Giulio Sandini

Lorenzo Natale, Chiara Bartolozzi, Francesco Nori et al.

In this chapter we describe the history and evolution of the iCub humanoid platform. We start by describing the first version as it was designed during the RobotCub EU project and illustrate how it evolved to become the platform that is adopted by more than 30 laboratories world wide. We complete the chapter by illustrating some of the research activities that are currently carried out on the iCub robot, i.e. visual perception, event driven sensing and dynamic control. We conclude the Chapter with a discussion of the lessons we learned and a preview of the upcoming next release of the robot, iCub 3.0.

Jonas Gonzalez-Billandon, Giulia Belgiovine, Alessandra Sciutti et al.

The ability to recognize human partners is an important social skill to build personalized and long-term human-robot interactions, especially in scenarios like education, care-giving, and rehabilitation. Faces and voices constitute two important sources of information to enable artificial systems to reliably recognize individuals. Deep learning networks have achieved state-of-the-art results and demonstrated to be suitable tools to address such a task. However, when those networks are applied to different and unprecedented scenarios not included in the training set, they can suffer a drop in performance. For example, with robotic platforms in ever-changing and realistic environments, where always new sensory evidence is acquired, the performance of those models degrades. One solution is to make robots learn from their first-hand sensory data with self-supervision. This allows coping with the inherent variability of the data gathered in realistic and interactive contexts. To this aim, we propose a cognitive architecture integrating low-level perceptual processes with a spatial working memory mechanism. The architecture autonomously organizes the robot's sensory experience into a structured dataset suitable for human recognition. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of our architecture and show that it is a promising solution in the quest of making robots more autonomous in their learning process.

Vipul Nair, Paul Hemeren, Alessia Vignolo et al.

Understanding which features humans rely on -- in visually recognizing action similarity is a crucial step towards a clearer picture of human action perception from a learning and developmental perspective. In the present work, we investigate to which extent a computational model based on kinematics can determine action similarity and how its performance relates to human similarity judgments of the same actions. To this aim, twelve participants perform an action similarity task, and their performances are compared to that of a computational model solving the same task. The chosen model has its roots in developmental robotics and performs action classification based on learned kinematic primitives. The comparative experiment results show that both the model and human participants can reliably identify whether two actions are the same or not. However, the model produces more false hits and has a greater selection bias than human participants. A possible reason for this is the particular sensitivity of the model towards kinematic primitives of the presented actions. In a second experiment, human participants' performance on an action identification task indicated that they relied solely on kinematic information rather than on action semantics. The results show that both the model and human performance are highly accurate in an action similarity task based on kinematic-level features, which can provide an essential basis for classifying human actions.

Andrea Del Prete, Francesco Romano, Lorenzo Natale et al.

This paper presents a new technique to control highly redundant mechanical systems, such as humanoid robots. We take inspiration from two approaches. Prioritized control is a widespread multi-task technique in robotics and animation: tasks have strict priorities and they are satisfied only as long as they do not conflict with any higher-priority task. Optimal control instead formulates an optimization problem whose solution is either a feedback control policy or a feedforward trajectory of control inputs. We introduce strict priorities in multi-task optimal control problems, as an alternative to weighting task errors proportionally to their importance. This ensures the respect of the specified priorities, while avoiding numerical conditioning issues. We compared our approach with both prioritized control and optimal control with tests on a simulated robot with 11 degrees of freedom.