Leonardo Placidi

Luca Franco, Leonardo Placidi, Francesco Giuliari et al.

Transformer Networks have established themselves as the de-facto state-of-the-art for trajectory forecasting but there is currently no systematic study on their capability to model the motion patterns of people, without interactions with other individuals nor the social context. This paper proposes the first in-depth study of Transformer Networks (TF) and Bidirectional Transformers (BERT) for the forecasting of the individual motion of people, without bells and whistles. We conduct an exhaustive evaluation of input/output representations, problem formulations and sequence modeling, including a novel analysis of their capability to predict multi-modal futures. Out of comparative evaluation on the ETH+UCY benchmark, both TF and BERT are top performers in predicting individual motions, definitely overcoming RNNs and LSTMs. Furthermore, they remain within a narrow margin wrt more complex techniques, which include both social interactions and scene contexts. Source code will be released for all conducted experiments.

Leonardo Placidi, Ryuichiro Hataya, Toshio Mori et al.

We introduce the first large-scale dataset, MNISQ, for both the Quantum and the Classical Machine Learning community during the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum era. MNISQ consists of 4,950,000 data points organized in 9 subdatasets. Building our dataset from the quantum encoding of classical information (e.g., MNIST dataset), we deliver a dataset in a dual form: in quantum form, as circuits, and in classical form, as quantum circuit descriptions (quantum programming language, QASM). In fact, also the Machine Learning research related to quantum computers undertakes a dual challenge: enhancing machine learning exploiting the power of quantum computers, while also leveraging state-of-the-art classical machine learning methodologies to help the advancement of quantum computing. Therefore, we perform circuit classification on our dataset, tackling the task with both quantum and classical models. In the quantum endeavor, we test our circuit dataset with Quantum Kernel methods, and we show excellent results up to $97\%$ accuracy. In the classical world, the underlying quantum mechanical structures within the quantum circuit data are not trivial. Nevertheless, we test our dataset on three classical models: Structured State Space sequence model (S4), Transformer and LSTM. In particular, the S4 model applied on the tokenized QASM sequences reaches an impressive $77\%$ accuracy. These findings illustrate that quantum circuit-related datasets are likely to be quantum advantageous, but also that state-of-the-art machine learning methodologies can competently classify and recognize quantum circuits. We finally entrust the quantum and classical machine learning community the fundamental challenge to build more quantum-classical datasets like ours and to build future benchmarks from our experiments. The dataset is accessible on GitHub and its circuits are easily run in qulacs or qiskit.

Leonardo Placidi, Ifan Williams, Enrico Rinaldi et al.

We present a systematic investigation of deep learning methods applied to quantum error mitigation of noisy output probability distributions from measured quantum circuits. We compare different architectures, from fully connected neural networks to transformers, and we test different design/training modalities, identifying sequence-to-sequence, attention-based models as the most effective on our datasets. These models consistently produce mitigated distributions that are closer to the ideal outputs when tested on both simulated and real device data obtained from IBM superconducting quantum processing units (QPU) up to five qubits. Across several different circuit depths, our approach outperforms other baseline error mitigation techniques. We perform a series of ablation studies to examine: how different input features (circuit, device properties, noisy output statistics) affect performance; cross-dataset generalization across circuit families; and transfer learning to a different IBM QPU. We observe that generalization performance across similar devices with the same architecture works effectively, without needing to fully retrain models.

Chen-Yu Liu, Leonardo Placidi, Eric Brunner et al.

We propose a Correlation-Complexity Map as a practical diagnostic tool for determining when real-world data distributions are structurally aligned with IQP-type quantum generative models. Characterized by two complementary indicators: (i) a Quantum Correlation-Likeness Indicator (QCLI), computed from the dataset's correlation-order (Walsh-Hadamard/Fourier) power spectrum aggregated by interaction order and quantified via Jensen-Shannon divergence from an i.i.d. binomial reference; and (ii) a Classical Correlation-Complexity Indicator (CCI), defined as the fraction of total correlation not captured by the optimal Chow-Liu tree approximation, normalized by total correlation. We provide theoretical support by relating QCLI to a support-mismatch mechanism, for fixed-architecture IQP families trained with an MMD objective, higher QCLI implies a smaller irreducible approximation floor. Using the map, we identify the classical turbulence data as both IQP-compatible and classically complex (high QCLI/high CCI). Guided by this placement, we use an invertible float-to-bitstring representation and a latent-parameter adaptation scheme that reuses a compact IQP circuit over a temporal sequence by learning and interpolating a low-dimensional latent trajectory. In comparative evaluations against classical models such as Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) and Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks (DCGAN), the IQP approach achieves competitive distributional alignment while using substantially fewer training snapshots and a small latent block, supporting the use of QCLI/CCI as practical indicators for locating IQP-aligned domains and advancing generative quantum utility.

Chen-Yu Liu, Leonardo Placidi, Kuan-Cheng Chen et al.

Quantum machine learning (QML) models conventionally rely on repeated measurements (shots) of observables to obtain reliable predictions. This dependence on large shot budgets leads to high inference cost and time overhead, which is particularly problematic as quantum hardware access is typically priced proportionally to the number of shots. In this work we propose You Only Measure Once (Yomo), a simple yet effective design that achieves accurate inference with dramatically fewer measurements, down to the single-shot regime. Yomo replaces Pauli expectation-value outputs with a probability aggregation mechanism and introduces loss functions that encourage sharp predictions. Our theoretical analysis shows that Yomo avoids the shot-scaling limitations inherent to expectation-based models, and our experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 confirm that Yomo consistently outperforms baselines across different shot budgets and under simulations with depolarizing channels. By enabling accurate single-shot inference, Yomo substantially reduces the financial and computational costs of deploying QML, thereby lowering the barrier to practical adoption of QML.