Samuel Rudy

Samuel H. Rudy, J. Nathan Kutz, Steven L. Brunton

A critical challenge in the data-driven modeling of dynamical systems is producing methods robust to measurement error, particularly when data is limited. Many leading methods either rely on denoising prior to learning or on access to large volumes of data to average over the effect of noise. We propose a novel paradigm for data-driven modeling that simultaneously learns the dynamics and estimates the measurement noise at each observation. By constraining our learning algorithm, our method explicitly accounts for measurement error in the map between observations, treating both the measurement error and the dynamics as unknowns to be identified, rather than assuming idealized noiseless trajectories. We model the unknown vector field using a deep neural network, imposing a Runge-Kutta integrator structure to isolate this vector field, even when the data has a non-uniform timestep, thus constraining and focusing the modeling effort. We demonstrate the ability of this framework to form predictive models on a variety of canonical test problems of increasing complexity and show that it is robust to substantial amounts of measurement error. We also discuss issues with the generalizability of neural network models for dynamical systems and provide open-source code for all examples.

Samuel Rudy, Alessandro Alla, Steven L. Brunton et al.

In this work we present a data-driven method for the discovery of parametric partial differential equations (PDEs), thus allowing one to disambiguate between the underlying evolution equations and their parametric dependencies. Group sparsity is used to ensure parsimonious representations of observed dynamics in the form of a parametric PDE, while also allowing the coefficients to have arbitrary time series, or spatial dependence. This work builds on previous methods for the identification of constant coefficient PDEs, expanding the field to include a new class of equations which until now have eluded machine learning based identification methods. We show that group sequentially thresholded ridge regression outperforms group LASSO in identifying the fewest terms in the PDE along with their parametric dependency. The method is demonstrated on four canonical models with and without the introduction of noise.

Samuel Rudy, Themistoklis Sapsis

Many scientific and engineering problems require accurate models of dynamical systems with rare and extreme events. Such problems present a challenging task for data-driven modelling, with many naive machine learning methods failing to predict or accurately quantify such events. One cause for this difficulty is that systems with extreme events, by definition, yield imbalanced datasets and that standard loss functions easily ignore rare events. That is, metrics for goodness of fit used to train models are not designed to ensure accuracy on rare events. This work seeks to improve the performance of regression models for extreme events by considering loss functions designed to highlight outliers. We propose a novel loss function, the adjusted output weighted loss, and extend the applicability of relative entropy based loss functions to systems with low dimensional output. The proposed functions are tested using several cases of dynamical systems exhibiting extreme events and shown to significantly improve accuracy in predictions of extreme events.

Samuel H. Rudy, Themistoklis P. Sapsis

This work considers methods for imposing sparsity in Bayesian regression with applications in nonlinear system identification. We first review automatic relevance determination (ARD) and analytically demonstrate the need to additional regularization or thresholding to achieve sparse models. We then discuss two classes of methods, regularization based and thresholding based, which build on ARD to learn parsimonious solutions to linear problems. In the case of orthogonal covariates, we analytically demonstrate favorable performance with regards to learning a small set of active terms in a linear system with a sparse solution. Several example problems are presented to compare the set of proposed methods in terms of advantages and limitations to ARD in bases with hundreds of elements. The aim of this paper is to analyze and understand the assumptions that lead to several algorithms and to provide theoretical and empirical results so that the reader may gain insight and make more informed choices regarding sparse Bayesian regression.