Yuhao Tian

Quanxing Xu, Yuhao Tian, Ling Zhou et al.

Visual Question Answering (VQA), as the representative multimodal task, serves as a key benchmark for evaluating the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, existing evaluations largely rely on static datasets and accuracy-based metrics, which fail to capture robustness, consistency, and generalization. Inspired by Metamorphic Testing (MT), we propose Metamorphic Robustness Assessment (MetaRA), a testing framework that employs Metamorphic Relations (MRs) to systematically probe vulnerabilities in MLLM-based VQA systems. MetaRA generates controlled variations of image-question inputs based on specific MRs and evaluates models across diverse conditions. Applying MetaRA to multiple MLLM-based VQA models across different tasks reveals nuanced failure patterns, including sensitivity to linguistic perturbations, over-reliance on superficial visual cues, and deeper weaknesses in multimodal reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that MetaRA provides richer diagnostic insights than conventional accuracy metrics, exposing failure modes that remain hidden under standard benchmarks. Overall, this work highlights the need for systematic robustness evaluation in VQA and positions metamorphic assessment as a scalable, model-agnostic approach toward trustworthy multimodal AI.

Yuhao Tian, Zheming Yang

Industrial vision inspection requires high accuracy under stringent resource constraints, yet existing approaches face a fundamental trade-off. Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) deliver strong reasoning capabilities but incur prohibitive computational costs, while lightweight edge models often fail on complex cases. In this paper, we present SAEC, a scene-aware enhanced edge-cloud collaborative industrial vision inspection framework with MLLM. The framework is composed of three synergistic components: (1) Efficient MLLM Fine-Tuning for Complex Defect Inspection, (2) Lightweight Multiscale Scene-Complexity Estimation, and (3) Adaptive Edge-Cloud Scheduler. Together, these modules enable robust defect detection by tailoring multimodal reasoning to scene complexity and dynamically balancing computation between edge and cloud resources. Experimental results on MVTec AD and KSDD2 datasets demonstrate that SAEC attains 85.11% and 82.72% accuracy, surpassing Qwen by 22.1% and 20.8%, and LLaVA by 33.3% and 31.6%. It also reduces runtime by up to 22.4% and cuts energy per correct decision by 40%-74%. The code is available at https://github.com/YuHao-Tian/SAEC.