Trang Tran

CL
h-index9
7papers
194citations
Novelty41%
AI Score29

7 Papers

16.3SDJul 26, 2024
SLIM: Style-Linguistics Mismatch Model for Generalized Audio Deepfake Detection

Yi Zhu, Surya Koppisetti, Trang Tran et al. · uw

Audio deepfake detection (ADD) is crucial to combat the misuse of speech synthesized from generative AI models. Existing ADD models suffer from generalization issues, with a large performance discrepancy between in-domain and out-of-domain data. Moreover, the black-box nature of existing models limits their use in real-world scenarios, where explanations are required for model decisions. To alleviate these issues, we introduce a new ADD model that explicitly uses the StyleLInguistics Mismatch (SLIM) in fake speech to separate them from real speech. SLIM first employs self-supervised pretraining on only real samples to learn the style-linguistics dependency in the real class. The learned features are then used in complement with standard pretrained acoustic features (e.g., Wav2vec) to learn a classifier on the real and fake classes. When the feature encoders are frozen, SLIM outperforms benchmark methods on out-of-domain datasets while achieving competitive results on in-domain data. The features learned by SLIM allow us to quantify the (mis)match between style and linguistic content in a sample, hence facilitating an explanation of the model decision.

1.4CLJun 14, 2021Code
Assessing the Use of Prosody in Constituency Parsing of Imperfect Transcripts

Trang Tran, Mari Ostendorf

This work explores constituency parsing on automatically recognized transcripts of conversational speech. The neural parser is based on a sentence encoder that leverages word vectors contextualized with prosodic features, jointly learning prosodic feature extraction with parsing. We assess the utility of the prosody in parsing on imperfect transcripts, i.e. transcripts with automatic speech recognition (ASR) errors, by applying the parser in an N-best reranking framework. In experiments on Switchboard, we obtain 13-15% of the oracle N-best gain relative to parsing the 1-best ASR output, with insignificant impact on word recognition error rate. Prosody provides a significant part of the gain, and analyses suggest that it leads to more grammatical utterances via recovering function words.

0.7CLOct 8, 2020
Analysis of Disfluency in Children's Speech

Trang Tran, Morgan Tinkler, Gary Yeung et al.

Disfluencies are prevalent in spontaneous speech, as shown in many studies of adult speech. Less is understood about children's speech, especially in pre-school children who are still developing their language skills. We present a novel dataset with annotated disfluencies of spontaneous explanations from 26 children (ages 5--8), interviewed twice over a year-long period. Our preliminary analysis reveals significant differences between children's speech in our corpus and adult spontaneous speech from two corpora (Switchboard and CallHome). Children have higher disfluency and filler rates, tend to use nasal filled pauses more frequently, and on average exhibit longer reparandums than repairs, in contrast to adult speakers. Despite the differences, an automatic disfluency detection system trained on adult (Switchboard) speech transcripts performs reasonably well on children's speech, achieving an F1 score that is 10\% higher than the score on an adult out-of-domain dataset (CallHome).

2.0CLOct 8, 2020
On the Role of Style in Parsing Speech with Neural Models

Trang Tran, Jiahong Yuan, Yang Liu et al.

The differences in written text and conversational speech are substantial; previous parsers trained on treebanked text have given very poor results on spontaneous speech. For spoken language, the mismatch in style also extends to prosodic cues, though it is less well understood. This paper re-examines the use of written text in parsing speech in the context of recent advances in neural language processing. We show that neural approaches facilitate using written text to improve parsing of spontaneous speech, and that prosody further improves over this state-of-the-art result. Further, we find an asymmetric degradation from read vs. spontaneous mismatch, with spontaneous speech more generally useful for training parsers.

2.7CLApr 8, 2019
Disfluencies and Human Speech Transcription Errors

Vicky Zayats, Trang Tran, Richard Wright et al.

This paper explores contexts associated with errors in transcrip-tion of spontaneous speech, shedding light on human perceptionof disfluencies and other conversational speech phenomena. Anew version of the Switchboard corpus is provided with disfluency annotations for careful speech transcripts, together with results showing the impact of transcription errors on evaluation of automatic disfluency detection.

9.9CLApr 24, 2017Code
Parsing Speech: A Neural Approach to Integrating Lexical and Acoustic-Prosodic Information

Trang Tran, Shubham Toshniwal, Mohit Bansal et al.

In conversational speech, the acoustic signal provides cues that help listeners disambiguate difficult parses. For automatically parsing spoken utterances, we introduce a model that integrates transcribed text and acoustic-prosodic features using a convolutional neural network over energy and pitch trajectories coupled with an attention-based recurrent neural network that accepts text and prosodic features. We find that different types of acoustic-prosodic features are individually helpful, and together give statistically significant improvements in parse and disfluency detection F1 scores over a strong text-only baseline. For this study with known sentence boundaries, error analyses show that the main benefit of acoustic-prosodic features is in sentences with disfluencies, attachment decisions are most improved, and transcription errors obscure gains from prosody.

13.3CLSep 15, 2016
Characterizing the Language of Online Communities and its Relation to Community Reception

Trang Tran, Mari Ostendorf

This work investigates style and topic aspects of language in online communities: looking at both utility as an identifier of the community and correlation with community reception of content. Style is characterized using a hybrid word and part-of-speech tag n-gram language model, while topic is represented using Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Experiments with several Reddit forums show that style is a better indicator of community identity than topic, even for communities organized around specific topics. Further, there is a positive correlation between the community reception to a contribution and the style similarity to that community, but not so for topic similarity.