Carl Bettosi

Carl Bettosi, Kefan Chen, Ryan Shah et al.

Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) have shown promising potential in therapeutic scenarios as decision-making instructors or motivational companions. In human-human therapy, experts often communicate the thought process behind the decisions they make to promote transparency and build trust. As research aims to incorporate more complex decision-making models into these robots to drive better interaction, the ability for the SAR to explain its decisions becomes an increasing challenge. We present the latest examples of complex SAR decision-makers. We argue that, based on the importance of transparent communication in human-human therapy, SARs should incorporate such components into their design. To stimulate discussion around this topic, we present a set of design considerations for researchers.

Carl Bettosi, Lynne Ballie, Susan Shenkin et al.

Social robots offer a promising solution for autonomously guiding patients through physiotherapy exercise sessions, but effective deployment requires advanced decision-making to adapt to patient needs. A key challenge is the scarcity of patient behavior data for developing robust policies. To address this, we engaged 33 expert healthcare practitioners as patient proxies, using their interactions with our robot to inform a patient behavior model capable of generating exercise performance metrics and subjective scores on perceived exertion. We trained a reinforcement learning-based policy in simulation, demonstrating that it can adapt exercise instructions to individual exertion tolerances and fluctuating performance, while also being applicable to patients at different recovery stages with varying exercise plans.