Ole A. Andreassen

h-index157
2papers
152,991citations

2 Papers

5.3IVDec 5, 2023Code
Learning Cortical Anomaly through Masked Encoding for Unsupervised Heterogeneity Mapping

Hao-Chun Yang, Ole Andreassen, Lars Tjelta Westlye et al.

The detection of heterogeneous mental disorders based on brain readouts remains challenging due to the complexity of symptoms and the absence of reliable biomarkers. This paper introduces CAM (Cortical Anomaly Detection through Masked Image Modeling), a novel self-supervised framework designed for the unsupervised detection of complex brain disorders using cortical surface features. We employ this framework for the detection of individuals on the psychotic spectrum and demonstrate its capabilities compared to state-of-the-art methods, achieving an AUC of 0.696 for Schizoaffective and 0.769 for Schizophreniform, without the need for any labels. Furthermore, the analysis of atypical cortical regions, including Pars Triangularis and several frontal areas often implicated in schizophrenia, provides further confidence in our approach. Altogether, we demonstrate a scalable approach for anomaly detection of complex brain disorders based on cortical abnormalities. The code will be made available at https://github.com/chadHGY/CAM.

3.8MLMay 25, 2020Code
Hierarchical Bayesian Regression for Multi-Site Normative Modeling of Neuroimaging Data

Seyed Mostafa Kia, Hester Huijsdens, Richard Dinga et al.

Clinical neuroimaging has recently witnessed explosive growth in data availability which brings studying heterogeneity in clinical cohorts to the spotlight. Normative modeling is an emerging statistical tool for achieving this objective. However, its application remains technically challenging due to difficulties in properly dealing with nuisance variation, for example due to variability in image acquisition devices. Here, in a fully probabilistic framework, we propose an application of hierarchical Bayesian regression (HBR) for multi-site normative modeling. Our experimental results confirm the superiority of HBR in deriving more accurate normative ranges on large multi-site neuroimaging data compared to widely used methods. This provides the possibility i) to learn the normative range of structural and functional brain measures on large multi-site data; ii) to recalibrate and reuse the learned model on local small data; therefore, HBR closes the technical loop for applying normative modeling as a medical tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of mental disorders.