Alexander V. Panfilov

Arip Asadulaev, Vitaly Shutov, Alexander Korotin et al.

We present a novel algorithm for domain adaptation using optimal transport. In domain adaptation, the goal is to adapt a classifier trained on the source domain samples to the target domain. In our method, we use optimal transport to map target samples to the domain named source fiction. This domain differs from the source but is accurately classified by the source domain classifier. Our main idea is to generate a source fiction by c-cyclically monotone transformation over the target domain. If samples with the same labels in two domains are c-cyclically monotone, the optimal transport map between these domains preserves the class-wise structure, which is the main goal of domain adaptation. To generate a source fiction domain, we propose an algorithm that is based on our finding that adversarial attacks are a c-cyclically monotone transformation of the dataset. We conduct experiments on Digits and Modern Office-31 datasets and achieve improvement in performance for simple discrete optimal transport solvers for all adaptation tasks.

Arip Asadulaev, Alexander Panfilov, Andrey Filchenkov

Adversarial examples are transferable between different models. In our paper, we propose to use this property for multi-step domain adaptation. In unsupervised domain adaptation settings, we demonstrate that replacing the source domain with adversarial examples to $\mathcal{H} Δ\mathcal{H}$-divergence can improve source classifier accuracy on the target domain. Our method can be connected to most domain adaptation techniques. We conducted a range of experiments and achieved improvement in accuracy on Digits and Office-Home datasets.

Arip Asadulaev, Alexander Panfilov, Andrey Filchenkov

It was shown that adversarial examples improve object recognition. But what about their opposite side, easy examples? Easy examples are samples that the machine learning model classifies correctly with high confidence. In our paper, we are making the first step toward exploring the potential benefits of using easy examples in the training procedure of neural networks. We propose to use an auxiliary batch normalization for easy examples for the standard and robust accuracy improvement.

Chon Lok Lei, Sanmitra Ghosh, Dominic G. Whittaker et al.

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a vital step in using mathematical models and simulations to take decisions. The field of cardiac simulation has begun to explore and adopt UQ methods to characterise uncertainty in model inputs and how that propagates through to outputs or predictions. In this perspective piece we draw attention to an important and under-addressed source of uncertainty in our predictions -- that of uncertainty in the model structure or the equations themselves. The difference between imperfect models and reality is termed model discrepancy, and we are often uncertain as to the size and consequences of this discrepancy. Here we provide two examples of the consequences of discrepancy when calibrating models at the ion channel and action potential scales. Furthermore, we attempt to account for this discrepancy when calibrating and validating an ion channel model using different methods, based on modelling the discrepancy using Gaussian processes (GPs) and autoregressive-moving-average (ARMA) models, then highlight the advantages and shortcomings of each approach. Finally, suggestions and lines of enquiry for future work are provided.