Luxi Zhao

CV
h-index2
4papers
1citation
Novelty49%
AI Score47

4 Papers

7.7CVApr 23
Addressing Image Authenticity When Cameras Use Generative AI

Umar Masud, Abhijith Punnappurath, Luxi Zhao et al.

The ability of generative AI (GenAI) methods to photorealistically alter camera images has raised awareness about the authenticity of images shared online. Interestingly, images captured directly by our cameras are considered authentic and faithful. However, with the increasing integration of deep-learning modules into cameras' capture-time hardware -- namely, the image signal processor (ISP) -- there is now a potential for hallucinated content in images directly output by our cameras. Hallucinated capture-time image content is typically benign, such as enhanced edges or texture, but in certain operations, such as AI-based digital zoom or low-light image enhancement, hallucinations can potentially alter the semantics and interpretation of the image content. As a result, users may not realize that the content in their camera images is not authentic. This paper addresses this issue by enabling users to recover the 'unhallucinated' version of the camera image to avoid misinterpretation of the image content. Our approach works by optimizing an image-specific multi-layer perceptron (MLP) decoder together with a modality-specific encoder so that, given the camera image, we can recover the image before hallucinated content was added. The encoder and MLP are self-contained and can be applied post-capture to the image without requiring access to the camera ISP. Moreover, the encoder and MLP decoder require only 180 KB of storage and can be readily saved as metadata within standard image formats such as JPEG and HEIC.

6.2CVAug 20, 2025Code
Improved Mapping Between Illuminations and Sensors for RAW Images

Abhijith Punnappurath, Luxi Zhao, Hoang Le et al.

RAW images are unprocessed camera sensor output with sensor-specific RGB values based on the sensor's color filter spectral sensitivities. RAW images also incur strong color casts due to the sensor's response to the spectral properties of scene illumination. The sensor- and illumination-specific nature of RAW images makes it challenging to capture RAW datasets for deep learning methods, as scenes need to be captured for each sensor and under a wide range of illumination. Methods for illumination augmentation for a given sensor and the ability to map RAW images between sensors are important for reducing the burden of data capture. To explore this problem, we introduce the first-of-its-kind dataset comprising carefully captured scenes under a wide range of illumination. Specifically, we use a customized lightbox with tunable illumination spectra to capture several scenes with different cameras. Our illumination and sensor mapping dataset has 390 illuminations, four cameras, and 18 scenes. Using this dataset, we introduce a lightweight neural network approach for illumination and sensor mapping that outperforms competing methods. We demonstrate the utility of our approach on the downstream task of training a neural ISP. Link to project page: https://github.com/SamsungLabs/illum-sensor-mapping.

7.4CVMay 28
Mitigating Content Shift and Hallucination in GenAI Image Editing via Structural Refinement

Luxi Zhao, Michael S. Brown

Generative AI (GenAI) image editors, such as Nano Banana, produce visually compelling results for retouching tasks, enabling non-experts to edit images through text prompts alone. However, the generative nature of these models often introduces spatial misalignment, texture distortion, and content hallucination, all of which are detrimental to downstream workflows that require pixel-level fidelity. We identify a problem setting we call "structure-preserving GenAI fusion" for black-box GenAI image retouching: retain the perceptual enhancements of a GenAI output while enforcing structural faithfulness to the original input image. To address this problem, we propose a post-processing framework that fuses an input image with its GenAI-enhanced counterpart by first establishing coarse spatial and photometric correspondences, then performing a fusion stage that transfers desired enhancements while suppressing hallucinated content. In the absence of direct prior work in this setting, we evaluate our framework against representative methods from photorealistic style transfer and image fusion. Our experiments demonstrate that our method better preserves aesthetic quality while maintaining pixel-level structural consistency and the input resolution.

3.6CVDec 5, 2025
Edit-aware RAW Reconstruction

Abhijith Punnappurath, Luxi Zhao, Ke Zhao et al.

Users frequently edit camera images post-capture to achieve their preferred photofinishing style. While editing in the RAW domain provides greater accuracy and flexibility, most edits are performed on the camera's display-referred output (e.g., 8-bit sRGB JPEG) since RAW images are rarely stored. Existing RAW reconstruction methods can recover RAW data from sRGB images, but these approaches are typically optimized for pixel-wise RAW reconstruction fidelity and tend to degrade under diverse rendering styles and editing operations. We introduce a plug-and-play, edit-aware loss function that can be integrated into any existing RAW reconstruction framework to make the recovered RAWs more robust to different rendering styles and edits. Our loss formulation incorporates a modular, differentiable image signal processor (ISP) that simulates realistic photofinishing pipelines with tunable parameters. During training, parameters for each ISP module are randomly sampled from carefully designed distributions that model practical variations in real camera processing. The loss is then computed in sRGB space between ground-truth and reconstructed RAWs rendered through this differentiable ISP. Incorporating our loss improves sRGB reconstruction quality by up to 1.5-2 dB PSNR across various editing conditions. Moreover, when applied to metadata-assisted RAW reconstruction methods, our approach enables fine-tuning for target edits, yielding further gains. Since photographic editing is the primary motivation for RAW reconstruction in consumer imaging, our simple yet effective loss function provides a general mechanism for enhancing edit fidelity and rendering flexibility across existing methods.