Sukriti Manna

Sukriti Manna, Henry Chan, Subramanian K. R. S. Sankaranarayanan

Multiphysics simulation frameworks such as MOOSE provide rigorous engines for phase-field materials modeling, yet adoption is constrained by the expertise required to construct valid input files, coordinate parameter sweeps, diagnose failures, and extract quantitative results. We introduce AutoMOOSE, an open-source agentic framework that orchestrates the full simulation lifecycle from a single natural-language prompt. AutoMOOSE deploys a five-agent pipeline in which the Input Writer coordinates six sub-agents and the Reviewer autonomously corrects runtime failures without user intervention. A modular plugin architecture enables new phase-field formulations without modifying the core framework, and a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server exposes the workflow as ten structured tools for interoperability with any MCP-compatible client. Validated on a four-temperature copper grain growth benchmark, AutoMOOSE generates MOOSE input files with 6 of 12 structural blocks matching a human expert reference exactly and 4 functionally equivalent, executes all runs in parallel with a 1.8x speedup, and performs an end-to-end physical consistency check spanning intent, finite-element execution, and Arrhenius kinetics with no human verification. Grain coarsening kinetics are recovered with R^2 = 0.90-0.95 at T >= 600 K; the recovered activation energy Q_fit = 0.296 eV is consistent with a human-written reference (Q_fit = 0.267 eV) under identical parameters. Three runtime failure classes were diagnosed and resolved autonomously within a single correction cycle, and every run produces a provenance record satisfying FAIR data principles. These results show that the gap between knowing the physics and executing a validated simulation campaign can be bridged by a lightweight multi-agent orchestration layer, providing a pathway toward AI-driven materials discovery and self-driving laboratories.

Dipayan Sanpui, Anirban Chandra, Henry Chan et al.

We present a probabilistic framework to accurately estimate dimensions of additively manufactured components. Using a dataset of 405 parts from nine production runs involving two machines, three polymer materials, and two-part configurations, we examine five key design features. To capture both design information and manufacturing variability, we employ models integrating continuous and categorical factors. For predicting Difference from Target (DFT) values, we test deterministic and probabilistic machine learning methods. Deterministic models, trained on 80% of the dataset, provide precise point estimates, with Support Vector Regression (SVR) achieving accuracy close to process repeatability. To address systematic deviations, we adopt Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). GPR delivers strong predictive performance and interpretability, while BNNs capture both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. We investigate two BNN approaches: one balancing accuracy and uncertainty capture, and another offering richer uncertainty decomposition but with lower dimensional accuracy. Our results underscore the importance of quantifying epistemic uncertainty for robust decision-making, risk assessment, and model improvement. We discuss trade-offs between GPR and BNNs in terms of predictive power, interpretability, and computational efficiency, noting that model choice depends on analytical needs. By combining deterministic precision with probabilistic uncertainty quantification, our study provides a rigorous foundation for uncertainty-aware predictive modeling in AM. This approach not only enhances dimensional accuracy but also supports reliable, risk-informed design strategies, thereby advancing data-driven manufacturing methodologies.