Junfan Li

Junfan Li, Shizhong Liao

In this paper, we improve the kernel alignment regret bound for online kernel learning in the regime of the Hinge loss function. Previous algorithm achieves a regret of $O((\mathcal{A}_TT\ln{T})^{\frac{1}{4}})$ at a computational complexity (space and per-round time) of $O(\sqrt{\mathcal{A}_TT\ln{T}})$, where $\mathcal{A}_T$ is called \textit{kernel alignment}. We propose an algorithm whose regret bound and computational complexity are better than previous results. Our results depend on the decay rate of eigenvalues of the kernel matrix. If the eigenvalues of the kernel matrix decay exponentially, then our algorithm enjoys a regret of $O(\sqrt{\mathcal{A}_T})$ at a computational complexity of $O(\ln^2{T})$. Otherwise, our algorithm enjoys a regret of $O((\mathcal{A}_TT)^{\frac{1}{4}})$ at a computational complexity of $O(\sqrt{\mathcal{A}_TT})$. We extend our algorithm to batch learning and obtain a $O(\frac{1}{T}\sqrt{\mathbb{E}[\mathcal{A}_T]})$ excess risk bound which improves the previous $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ bound.

Zongbo Han, Jialong Yang, Guangyu Wang et al.

Vision-language foundation models (VLMs), such as CLIP, exhibit remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks. However, deploying these models can be unreliable when significant distribution gaps exist between training and test data, while fine-tuning for diverse scenarios is often costly. Cache-based test-time adapters offer an efficient alternative by storing representative test samples to guide subsequent classifications. Yet, these methods typically employ naive cache management with limited capacity, leading to severe catastrophic forgetting when samples are inevitably dropped during updates. In this paper, we propose DOTA (DistributiOnal Test-time Adaptation), a simple yet effective method addressing this limitation. Crucially, instead of merely memorizing individual test samples, DOTA continuously estimates the underlying distribution of the test data stream. Test-time posterior probabilities are then computed using these dynamically estimated distributions via Bayes' theorem for adaptation. This distribution-centric approach enables the model to continually learn and adapt to the deployment environment. Extensive experiments validate that DOTA significantly mitigates forgetting and achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to existing methods.

Junfan Li, Shizhong Liao

The trade-off between regret and computational cost is a fundamental problem for online kernel regression, and previous algorithms worked on the trade-off can not keep optimal regret bounds at a sublinear computational complexity. In this paper, we propose two new algorithms, AOGD-ALD and NONS-ALD, which can keep nearly optimal regret bounds at a sublinear computational complexity, and give sufficient conditions under which our algorithms work. Both algorithms dynamically maintain a group of nearly orthogonal basis used to approximate the kernel mapping, and keep nearly optimal regret bounds by controlling the approximate error. The number of basis depends on the approximate error and the decay rate of eigenvalues of the kernel matrix. If the eigenvalues decay exponentially, then AOGD-ALD and NONS-ALD separately achieves a regret of $O(\sqrt{L(f)})$ and $O(\mathrm{d}_{\mathrm{eff}}(μ)\ln{T})$ at a computational complexity in $O(\ln^2{T})$. If the eigenvalues decay polynomially with degree $p\geq 1$, then our algorithms keep the same regret bounds at a computational complexity in $o(T)$ in the case of $p>4$ and $p\geq 10$, respectively. $L(f)$ is the cumulative losses of $f$ and $\mathrm{d}_{\mathrm{eff}}(μ)$ is the effective dimension of the problem. The two regret bounds are nearly optimal and are not comparable.

Junfan Li, Shizhong Liao

In this paper, we improve the regret bound for online kernel selection under bandit feedback. Previous algorithm enjoys a $O((\Vert f\Vert^2_{\mathcal{H}_i}+1)K^{\frac{1}{3}}T^{\frac{2}{3}})$ expected bound for Lipschitz loss functions. We prove two types of regret bounds improving the previous bound. For smooth loss functions, we propose an algorithm with a $O(U^{\frac{2}{3}}K^{-\frac{1}{3}}(\sum^K_{i=1}L_T(f^\ast_i))^{\frac{2}{3}})$ expected bound where $L_T(f^\ast_i)$ is the cumulative losses of optimal hypothesis in $\mathbb{H}_{i}=\{f\in\mathcal{H}_i:\Vert f\Vert_{\mathcal{H}_i}\leq U\}$. The data-dependent bound keeps the previous worst-case bound and is smaller if most of candidate kernels match well with the data. For Lipschitz loss functions, we propose an algorithm with a $O(U\sqrt{KT}\ln^{\frac{2}{3}}{T})$ expected bound asymptotically improving the previous bound. We apply the two algorithms to online kernel selection with time constraint and prove new regret bounds matching or improving the previous $O(\sqrt{T\ln{K}} +\Vert f\Vert^2_{\mathcal{H}_i}\max\{\sqrt{T},\frac{T}{\sqrt{\mathcal{R}}}\})$ expected bound where $\mathcal{R}$ is the time budget. Finally, we empirically verify our algorithms on online regression and classification tasks.

Junfan Li, Zheshun Wu, Zenglin Xu et al.

We consider online model selection with decentralized data over $M$ clients, and study the necessity of collaboration among clients. Previous work proposed various federated algorithms without demonstrating their necessity,while we answer the question from a novel perspective of computational constraints. We prove lower bounds on the regret, and propose a federated algorithm and analyze the upper bound.Our results show (i) collaboration is unnecessary in the absence of computational constraints on clients; (ii) collaboration is necessary if the computational cost on each client is limited to $o(K)$, where $K$ is the number of candidate hypothesis spaces. We clarify the unnecessary nature of collaboration in previous federated algorithms for distributed online multi-kernel learning,and improve the regret bounds at a smaller computational and communication cost. Our algorithm relies on three new techniques including an improved Bernstein's inequality for martingale, a federated online mirror descent framework, and decoupling model selection and prediction, which might be of independent interest.