RODec 3, 2025Code
Cross-embodied Co-design for Dexterous HandsKehlani Fay, Darin Anthony Djapri, Anya Zorin et al.
Dexterous manipulation is limited by both control and design, without consensus as to what makes manipulators best for performing dexterous tasks. This raises a fundamental challenge: how should we design and control robot manipulators that are optimized for dexterity? We present a co-design framework that learns task-specific hand morphology and complementary dexterous control policies. The framework supports 1) an expansive morphology search space including joint, finger, and palm generation, 2) scalable evaluation across the wide design space via morphology-conditioned cross-embodied control, and 3) real-world fabrication with accessible components. We evaluate the approach across multiple dexterous tasks, including in-hand rotation with simulation and real deployment. Our framework enables an end-to-end pipeline that can design, train, fabricate, and deploy a new robotic hand in under 24 hours. The full framework will be open-sourced and available on our website.
ROJul 11, 2024
Data-driven Model Reduction for Soft Robots via Lagrangian Operator InferenceHarsh Sharma, Iman Adibnazari, Jacobo Cervera-Torralba et al.
Data-driven model reduction methods provide a nonintrusive way of constructing computationally efficient surrogates of high-fidelity models for real-time control of soft robots. This work leverages the Lagrangian nature of the model equations to derive structure-preserving linear reduced-order models via Lagrangian Operator Inference and compares their performance with prominent linear model reduction techniques through an anguilliform swimming soft robot model example with 231,336 degrees of freedom. The case studies demonstrate that preserving the underlying Lagrangian structure leads to learned models with higher predictive accuracy and robustness to unseen inputs.
62.0ROMay 21
TacO: Benchmarking Tactile Sensors for Object ManipulationAnya Zorin, Zilin Si, Myungsun Park et al.
Vision-based learning from demonstrations has achieved remarkable success in enabling robots to perform manipulation tasks and high-level semantic reasoning, yet it remains insufficient for complex, contact-rich manipulation. While there is broad agreement that tactile sensing improves manipulation, there is no empirical guidance on which tactile sensors are best suited for which manipulation tasks. In this paper, we provide a systematic, task-driven evaluation of tactile sensors for robot manipulation and propose a framework for selecting and evaluating sensors based on manipulation policy performance. Separate manipulation policies are trained for tactile sensors of four distinct modalities: visual, acoustic, magnetic, and resistive, across three tasks: pick-and-place with unknown mass, object reorientation, and plug insertion. For each task, an analysis of how sensor properties such as spatial resolution, shear sensing, and tactile representation, and the inherent material friction affect task performances is done. Rather than tactile sensing being universally beneficial in the same way, our results show that the usefulness of tactile information depends strongly on sensor modality, material properties, and the specific manipulation tasks. All of the tactile sensors, code, data, and hardware setup will be publicly available on the project website.
LGSep 18, 2023
Actively Learning Reinforcement Learning: A Stochastic Optimal Control ApproachMohammad S. Ramadan, Mahmoud A. Hayajnh, Michael T. Tolley et al.
In this paper we propose a framework towards achieving two intertwined objectives: (i) equipping reinforcement learning with active exploration and deliberate information gathering, such that it regulates state and parameter uncertainties resulting from modeling mismatches and noisy sensory; and (ii) overcoming the computational intractability of stochastic optimal control. We approach both objectives by using reinforcement learning to compute the stochastic optimal control law. On one hand, we avoid the curse of dimensionality prohibiting the direct solution of the stochastic dynamic programming equation. On the other hand, the resulting stochastic optimal control reinforcement learning agent admits caution and probing, that is, optimal online exploration and exploitation. Unlike fixed exploration and exploitation balance, caution and probing are employed automatically by the controller in real-time, even after the learning process is terminated. We conclude the paper with a numerical simulation, illustrating how a Linear Quadratic Regulator with the certainty equivalence assumption may lead to poor performance and filter divergence, while our proposed approach is stabilizing, of an acceptable performance, and computationally convenient.