1.2DCJul 23, 2024Code
Reinforcement Learning-based Adaptive Mitigation of Uncorrected DRAM Errors in the FieldIsaac Boixaderas, Sergi Moré, Javier Bartolome et al.
Scaling to larger systems, with current levels of reliability, requires cost-effective methods to mitigate hardware failures. One of the main causes of hardware failure is an uncorrected error in memory, which terminates the current job and wastes all computation since the last checkpoint. This paper presents the first adaptive method for triggering uncorrected error mitigation. It uses a prediction approach that considers the likelihood of an uncorrected error and its current potential cost. The method is based on reinforcement learning, and the only user-defined parameters are the mitigation cost and whether the job can be restarted from a mitigation point. We evaluate our method using classical machine learning metrics together with a cost-benefit analysis, which compares the cost of mitigation actions with the benefits from mitigating some of the errors. On two years of production logs from the MareNostrum supercomputer, our method reduces lost compute time by 54% compared with no mitigation and is just 6% below the optimal Oracle method. All source code is open source.
6.6ARApr 18
Different Perspectives of Memory System SimulationPouya Esmaili-Dokht, Arash Yadegari, Victor Xirau et al.
Memory simulators are used to estimate application performance on advanced memory systems, yet they may exhibit significant discrepancies compared to real hardware. This paper investigates two key questions: (1) what causes these inaccuracies, and (2) how can simulators be properly validated to ensure reliable performance predictions. We propose a methodology that evaluates memory performance from three complementary perspectives: the memory simulator, the CPU-memory interface, and the application. Our analysis reveals that these perspectives can diverge substantially, with application-level performance often decoupled from internal simulator statistics. We identify the CPU-memory interface as the primary source of these inaccuracies. To address these problems, we implement a set of corrections and enhancements that improve the fidelity of integrated simulators. We evaluate these changes across multiple widely used simulators, including Ramulator, Ramulator 2, and DRAMsim3 integrated with ZSim. The results show that correcting interface-related issues is essential to achieve simulation outcomes that closely resemble actual system performance.
6.0ARMay 4
Performance and Energy Benefits of MRDIMMsPau Díaz, Mariana Carmin, Pouya Esmaili-Dokht et al.
Multiplexed Rank DIMMs (MRDIMMs) have recently emerged as memory devices that enable higher bandwidth without increasing DRAM chip frequencies. This paper presents a detailed performance, power and energy evaluation of a production server with high-end MRDIMM main memory. The memory system upgrade from conventional registered DIMMs (RDIMMs) to MRDIMMs extends the bandwidth by 41% yielding 27-41% higher performance for bandwidth-bound workloads. Additionally, the latency improvement reaches hundreds of nanoseconds, benefiting a broad class of workloads sensitive to memory latency. At the same bandwidth utilization levels, RDIMMs and MRDIMMs exhibit similar power consumption. In the MRDIMM-extended bandwidth region, the performance improvements largely exceed the power increase, delivering up to 30% server energy savings for memory-bound workloads.