Alexander Apartsin

Alexander Apartsin, Yehudit Aperstein

Choosing or ranking language models for a specific application is hardest when no task-specific labeled data exists, and standard public benchmarks cannot be trusted, their items having likely leaked into pretraining, so scores reflect memorization rather than fitness. We present CoEval, an open-source, reusable framework that closes this gap end to end: from only a description of a task or domain, teacher models synthesize a fresh, attribute-controlled benchmark with no human labels, contamination-free because items are generated anew on each run, and a cross-family judge ensemble ranks candidate models with no human raters. Validated where ground truth exists, CoEval recovers the true model ranking and tracks ground-truth correctness at ho=0.86. The label-free judging needs no human calibration because judge-panel composition (vendor diversity), not size, drives reliability: a small, well-chosen cross-family panel is most reliable, while a single judge can be anti-correlated with ground truth (judge-choice regret 0.35) and the ensemble never is. Generated items show zero verbatim 13-gram overlap with five major public benchmarks; the panel cancels verbosity bias and precludes same-family self-preference. A four-task study produced 7,978 evaluations for USD 5.89. The same declarative pipeline applies to any domain and is cheap enough to re-run on every model release: a label-free, contamination-free leaderboard any team can regenerate for its own application.

Alexander Apartsin, Yehudit Aperstein

Generative AI makes answers easy and understanding hard, and uncritical use invites cognitive offloading. Schools still measure unaided performance, yet the real task is to produce good work with AI: framing an ill-defined task, judging the output, and steering the model toward a better result. This ability is rarely assessed in its own right; where measured, it collapses into one "prompting" score that cannot diagnose why AI use succeeds or fails. We propose CoRe-3 (Co-Reasoning), a competency model factoring productive AI use into three assessable skills we abbreviate FJS: Framing (specifying an ill-defined task before invoking AI), Judging (evaluating output for errors and unstated assumptions), and Steering (iteratively redirecting the model). Its distinguishing claim is the separation of pre-generation Framing from post-generation Steering, with Judging as the gate between. We ground the skills in theory, state five testable propositions, and instantiate them in CoReasoningLab, an open platform that presents flawed AI output and scores them independently. Over simulated learners (generated and graded by different models), the skills dissociate: each tracks its own manipulated competence while staying flat in the others, and grades become correlated when one competence is shared across all three (convergent and discriminant validity), across grader backends from two providers. Human-rater agreement and outcomes are next; we release the instrument, data, and protocol.

Yehudit Aperstein, Alexander Apartsin

Energetic-materials performance gains translate directly into reduced propellant mass, smaller warheads, and more efficient civilian gas-generators, yet no new HMX-class compound has been disclosed in fifteen years. Designing one is a sparse-label problem: of ~66 k labelled CHNO molecules only ~3 k carry experimental or DFT-quality measurements, and naive generative models trained on the full mixture either memorise the high-performance tail or extrapolate without calibration. We introduce Domain-Gated Latent Diffusion (DGLD): a label-quality gate at training time, multi-task score-model guidance at sample time, and a four-stage chemistry-validation funnel ending in first-principles DFT audit. The result is 12 DFT-confirmed novel leads. The headline compound, 3,4,5-trinitro-1,2-isoxazole (L1), reaches \r{ho}_"cal" =2.09 g/cm3 and D_"K-J,cal" =8.25 km/s and is structurally dissimilar from all 65 980 training molecules (nearest-neighbour Tanimoto 0.27). A co-headline lead, E1 (4-nitro-1,2,3,5-oxatriazole), exceeds L1 on calibrated detonation velocity (D_"K-J,cal" =9.00 km/s) from a chemotype family disjoint from L1's. DGLD is the only method to land in the productive quadrant (simultaneously novel and on-target) at DFT level. SMILES-LSTM memorises 18.3% of its outputs exactly; SELFIES-GA's best novel candidate loses 3.5 km/s under DFT audit; REINVENT 4 generates novel high-N heterocycles but peaks at D=9.02 km/s. Code, checkpoints, and 918 mined hard negatives are released on Zenodo (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19821953); the next compound to enter the HMX-class band can be discovered, validated, and recommended for synthesis at the cost of a few GPU-days.

Michal Laufer, Yehudit Aperstein, Alexander Apartsin

Objective. Outpatient notes carry follow-up instructions pairing actions with future times ("MRI brain in two weeks"). Extracting (action, date) pairs supports scheduling and audit, but generative extractors miss the date because linking and arithmetic are implicit in decoding. We test a hybrid neural-symbolic pipeline against direct generation. Methods. We define TestSpecification and TimeSpecification entities and a ScheduledFor relation. BioBERT feeds BIO tagging and a biaffine linker; entities are canonicalized via a 28-action ontology and times normalized to day offsets deterministically. We evaluate on a 2,000-note synthetic outpatient corpus with action-disjoint splits (18 train, 6 OOV-test) against zero-shot GPT-4o-mini and LoRA-fine-tuned LLaMA-3 8B with note-level bootstrap 95% CIs. Results. On 259-note seen and OOV splits the hybrid pipeline achieves Test-Time Pair F1 of 0.997 and 0.986 with 0.00-day MAE. Baselines reach high action F1 (LLaMA-3 0.992; GPT-4o-mini 0.963 seen) but Pair F1 stays at 0.51-0.57 (LLaMA-3) and 0.53 (GPT-4o-mini), CIs non-overlapping with the hybrid. Conclusion. Separating learned entity extraction from deterministic date arithmetic outperforms generation on this benchmark, generalizes to held-out actions, and exposes failure modes. Transfer to real EHR notes is the next validation; a first-pass realism check is in Limitations.

Alexander Apartsin, Omri Sason, Yehudit Aperstein

Teacher education requires deliberate practice with learners who exhibit identifiable strengths, weaknesses, and partial mastery. Large language models could support such practice by simulating students with known skill components, enabling teachers to rehearse explanations, diagnoses, and instructional responses. For this purpose, however, the central requirement is neither to maximize benchmark accuracy nor to suppress isolated facts, but to control model behavior so that it reflects a specified skill profile. This paper investigates whether prompted language models can be steered to retain some skills while suppressing others. We introduce a benchmark-oriented framework in which an explicit skill vector represents a simulated student, prompt-based control specifies retained and missing competencies, and behavior is evaluated using profile-alignment metrics, retained-versus-forgotten comparisons, and cross-skill calibration analyses. The results show that selective partial mastery can be induced and measured in a structured mathematics setting, although the degree of controllability remains model-dependent. These findings position controllable learner simulation as a distinct research problem at the intersection of teacher education, educational simulation, and language-model control.

Yehudit Aperstein, Alexander Apartsin

Educational aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) can support course improvement, but public aspect-labeled student feedback remains scarce because educational reviews are private, institution-specific, and expensive to annotate. This study introduces a controlled synthetic benchmark for educational ABSA built from 10,000 synthetic course reviews with explicit train-validation-test splits and a 20-aspect pedagogical schema spanning instructional quality, assessment and course management, learning demand, learning environment, and engagement. The corpus is generated with sampled target labels, sampled nuance attributes, and a realism-tuned prompt refined through a three-cycle judge-editor procedure. On the resulting benchmark, local baselines with TF-IDF, two-step transformers, and joint encoders show that the task is nontrivial; the strongest untuned model, BERT, reaches a held-out detection micro-F1 of 0.2760, while a modest lower-rate BERT schedule improves this to 0.2930. Full-test GPT-based inference with gpt-5.2 reaches 0.2519 micro-F1 in zero-shot mode and 0.2501 with retrieval-based few-shot prompting, placing batch inference above the classical baseline and close to the compact joint encoders. A conservative external evaluation on 2,829 mapped student-feedback reviews from Herath et al. yields a micro-F1 of 0.4593 for BERT on a 9-aspect overlap, indicating partial synthetic-to-real transfer. Realism and faithfulness analyses are reported as generator diagnostics that clarify how the benchmark was stabilized and where label noise remains. The study therefore contributes a synthetic educational ABSA corpus, a documented generation procedure, and a reproducible benchmark setting for a domain in which public labeled data remain difficult to obtain.

Alexander Apartsin, Yigal Meshulam, Yehudit Aperstein

Multi-robot task allocation usually assumes some combination of communication, known task models, or a coordinator. We study the opposite extreme, a regime common in practice but overlooked in theory, which we name Zero-Knowledge MRTA (ZK-MRTA): a robot team with no prior knowledge (no task models, not even the latent rank), no communication (no messages, no parameter sharing, no coordinator), and only a partial and privately-noisy view of a public stream of teammates' outcomes. A hidden low-rank structure governs which robot suits which task, and there are far more tasks than rounds, so most (robot, task) pairs are never attempted. Yet each robot can act well on tasks it never attempted, and onboard new tasks, by running online low-rank collaborative filtering over the broadcast (SwarmCF). The advantage over any structure-free learner is categorical, not a constant factor: a structure-free learner is provably at the prior-mean error floor on unseen pairs. We prove a matching per-robot sample complexity (Θ(d) versus Θ(n), in the rank d and the task count n), an anytime (cumulative-reward) separation under task scarcity, and a deterministic condition under which decentralized recovery from the masked broadcast is exact (validated empirically). Experiments quantify the value of the broadcast, a positive scaling law (per-robot unseen-pair skill rises with team size), and the strongest masking-robustness and anytime profile among low-rank methods, recovering most (about 80% on earned skill) of a centralized full-communication ceiling, and holding under capacity-1 contention and in a robotics-grounded sensing instance.

Yehudit Aperstein, Linoy Halifa, Sagiv Bar et al.

Enhancing reader engagement while preserving informational fidelity is a central challenge in controllable text generation for news media. Optimizing news headlines for reader engagement is often conflated with clickbait, resulting in exaggerated or misleading phrasing that undermines editorial trust. We frame clickbait not as a separate stylistic category, but as an extreme outcome of disproportionate amplification of otherwise legitimate engagement cues. Based on this view, we formulate headline rewriting as a controllable generation problem, where specific engagement-oriented linguistic attributes are selectively strengthened under explicit constraints on semantic faithfulness and proportional emphasis. We present a guided headline rewriting framework built on a large language model (LLM) that uses the Future Discriminators for Generation (FUDGE) paradigm for inference-time control. The LLM is steered by two auxiliary guide models: (1) a clickbait scoring model that provides negative guidance to suppress excessive stylistic amplification, and (2) an engagement-attribute model that provides positive guidance aligned with target clickability objectives. Both guides are trained on neutral headlines drawn from a curated real-world news corpus. At the same time, clickbait variants are generated synthetically by rewriting these original headlines using an LLM under controlled activation of predefined engagement tactics. By adjusting guidance weights at inference time, the system generates headlines along a continuum from neutral paraphrases to more engaging yet editorially acceptable formulations. The proposed framework provides a principled approach for studying the trade-off between attractiveness, semantic preservation, and clickbait avoidance, and supports responsible LLM-based headline optimization in journalistic settings.

Tomer Atia, Yehudit Aperstein, Alexander Apartsin

Maritime distress communications transmitted over very high frequency (VHF) radio are safety-critical voice messages used to report emergencies at sea. Under the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS), such messages follow standardized procedures and are expected to convey essential details, including vessel identity, position, nature of the distress, and required assistance. In practice, however, automatic analysis remains difficult because distress messages are often brief, noisy, and produced under stress, may deviate from the prescribed format, and are further degraded by automatic speech recognition (ASR) errors caused by channel noise and speaker stress. This paper presents SeaAlert, an LLM-based framework for robust analysis of maritime distress communications. To address the scarcity of labeled real-world data, we develop a synthetic data generation pipeline in which an LLM produces realistic and diverse maritime messages, including challenging variants in which standard distress codewords are omitted or replaced with less explicit expressions. The generated utterances are synthesized into speech, degraded with simulated VHF noise, and transcribed by an ASR system to obtain realistic noisy transcripts.

Eden Mama, Liel Sheri, Yehudit Aperstein et al.

The widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare raises critical questions about their ability to interpret patient-generated narratives, which are often informal, ambiguous, and noisy. Existing benchmarks typically rely on clean, structured clinical text, offering limited insight into model performance under realistic conditions. In this work, we present a novel synthetic dataset designed to simulate patient self-descriptions characterized by varying levels of linguistic noise, fuzzy language, and layperson terminology. Our dataset comprises clinically consistent scenarios annotated with ground-truth diagnoses, spanning a spectrum of communication clarity to reflect diverse real-world reporting styles. Using this benchmark, we fine-tune and evaluate several state-of-the-art models (LLMs), including BERT-based and encoder-decoder T5 models. To support reproducibility and future research, we release the Noisy Diagnostic Benchmark (NDB), a structured dataset of noisy, synthetic patient descriptions designed to stress-test and compare the diagnostic capabilities of large language models (LLMs) under realistic linguistic conditions. We made the benchmark available for the community: https://github.com/lielsheri/PatientSignal

Dvora Goncharok, Arbel Shifman, Alexander Apartsin et al.

Online medical forums are a rich and underutilized source of insight into patient concerns, especially regarding medication use. Some of the many questions users pose may signal confusion, misuse, or even the early warning signs of a developing health crisis. Detecting these critical questions that may precede severe adverse events or life-threatening complications is vital for timely intervention and improving patient safety. This study introduces a novel annotated dataset of medication-related questions extracted from online forums. Each entry is manually labelled for criticality based on clinical risk factors. We benchmark the performance of six traditional machine learning classifiers using TF-IDF textual representations, alongside three state-of-the-art large language model (LLM)-based classification approaches that leverage deep contextual understanding. Our results highlight the potential of classical and modern methods to support real-time triage and alert systems in digital health spaces. The curated dataset is made publicly available to encourage further research at the intersection of patient-generated data, natural language processing, and early warning systems for critical health events. The dataset and benchmark are available at: https://github.com/Dvora-coder/LLM-Medication-QA-Risk-Classifier-MediGuard.

Lihi Nofar, Tomer Portal, Aviv Elbaz et al.

The proliferation of clickbait headlines poses significant challenges to the credibility of information and user trust in digital media. While recent advances in machine learning have improved the detection of manipulative content, the lack of explainability limits their practical adoption. This paper presents a model for explainable clickbait detection that not only identifies clickbait titles but also attributes them to specific linguistic manipulation strategies. We introduce a synthetic dataset generated by systematically augmenting real news headlines using a predefined catalogue of clickbait strategies. This dataset enables controlled experimentation and detailed analysis of model behaviour. We present a two-stage framework for automatic clickbait analysis comprising detection and tactic attribution. In the first stage, we compare a fine-tuned BERT classifier with large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4.0 and Gemini 2.4 Flash, under both zero-shot prompting and few-shot prompting enriched with illustrative clickbait headlines and their associated persuasive tactics. In the second stage, a dedicated BERT-based classifier predicts the specific clickbait strategies present in each headline. This work advances the development of transparent and trustworthy AI systems for combating manipulative media content. We share the dataset with the research community at https://github.com/LLM-HITCS25S/ClickbaitTacticsDetection

Shay Dahary, Avi Edana, Alexander Apartsin et al.

The emotional content of song lyrics plays a pivotal role in shaping listener experiences and influencing musical preferences. This paper investigates the task of multi-label emotional attribution of song lyrics by predicting six emotional intensity scores corresponding to six fundamental emotions. A manually labeled dataset is constructed using a mean opinion score (MOS) approach, which aggregates annotations from multiple human raters to ensure reliable ground-truth labels. Leveraging this dataset, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of several publicly available large language models (LLMs) under zero-shot scenarios. Additionally, we fine-tune a BERT-based model specifically for predicting multi-label emotion scores. Experimental results reveal the relative strengths and limitations of zero-shot and fine-tuned models in capturing the nuanced emotional content of lyrics. Our findings highlight the potential of LLMs for emotion recognition in creative texts, providing insights into model selection strategies for emotion-based music information retrieval applications. The labeled dataset is available at https://github.com/LLM-HITCS25S/LyricsEmotionAttribution.

Yehudit Aperstein, Eden Moran, Alexander Apartsin

When people recount personal memories, they often refer to people, places, and events indirectly, relying on contextual cues rather than explicit names. Such implicit references are central to reminiscence narratives: first-person accounts of lived experience used in therapeutic, archival, and social settings. They pose a difficult computational problem because the intended entity must be inferred from dispersed narrative evidence rather than from a local mention. We introduce IRC-Bench, the Implicit Reminiscence Context Benchmark, for evaluating implicit entity recognition in reminiscence transcripts. The benchmark targets non-locality: entity-identifying cues are distributed across multiple, non-contiguous clauses, unlike named entity recognition, entity linking, or coreference resolution. IRC-Bench comprises 25,136 samples constructed from 12,337 Wiki-data-linked entities across 1,994 transcripts spanning 11 thematic domains. Each sample pairs an Entity-Grounded Narrative, in which the target entity is explicitly mentioned, with an Entity-Elided Narrative, in which direct mentions are removed. We evaluate 19 configurations across LLM generation, dense retrieval, RAG, and fine-tuning. QLoRA-adapted Llama 3.1 8B performs best in the open-world setting (38.94% exact match; 51.59% Jaccard), while fine-tuned DPR leads closed-world retrieval (35.38% Hit@1; 71.49% Hit@10). We release IRC-Bench with data, code, and evaluation tools.

Igor Adamenko, Orpaz Ben Aharon, Yehudit Aperstein et al.

Urban environments contain many imaging sensors built for specific purposes, including ATM, body-worn, CCTV, and dashboard cameras. Under the opportunistic sensing paradigm, these sensors can be repurposed for secondary inference tasks such as license plate recognition. Yet objects of interest in such imagery are often noisy, low-resolution, and captured from extreme viewpoints. Recent advances in AI-based restoration can recover use-ful information even from severely degraded images. A central challenge is determining which distortion parame-ters allow reliable recovery and which lead to inference failure. This paper introduces recoverability maps, a task-agnostic method for quantifying this boundary. The method combines a dense synthetic sweep of degrada-tion parameters with two summary measures: boundary area-under-curve, which estimates the recoverable frac-tion of the parameter space, and a reliability score, which captures the frequency and severity of failures within that region. We demonstrate the method on license plate recognition from highly angled views under realistic camera artifacts. Several restoration architectures are trained and evaluated, including U-Net, Restormer, Pix2Pix, and SR3 diffusion. The best model recovers about 93% of the parameter space. Similar results across models sug-gest that sensing geometry, rather than architecture, sets the limit of recovery.

Yehudit Aperstein, Amit Tzahar, Alon Gottlib et al.

Overconfidence in deep learning models poses a significant risk in high-stakes medical imaging tasks, particularly in multi-label classification of chest X-rays, where multiple co-occurring pathologies must be detected simultaneously. This study introduces an uncertainty-aware framework for chest X-ray diagnosis based on a DenseNet-121 backbone, enhanced with two selective prediction mechanisms: entropy-based rejection and confidence interval-based rejection. Both methods enable the model to abstain from uncertain predictions, improving reliability by deferring ambiguous cases to clinical experts. A quantile-based calibration procedure is employed to tune rejection thresholds using either global or class-specific strategies. Experiments conducted on three large public datasets (PadChest, NIH ChestX-ray14, and MIMIC-CXR) demonstrate that selective rejection improves the trade-off between diagnostic accuracy and coverage, with entropy-based rejection yielding the highest average AUC across all pathologies. These results support the integration of selective prediction into AI-assisted diagnostic workflows, providing a practical step toward safer, uncertainty-aware deployment of deep learning in clinical settings.

Matan Cohen, Shira Shani, Eden Menahem et al.

Accurately assessing candidate seniority from resumes is a critical yet challenging task, complicated by the prevalence of overstated experience and ambiguous self-presentation. In this study, we investigate the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs), including fine-tuned BERT architectures, for automating seniority classification in resumes. To rigorously evaluate model performance, we introduce a hybrid dataset comprising both real-world resumes and synthetically generated hard examples designed to simulate exaggerated qualifications and understated seniority. Using the dataset, we evaluate the performance of Large Language Models in detecting subtle linguistic cues associated with seniority inflation and implicit expertise. Our findings highlight promising directions for enhancing AI-driven candidate evaluation systems and mitigating bias introduced by self-promotional language. The dataset is available for the research community at https://bit.ly/4mcTovt

Yehudit Aperstein, Alexander Apartsin

Real-time image classification on resource-constrained platforms demands inference methods that balance accuracy with strict latency and power budgets. Early-exit strategies address this need by attaching auxiliary classifiers to intermediate layers of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), allowing "easy" samples to terminate inference early. However, conventional training of early exits introduces a covariance shift: downstream branches are trained on full datasets, while at inference they process only the harder, non-exited samples. This mismatch limits efficiency--accuracy trade-offs in practice. We introduce the Boosted Training Scheme for Early Exits (BTS-EE), a sequential training approach that aligns branch training with inference-time data distributions. Each branch is trained and calibrated before the next, ensuring robustness under selective inference conditions. To further support embedded deployment, we propose a lightweight branch architecture based on 1D convolutions and a Class Precision Margin (CPM) calibration method that enables per-class threshold tuning for reliable exit decisions. Experiments on the CINIC-10 dataset with a ResNet18 backbone demonstrate that BTS-EE consistently outperforms non-boosted training across 64 configurations, achieving up to 45 percent reduction in computation with only 2 percent accuracy degradation. These results expand the design space for deploying CNNs in real-time image processing systems, offering practical efficiency gains for applications such as industrial inspection, embedded vision, and UAV-based monitoring.

Yehudit Aperstein, Alon Gottlib, Gal Benita et al.

Understanding how information is shared across documents, regardless of the format in which it is expressed, is critical for tasks such as information retrieval, summarization, and content alignment. In this work, we introduce a novel framework for modelling Semantic Coverage Relations (SCR), which classifies document pairs based on how their informational content aligns. We define three core relation types: equivalence, where both texts convey the same information using different textual forms or styles; inclusion, where one document fully contains the information of another and adds more; and semantic overlap, where each document presents partially overlapping content. To capture these relations, we adopt a question answering (QA)-based approach, using the answerability of shared questions across documents as an indicator of semantic coverage. We construct a synthetic dataset derived from the SQuAD corpus by paraphrasing source passages and selectively omitting information, enabling precise control over content overlap. This dataset allows us to benchmark generative language models and train transformer-based classifiers for SCR prediction. Our findings demonstrate that discriminative models significantly outperform generative approaches, with the RoBERTa-base model achieving the highest accuracy of 61.4% and the Random Forest-based model showing the best balance with a macro-F1 score of 52.9%. The results show that QA provides an effective lens for assessing semantic relations across stylistically diverse texts, offering insights into the capacity of current models to reason about information beyond surface similarity. The dataset and code developed in this study are publicly available to support reproducibility.

Inbal Bolshinsky, Shani Kupiec, Almog Sasson et al.

In the era of conversational AI, generating accurate and contextually appropriate service responses remains a critical challenge. A central question remains: Is explicit intent recognition a prerequisite for generating high-quality service responses, or can models bypass this step and produce effective replies directly? This paper conducts a rigorous comparative study to address this fundamental design dilemma. Leveraging two publicly available service interaction datasets, we benchmark several state-of-the-art language models, including a fine-tuned T5 variant, across both paradigms: Intent-First Response Generation and Direct Response Generation. Evaluation metrics encompass both linguistic quality and task success rates, revealing surprising insights into the necessity or redundancy of explicit intent modelling. Our findings challenge conventional assumptions in conversational AI pipelines, offering actionable guidelines for designing more efficient and effective response generation systems.

Yogev Cohen, Dudi Ohayon, Romy Somkin et al.

Automating the decision of whether a code change requires manual review is vital for maintaining software quality in modern development workflows. However, the emergence of new programming languages and frameworks creates a critical bottleneck: while large volumes of unlabelled code are readily available, there is an insufficient amount of labelled data to train supervised models for review classification. We address this challenge by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to translate code changes from well-resourced languages into equivalent changes in underrepresented or emerging languages, generating synthetic training data where labelled examples are scarce. We assume that although LLMs have learned the syntax and semantics of new languages from available unlabelled code, they have yet to fully grasp which code changes are considered significant or review-worthy within these emerging ecosystems. To overcome this, we use LLMs to generate synthetic change examples and train supervised classifiers on them. We systematically compare the performance of these classifiers against models trained on real labelled data. Our experiments across multiple GitHub repositories and language pairs demonstrate that LLM-generated synthetic data can effectively bootstrap review recommendation systems, narrowing the performance gap even in low-resource settings. This approach provides a scalable pathway to extend automated code review capabilities to rapidly evolving technology stacks, even in the absence of annotated data.

Dor Cohen, Inga Efrosman, Yehudit Aperstein et al.

First responders widely adopt body-worn cameras to document incident scenes and support post-event analysis. However, reviewing lengthy video footage is impractical in time-critical situations. Effective situational awareness demands a concise visual summary that can be quickly interpreted. This work presents a computer vision pipeline that transforms body-camera footage into informative panoramic images summarizing the incident scene. Our method leverages monocular Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) to estimate camera trajectories and reconstruct the spatial layout of the environment. Key viewpoints are identified by clustering camera poses along the trajectory, and representative frames from each cluster are selected. These frames are fused into spatially coherent panoramic images using multi-frame stitching techniques. The resulting summaries enable rapid understanding of complex environments and facilitate efficient decision-making and incident review.

Yaniv Goren, Yuval Cohen, Alexander Apartsin et al.

In the realm of human-computer interaction, fostering a natural dialogue between humans and machines is paramount. A key, often overlooked, component of this dialogue is the use of interjections such as "mmm" and "hmm". Despite their frequent use to express agreement, hesitation, or requests for information, these interjections are typically dismissed as "non-words" by Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) engines. Addressing this gap, we introduce a novel task dedicated to interjection classification, a pioneer in the field to our knowledge. This task is challenging due to the short duration of interjection signals and significant inter- and intra-speaker variability. In this work, we present and publish a dataset of interjection signals collected specifically for interjection classification. We employ this dataset to train and evaluate a baseline deep learning model. To enhance performance, we augment the training dataset using techniques such as tempo and pitch transformation, which significantly improve classification accuracy, making models more robust. The interjection dataset, a Python library for the augmentation pipeline, baseline model, and evaluation scripts, are available to the research community.