Sayanta Adhikari

CV
h-index17
3papers
4citations
Novelty50%
AI Score40

3 Papers

8.6CVJun 3
Formal Concept Lattices are Good Semantic Scaffolds for Concept-Based Learning

Deepika SN Vemuri, Sayanta Adhikari, Ankit Saha et al.

Learning semantics is essential for deep learning models to be interpretable and better aligned with human reasoning. Concept-based models approach this by representing classes through meaningful semantic abstractions, but typically treat all concepts as a flat, unstructured set learned at a single neural network layer. This overlooks a fundamental property of human semantic understanding: concepts being organized hierarchically, from general to specific. While deep networks do learn a hierarchy of visual features, this structure is rarely aligned with explicit semantic hierarchies. Drawing on Formal Concept Analysis, we demonstrate that formal concept lattices provide principled semantic scaffolds to guide neural network learning. These lattices naturally identify where in the network concepts should be learned based on their level of generality. This allows the model to develop staged, semantically grounded representations throughout its depth. Empirical results on real-world datasets show that our models produce more interpretable embeddings, support more effective interventions, and learn concept representations that are both meaningful and hierarchically structured.

LGSep 22, 2025
An Unlearning Framework for Continual Learning

Sayanta Adhikari, Vishnuprasadh Kumaravelu, P. K. Srijith

Growing concerns surrounding AI safety and data privacy have driven the development of Machine Unlearning as a potential solution. However, current machine unlearning algorithms are designed to complement the offline training paradigm. The emergence of the Continual Learning (CL) paradigm promises incremental model updates, enabling models to learn new tasks sequentially. Naturally, some of those tasks may need to be unlearned to address safety or privacy concerns that might arise. We find that applying conventional unlearning algorithms in continual learning environments creates two critical problems: performance degradation on retained tasks and task relapse, where previously unlearned tasks resurface during subsequent learning. Furthermore, most unlearning algorithms require data to operate, which conflicts with CL's philosophy of discarding past data. A clear need arises for unlearning algorithms that are data-free and mindful of future learning. To that end, we propose UnCLe, an Unlearning framework for Continual Learning. UnCLe employs a hypernetwork that learns to generate task-specific network parameters, using task embeddings. Tasks are unlearned by aligning the corresponding generated network parameters with noise, without requiring any data. Empirical evaluations on several vision data sets demonstrate UnCLe's ability to sequentially perform multiple learning and unlearning operations with minimal disruption to previously acquired knowledge.

CVNov 5, 2024
Lost in Context: The Influence of Context on Feature Attribution Methods for Object Recognition

Sayanta Adhikari, Rishav Kumar, Konda Reddy Mopuri et al.

Contextual information plays a critical role in object recognition models within computer vision, where changes in context can significantly affect accuracy, underscoring models' dependence on contextual cues. This study investigates how context manipulation influences both model accuracy and feature attribution, providing insights into the reliance of object recognition models on contextual information as understood through the lens of feature attribution methods. We employ a range of feature attribution techniques to decipher the reliance of deep neural networks on context in object recognition tasks. Using the ImageNet-9 and our curated ImageNet-CS datasets, we conduct experiments to evaluate the impact of contextual variations, analyzed through feature attribution methods. Our findings reveal several key insights: (a) Correctly classified images predominantly emphasize object volume attribution over context volume attribution. (b) The dependence on context remains relatively stable across different context modifications, irrespective of classification accuracy. (c) Context change exerts a more pronounced effect on model performance than Context perturbations. (d) Surprisingly, context attribution in `no-information' scenarios is non-trivial. Our research moves beyond traditional methods by assessing the implications of broad-level modifications on object recognition, either in the object or its context.