Huixiang Luo

h-index3
2papers
17citations

2 Papers

21.2CVSep 30, 2020Code
Pruning Filter in Filter

Fanxu Meng, Hao Cheng, Ke Li et al.

Pruning has become a very powerful and effective technique to compress and accelerate modern neural networks. Existing pruning methods can be grouped into two categories: filter pruning (FP) and weight pruning (WP). FP wins at hardware compatibility but loses at the compression ratio compared with WP. To converge the strength of both methods, we propose to prune the filter in the filter. Specifically, we treat a filter $F \in \mathbb{R}^{C\times K\times K}$ as $K \times K$ stripes, i.e., $1\times 1$ filters $\in \mathbb{R}^{C}$, then by pruning the stripes instead of the whole filter, we can achieve finer granularity than traditional FP while being hardware friendly. We term our method as SWP (\emph{Stripe-Wise Pruning}). SWP is implemented by introducing a novel learnable matrix called Filter Skeleton, whose values reflect the shape of each filter. As some recent work has shown that the pruned architecture is more crucial than the inherited important weights, we argue that the architecture of a single filter, i.e., the shape, also matters. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that SWP is more effective compared to the previous FP-based methods and achieves the state-of-art pruning ratio on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets without obvious accuracy drop. Code is available at https://github.com/fxmeng/Pruning-Filter-in-Filter

10.6CVJan 19, 2021
An Empirical Study and Analysis on Open-Set Semi-Supervised Learning

Huixiang Luo, Hao Cheng, Fanxu Meng et al.

Pseudo-labeling (PL) and Data Augmentation-based Consistency Training (DACT) are two approaches widely used in Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) methods. These methods exhibit great power in many machine learning tasks by utilizing unlabeled data for efficient training. But in a more realistic setting (termed as open-set SSL), where unlabeled dataset contains out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, the traditional SSL methods suffer severe performance degradation. Recent approaches mitigate the negative influence of OOD samples by filtering them out from the unlabeled data. However, it is not clear whether directly removing the OOD samples is the best choice. Furthermore, why PL and DACT could perform differently in open-set SSL remains a mystery. In this paper, we thoroughly analyze various SSL methods (PL and DACT) on open-set SSL and discuss pros and cons of these two approaches separately. Based on our analysis, we propose Style Disturbance to improve traditional SSL methods on open-set SSL and experimentally show our approach can achieve state-of-the-art results on various datasets by utilizing OOD samples properly. We believe our study can bring new insights for SSL research.