Rahul Nandakumar

Rahul Nandakumar, Deepayan Chakrabarti

Given two GNNs that output node embeddings, how can we determine if they were trained independently? An adversary could have trained one GNN specifically to mimic the other GNN's embeddings. To obscure this relationship between the GNNs, the adversarial GNN might then transform its output embeddings. The two GNNs could have different architectures, weights, and embedding dimensions, and the adversary can transform the embeddings. Despite these stringent conditions, our algorithm (named CopyCop) can identify such copycat GNNs, unlike existing watermarking and fingerprinting methods. We also provide theoretical guarantees for CopyCop. Finally, experiments on 14 datasets and 5 GNN architectures demonstrate that CopyCop is accurate and robust against a broad class of adversarial attacks and transformations. Code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CopyCop-Graph-Ownership-Verification-8143/README.md

Rahul Nandakumar, Ben Fauber, Deepayan Chakrabarti

Drug discovery seeks molecules (ligands) that bind strongly and selectively to a target protein. However, fewer than 5% of candidate ligands pass the bar for even the early stages of drug discovery. Furthermore, we want methods that work for novel proteins for which we have no prior data. Starting from scratch, we have to iteratively select and test candidate ligands such that we find enough ligands of the desired quality in as few tests as possible. Our proposed algorithm, named SPADE, introduces a novel approach to ligand selection that requires only 40 tests on average to find 10 high-quality ligands. In one-vs-one comparisons, SPADE outperforms deep learning and Bayesian optimization methods on more proteins, achieving median improvements of 7%-32% in sample efficiency. SPADE is also 10x faster than its closest competitor at scoring candidate drugs. Dataset and code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SPADE_Fast_Drug_Discovery_by_Learning_from_Sparse_Data-F028/README.md

Rahul Nandakumar, Deepayan Chakrabarti

Given a set of graphs from some unknown family, we want to generate new graphs from that family. Recent methods use diffusion on either graph embeddings or the discrete space of nodes and edges. However, simple changes to embeddings (say, adding noise) can mean uninterpretable changes in the graph. In discrete-space diffusion, each step may add or remove many nodes/edges. It is hard to predict what graph patterns we will observe after many diffusion steps. Our proposed method, called GraphWeave, takes a different approach. We separate pattern generation and graph construction. To find patterns in the training graphs, we see how they transform vectors during random walks. We then generate new graphs in two steps. First, we generate realistic random walk "trajectories" which match the learned patterns. Then, we find the optimal graph that fits these trajectories. The optimization infers all edges jointly, which improves robustness to errors. On four simulated and five real-world benchmark datasets, GraphWeave outperforms existing methods. The most significant differences are on large-scale graph structures such as PageRank, cuts, communities, degree distributions, and flows. GraphWeave is also 10x faster than its closest competitor. Finally, GraphWeave is simple, needing only a transformer and standard optimizers.