Xinyu Zhou

Yang Li, Xinyu Zhou, Yitong Wang et al.

Transformer models have revolutionized AI, enabling applications like content generation and sentiment analysis. However, their use in Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) raises significant privacy concerns, as centralized servers process sensitive user data. Private Transformer Inference (PTI) addresses these issues using cryptographic techniques such as Secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) and Homomorphic Encryption (HE), enabling secure model inference without exposing inputs or models. This paper reviews recent advancements in PTI, analyzing state-of-the-art solutions, their challenges, and potential improvements. We also propose evaluation guidelines to assess resource efficiency and privacy guarantees, aiming to bridge the gap between high-performance inference and data privacy.

Yang Li, Xinyu Zhou, Yitong Wang et al.

Transformer models have revolutionized AI, powering applications like content generation and sentiment analysis. However, their deployment in Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) raises significant privacy concerns, primarily due to the centralized processing of sensitive user data. Private Transformer Inference (PTI) offers a solution by utilizing cryptographic techniques such as secure multi-party computation and homomorphic encryption, enabling inference while preserving both user data and model privacy. This paper reviews recent PTI advancements, highlighting state-of-the-art solutions and challenges. We also introduce a structured taxonomy and evaluation framework for PTI, focusing on balancing resource efficiency with privacy and bridging the gap between high-performance inference and data privacy.

Philip Lazos, Francisco J. Marmolejo-Cossío, Xinyu Zhou et al.

"Pay-per-last-$N$-shares" (PPLNS) is one of the most common payout strategies used by mining pools in Proof-of-Work (PoW) cryptocurrencies. As with any payment scheme, it is imperative to study issues of incentive compatibility of miners within the pool. For PPLNS this question has only been partially answered; we know that reasonably-sized miners within a PPLNS pool prefer following the pool protocol over employing specific deviations. In this paper, we present a novel modification to PPLNS where we randomise the protocol in a natural way. We call our protocol "Randomised pay-per-last-$N$-shares" (RPPLNS), and note that the randomised structure of the protocol greatly simplifies the study of its incentive compatibility. We show that RPPLNS maintains the strengths of PPLNS (i.e., fairness, variance reduction, and resistance to pool hopping), while also being robust against a richer class of strategic mining than what has been shown for PPLNS.