insight into the cause of a quality degradation. Furthermore, new datasets with over 13,000 speech files were created for training and validation of the model. The model was finally tested on a new, live-talking test dataset that contains recordings of real telephone calls. Overall, NISQA was trained and evaluated on 81 datasets from different sources and showed to provide reliable predictions also for unknown speech samples. The code, model weights, and datasets are open-sourced.

Babak Naderi, Ross Cutler

The quality of the speech communication systems, which include noise suppression algorithms, are typically evaluated in laboratory experiments according to the ITU-T Rec. P.835, in which participants rate background noise, speech signal, and overall quality separately. This paper introduces an open-source toolkit for conducting subjective quality evaluation of noise suppressed speech in crowdsourcing. We followed the ITU-T Rec. P.835, and P.808 and highly automate the process to prevent moderator's error. To assess the validity of our evaluation method, we compared the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS), calculate using ratings collected with our implementation, and the MOS values from a standard laboratory experiment conducted according to the ITU-T Rec P.835. Results show a high validity in all three scales namely background noise, speech signal and overall quality (average PCC = 0.961). Results of a round-robin test (N=5) showed that our implementation is also a highly reproducible evaluation method (PCC=0.99). Finally, we used our implementation in the INTERSPEECH 2021 Deep Noise Suppression Challenge as the primary evaluation metric, which demonstrates it is practical to use at scale. The results are analyzed to determine why the overall performance was the best in terms of background noise and speech quality.

Ross Cutler, Babak Naderi, Markus Loide et al.

The quality of acoustic echo cancellers (AECs) in real-time communication systems is typically evaluated using objective metrics like ERLE and PESQ, and less commonly with lab-based subjective tests like ITU-T Rec. P.831. We will show that these objective measures are not well correlated to subjective measures. We then introduce an open-source crowdsourcing approach for subjective evaluation of echo impairment which can be used to evaluate the performance of AECs. We provide a study that shows this tool is accurate and highly reproducible. This new tool has been recently used in the ICASSP 2021 AEC Challenge which made the challenge possible to do quickly and cost effectively.

Babak Naderi, Ross Cutler

The ITU-T Recommendation P.808 provides a crowdsourcing approach for conducting a subjective assessment of speech quality using the Absolute Category Rating (ACR) method. We provide an open-source implementation of the ITU-T Rec. P.808 that runs on the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. We extended our implementation to include Degradation Category Ratings (DCR) and Comparison Category Ratings (CCR) test methods. We also significantly speed up the test process by integrating the participant qualification step into the main rating task compared to a two-stage qualification and rating solution. We provide program scripts for creating and executing the subjective test, and data cleansing and analyzing the answers to avoid operational errors. To validate the implementation, we compare the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) collected through our implementation with MOS values from a standard laboratory experiment conducted based on the ITU-T Rec. P.800. We also evaluate the reproducibility of the result of the subjective speech quality assessment through crowdsourcing using our implementation. Finally, we quantify the impact of parts of the system designed to improve the reliability: environmental tests, gold and trapping questions, rating patterns, and a headset usage test.

Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller

The rank correlation coefficients and the ranked-based statistical tests (as a subset of non-parametric techniques) might be misleading when they are applied to subjectively collected opinion scores. Those techniques assume that the data is measured at least at an ordinal level and define a sequence of scores to represent a tied rank when they have precisely an equal numeric value. In this paper, we show that the definition of tied rank, as mentioned above, is not suitable for Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) and might be misleading conclusions of rank-based statistical techniques. Furthermore, we introduce a method to overcome this issue by transforming the MOS values considering their $95\%$ Confidence Intervals. The rank correlation coefficients and ranked-based statistical tests can then be safely applied to the transformed values. We also provide open-source software packages in different programming languages to utilize the application of our transformation method in the quality of experience domain.

Babak Naderi, Ross Cutler

Subjective video quality assessment (VQA) is the gold standard for measuring end-user experience across communication, streaming, and UGC pipelines. Beyond high-validity lab studies, crowdsourcing offers accurate, reliable, faster, and cheaper evaluation-but suffers from unreliable submissions by workers who ignore instructions or game rewards. Recent tests reveal sophisticated exploits of video metadata and rising use of remote-desktop (RD) connections, both of which bias results. We propose objective and subjective detectors for RD users and compare two mainstream crowdsourcing platforms on their susceptibility and mitigation under realistic test conditions and task designs.

Nicolae Catalin Ristea, Ando Saabas, Ross Cutler et al.

The ICASSP 2024 Speech Signal Improvement Grand Challenge is intended to stimulate research in the area of improving the speech signal quality in communication systems. This marks our second challenge, building upon the success from the previous ICASSP 2023 Grand Challenge. We enhance the competition by introducing a dataset synthesizer, enabling all participating teams to start at a higher baseline, an objective metric for our extended P.804 tests, transcripts for the 2023 test set, and we add Word Accuracy (WAcc) as a metric. We evaluate a total of 13 systems in the real-time track and 11 systems in the non-real-time track using both subjective P.804 and objective Word Accuracy metrics.

Gabriel Mittag, Saman Zadtootaghaj, Thilo Michael et al.

The ground truth used for training image, video, or speech quality prediction models is based on the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) obtained from subjective experiments. Usually, it is necessary to conduct multiple experiments, mostly with different test participants, to obtain enough data to train quality models based on machine learning. Each of these experiments is subject to an experiment-specific bias, where the rating of the same file may be substantially different in two experiments (e.g. depending on the overall quality distribution). These different ratings for the same distortion levels confuse neural networks during training and lead to lower performance. To overcome this problem, we propose a bias-aware loss function that estimates each dataset's biases during training with a linear function and considers it while optimising the network weights. We prove the efficiency of the proposed method by training and validating quality prediction models on synthetic and subjective image and speech quality datasets.

Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller, Ross Cutler

Traditionally, Quality of Experience (QoE) for a communication system is evaluated through a subjective test. The most common test method for speech QoE is the Absolute Category Rating (ACR), in which participants listen to a set of stimuli, processed by the underlying test conditions, and rate their perceived quality for each stimulus on a specific scale. The Comparison Category Rating (CCR) is another standard approach in which participants listen to both reference and processed stimuli and rate their quality compared to the other one. The CCR method is particularly suitable for systems that improve the quality of input speech. This paper evaluates an adaptation of the CCR test procedure for assessing speech quality in the crowdsourcing set-up. The CCR method was introduced in the ITU-T Rec. P.800 for laboratory-based experiments. We adapted the test for the crowdsourcing approach following the guidelines from ITU-T Rec. P.800 and P.808. We show that the results of the CCR procedure via crowdsourcing are highly reproducible. We also compared the CCR test results with widely used ACR test procedures obtained in the laboratory and crowdsourcing. Our results show that the CCR procedure in crowdsourcing is a reliable and valid test method.

Babak Naderi, Gabriel Mittag, Rafael Zequeira Jim\a'enez et al.

Speech communication systems based on Voice-over-IP technology are frequently used by native as well as non-native speakers of a target language, e.g. in international phone calls or telemeetings. Frequently, such calls also occur in a noisy environment, making noise suppression modules necessary to increase perceived quality of experience. Whereas standard tests for assessing perceived quality make use of native listeners, we assume that noise-reduced speech and residual noise may affect native and non-native listeners of a target language in different ways. To test this assumption, we report results of two subjective tests conducted with English and German native listeners who judge the quality of speech samples recorded by native English, German, and Mandarin speakers, which are degraded with different background noise levels and noise suppression effects. The experiments were conducted following the standardized ITU-T Rec. P.835 approach, however implemented in a crowdsourcing setting according to ITU-T Rec. P.808. Our results show a significant influence of language on speech signal ratings and, consequently, on the overall perceived quality in specific conditions.

Andrew Perkis, Christian Timmerer, Sabina Baraković et al.

With the coming of age of virtual/augmented reality and interactive media, numerous definitions, frameworks, and models of immersion have emerged across different fields ranging from computer graphics to literary works. Immersion is oftentimes used interchangeably with presence as both concepts are closely related. However, there are noticeable interdisciplinary differences regarding definitions, scope, and constituents that are required to be addressed so that a coherent understanding of the concepts can be achieved. Such consensus is vital for paving the directionality of the future of immersive media experiences (IMEx) and all related matters. The aim of this white paper is to provide a survey of definitions of immersion and presence which leads to a definition of immersive media experience (IMEx). The Quality of Experience (QoE) for immersive media is described by establishing a relationship between the concepts of QoE and IMEx followed by application areas of immersive media experience. Influencing factors on immersive media experience are elaborated as well as the assessment of immersive media experience. Finally, standardization activities related to IMEx are highlighted and the white paper is concluded with an outlook related to future developments.

Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller

Crowdsourcing micro-task platforms facilitate subjective media quality assessment by providing access to a highly scale-able, geographically distributed and demographically diverse pool of crowd workers. Those workers participate in the experiment remotely from their own working environment, using their own hardware. In the case of speech quality assessment, preliminary work showed that environmental noise at the listener's side and the listening device (loudspeaker or headphone) significantly affect perceived quality, and consequently the reliability and validity of subjective ratings. As a consequence, ITU-T Rec. P.808 specifies requirements for the listening environment of crowd workers when assessing speech quality. In this paper, we propose a new Just Noticeable Difference of Quality (JNDQ) test as a remote screening method for assessing the suitability of the work environment for participating in speech quality assessment tasks. In a laboratory experiment, participants performed this JNDQ test with different listening devices in different listening environments, including a silent room according to ITU-T Rec. P.800 and a simulated background noise scenario. Results show a significant impact of the environment and the listening device on the JNDQ threshold. Thus, the combination of listening device and background noise needs to be screened in a crowdsourcing speech quality test. We propose a minimum threshold of our JNDQ test as an easily applicable screening method for this purpose.

Babak Naderi, Tobias Hossfeld, Matthias Hirth et al.

The subjective quality of transmitted speech is traditionally assessed in a controlled laboratory environment according to ITU-T Rec. P.800. In turn, with crowdsourcing, crowdworkers participate in a subjective online experiment using their own listening device, and in their own working environment. Despite such less controllable conditions, the increased use of crowdsourcing micro-task platforms for quality assessment tasks has pushed a high demand for standardized methods, resulting in ITU-T Rec. P.808. This work investigates the impact of the number of judgments on the reliability and the validity of quality ratings collected through crowdsourcing-based speech quality assessments, as an input to ITU-T Rec. P.808 . Three crowdsourcing experiments on different platforms were conducted to evaluate the overall quality of three different speech datasets, using the Absolute Category Rating procedure. For each dataset, the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) are calculated using differing numbers of crowdsourcing judgements. Then the results are compared to MOS values collected in a standard laboratory experiment, to assess the validity of crowdsourcing approach as a function of number of votes. In addition, the reliability of the average scores is analyzed by checking inter-rater reliability, gain in certainty, and the confidence of the MOS. The results provide a suggestion on the required number of votes per condition, and allow to model its impact on validity and reliability.

Babak Naderi, Salar Mohtaj, Kaspar Ensikat et al.

This paper presents TextComplexityDE, a dataset consisting of 1000 sentences in German language taken from 23 Wikipedia articles in 3 different article-genres to be used for developing text-complexity predictor models and automatic text simplification in German language. The dataset includes subjective assessment of different text-complexity aspects provided by German learners in level A and B. In addition, it contains manual simplification of 250 of those sentences provided by native speakers and subjective assessment of the simplified sentences by participants from the target group. The subjective ratings were collected using both laboratory studies and crowdsourcing approach.