3.7CVOct 14, 2022
InFIP: An Explainable DNN Intellectual Property Protection Method based on Intrinsic FeaturesMingfu Xue, Xin Wang, Yinghao Wu et al.
Intellectual property (IP) protection for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has raised serious concerns in recent years. Most existing works embed watermarks in the DNN model for IP protection, which need to modify the model and lack of interpretability. In this paper, for the first time, we propose an interpretable intellectual property protection method for DNN based on explainable artificial intelligence. Compared with existing works, the proposed method does not modify the DNN model, and the decision of the ownership verification is interpretable. We extract the intrinsic features of the DNN model by using Deep Taylor Decomposition. Since the intrinsic feature is composed of unique interpretation of the model's decision, the intrinsic feature can be regarded as fingerprint of the model. If the fingerprint of a suspected model is the same as the original model, the suspected model is considered as a pirated model. Experimental results demonstrate that the fingerprints can be successfully used to verify the ownership of the model and the test accuracy of the model is not affected. Furthermore, the proposed method is robust to fine-tuning attack, pruning attack, watermark overwriting attack, and adaptive attack.
8.4CROct 15, 2023
Turn Passive to Active: A Survey on Active Intellectual Property Protection of Deep Learning ModelsMingfu Xue, Leo Yu Zhang, Yushu Zhang et al.
The intellectual property protection of deep learning (DL) models has attracted increasing serious concerns. Many works on intellectual property protection for Deep Neural Networks (DNN) models have been proposed. The vast majority of existing work uses DNN watermarking to verify the ownership of the model after piracy occurs, which is referred to as passive verification. On the contrary, we focus on a new type of intellectual property protection method named active copyright protection, which refers to active authorization control and user identity management of the DNN model. As of now, there is relatively limited research in the field of active DNN copyright protection. In this review, we attempt to clearly elaborate on the connotation, attributes, and requirements of active DNN copyright protection, provide evaluation methods and metrics for active copyright protection, review and analyze existing work on active DL model intellectual property protection, discuss potential attacks that active DL model copyright protection techniques may face, and provide challenges and future directions for active DL model intellectual property protection. This review is helpful to systematically introduce the new field of active DNN copyright protection and provide reference and foundation for subsequent work.
8.8CVJan 31, 2022
Imperceptible and Multi-channel Backdoor Attack against Deep Neural NetworksMingfu Xue, Shifeng Ni, Yinghao Wu et al.
Recent researches demonstrate that Deep Neural Networks (DNN) models are vulnerable to backdoor attacks. The backdoored DNN model will behave maliciously when images containing backdoor triggers arrive. To date, existing backdoor attacks are single-trigger and single-target attacks, and the triggers of most existing backdoor attacks are obvious thus are easy to be detected or noticed. In this paper, we propose a novel imperceptible and multi-channel backdoor attack against Deep Neural Networks by exploiting Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) steganography. Based on the proposed backdoor attack method, we implement two variants of backdoor attacks, i.e., N-to-N backdoor attack and N-to-One backdoor attack. Specifically, for a colored image, we utilize DCT steganography to construct the trigger on different channels of the image. As a result, the trigger is stealthy and natural. Based on the proposed method, we implement multi-target and multi-trigger backdoor attacks. Experimental results demonstrate that the average attack success rate of the N-to-N backdoor attack is 93.95% on CIFAR-10 dataset and 91.55% on TinyImageNet dataset, respectively. The average attack success rate of N-to-One attack is 90.22% and 89.53% on CIFAR-10 and TinyImageNet datasets, respectively. Meanwhile, the proposed backdoor attack does not affect the classification accuracy of the DNN model. Moreover, the proposed attack is demonstrated to be robust to the state-of-the-art backdoor defense (Neural Cleanse).
9.4CVJan 3, 2022
Compression-Resistant Backdoor Attack against Deep Neural NetworksMingfu Xue, Xin Wang, Shichang Sun et al.
In recent years, many backdoor attacks based on training data poisoning have been proposed. However, in practice, those backdoor attacks are vulnerable to image compressions. When backdoor instances are compressed, the feature of specific backdoor trigger will be destroyed, which could result in the backdoor attack performance deteriorating. In this paper, we propose a compression-resistant backdoor attack based on feature consistency training. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first backdoor attack that is robust to image compressions. First, both backdoor images and their compressed versions are input into the deep neural network (DNN) for training. Then, the feature of each image is extracted by internal layers of the DNN. Next, the feature difference between backdoor images and their compressed versions are minimized. As a result, the DNN treats the feature of compressed images as the feature of backdoor images in feature space. After training, the backdoor attack against DNN is robust to image compression. Furthermore, we consider three different image compressions (i.e., JPEG, JPEG2000, WEBP) in feature consistency training, so that the backdoor attack is robust to multiple image compression algorithms. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed backdoor attack. When the backdoor instances are compressed, the attack success rate of common backdoor attack is lower than 10%, while the attack success rate of our compression-resistant backdoor is greater than 97%. The compression-resistant attack is still robust even when the backdoor images are compressed with low compression quality. In addition, extensive experiments have demonstrated that, our compression-resistant backdoor attack has the generalization ability to resist image compression which is not used in the training process.
10.7CRSep 16, 2021
Protect the Intellectual Property of Dataset against Unauthorized UseMingfu Xue, Yinghao Wu, Yushu Zhang et al.
Training high performance Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) models require large-scale and high-quality datasets. The expensive cost of collecting and annotating large-scale datasets make the valuable datasets can be considered as the Intellectual Property (IP) of the dataset owner. To date, almost all the copyright protection schemes for deep learning focus on the copyright protection of models, while the copyright protection of the dataset is rarely studied. In this paper, we propose a novel method to actively protect the dataset from being used to train DNN models without authorization. Experimental results on on CIFAR-10 and TinyImageNet datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Compared with the model trained on clean dataset, the proposed method can effectively make the test accuracy of the unauthorized model trained on protected dataset drop from 86.21% to 38.23% and from 74.00% to 16.20% on CIFAR-10 and TinyImageNet datasets, respectively.
19.6CRMay 28, 2021
AdvParams: An Active DNN Intellectual Property Protection Technique via Adversarial Perturbation Based Parameter EncryptionMingfu Xue, Zhiyu Wu, Jian Wang et al.
A well-trained DNN model can be regarded as an intellectual property (IP) of the model owner. To date, many DNN IP protection methods have been proposed, but most of them are watermarking based verification methods where model owners can only verify their ownership passively after the copyright of DNN models has been infringed. In this paper, we propose an effective framework to actively protect the DNN IP from infringement. Specifically, we encrypt the DNN model's parameters by perturbing them with well-crafted adversarial perturbations. With the encrypted parameters, the accuracy of the DNN model drops significantly, which can prevent malicious infringers from using the model. After the encryption, the positions of encrypted parameters and the values of the added adversarial perturbations form a secret key. Authorized user can use the secret key to decrypt the model. Compared with the watermarking methods which only passively verify the ownership after the infringement occurs, the proposed method can prevent infringement in advance. Moreover, compared with most of the existing active DNN IP protection methods, the proposed method does not require additional training process of the model, which introduces low computational overhead. Experimental results show that, after the encryption, the test accuracy of the model drops by 80.65%, 81.16%, and 87.91% on Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and GTSRB, respectively. Moreover, the proposed method only needs to encrypt an extremely low number of parameters, and the proportion of the encrypted parameters of all the model's parameters is as low as 0.000205%. The experimental results also indicate that, the proposed method is robust against model fine-tuning attack and model pruning attack. Moreover, for the adaptive attack where attackers know the detailed steps of the proposed method, the proposed method is also demonstrated to be robust.
21.0CRApr 15, 2021
Robust Backdoor Attacks against Deep Neural Networks in Real Physical WorldMingfu Xue, Can He, Shichang Sun et al.
Deep neural networks (DNN) have been widely deployed in various applications. However, many researches indicated that DNN is vulnerable to backdoor attacks. The attacker can create a hidden backdoor in target DNN model, and trigger the malicious behaviors by submitting specific backdoor instance. However, almost all the existing backdoor works focused on the digital domain, while few studies investigate the backdoor attacks in real physical world. Restricted to a variety of physical constraints, the performance of backdoor attacks in the real physical world will be severely degraded. In this paper, we propose a robust physical backdoor attack method, PTB (physical transformations for backdoors), to implement the backdoor attacks against deep learning models in the real physical world. Specifically, in the training phase, we perform a series of physical transformations on these injected backdoor instances at each round of model training, so as to simulate various transformations that a backdoor may experience in real world, thus improves its physical robustness. Experimental results on the state-of-the-art face recognition model show that, compared with the backdoor methods that without PTB, the proposed attack method can significantly improve the performance of backdoor attacks in real physical world. Under various complex physical conditions, by injecting only a very small ratio (0.5%) of backdoor instances, the attack success rate of physical backdoor attacks with the PTB method on VGGFace is 82%, while the attack success rate of backdoor attacks without the proposed PTB method is lower than 11%. Meanwhile, the normal performance of the target DNN model has not been affected.
8.8CRMar 2, 2021
ActiveGuard: An Active DNN IP Protection Technique via Adversarial ExamplesMingfu Xue, Shichang Sun, Can He et al.
The training of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) is costly, thus DNN can be considered as the intellectual properties (IP) of model owners. To date, most of the existing protection works focus on verifying the ownership after the DNN model is stolen, which cannot resist piracy in advance. To this end, we propose an active DNN IP protection method based on adversarial examples against DNN piracy, named ActiveGuard. ActiveGuard aims to achieve authorization control and users' fingerprints management through adversarial examples, and can provide ownership verification. Specifically, ActiveGuard exploits the elaborate adversarial examples as users' fingerprints to distinguish authorized users from unauthorized users. Legitimate users can enter fingerprints into DNN for identity authentication and authorized usage, while unauthorized users will obtain poor model performance due to an additional control layer. In addition, ActiveGuard enables the model owner to embed a watermark into the weights of DNN. When the DNN is illegally pirated, the model owner can extract the embedded watermark and perform ownership verification. Experimental results show that, for authorized users, the test accuracy of LeNet-5 and Wide Residual Network (WRN) models are 99.15% and 91.46%, respectively, while for unauthorized users, the test accuracy of the two DNNs are only 8.92% (LeNet-5) and 10% (WRN), respectively. Besides, each authorized user can pass the fingerprint authentication with a high success rate (up to 100%). For ownership verification, the embedded watermark can be successfully extracted, while the normal performance of the DNN model will not be affected. Further, ActiveGuard is demonstrated to be robust against fingerprint forgery attack, model fine-tuning attack and pruning attack.
23.4CRNov 27, 2020
Intellectual Property Protection for Deep Learning Models: Taxonomy, Methods, Attacks, and EvaluationsMingfu Xue, Yushu Zhang, Jian Wang et al.
The training and creation of deep learning model is usually costly, thus it can be regarded as an intellectual property (IP) of the model creator. However, malicious users who obtain high-performance models may illegally copy, redistribute, or abuse the models without permission. To deal with such security threats, a few deep neural networks (DNN) IP protection methods have been proposed in recent years. This paper attempts to provide a review of the existing DNN IP protection works and also an outlook. First, we propose the first taxonomy for DNN IP protection methods in terms of six attributes: scenario, mechanism, capacity, type, function, and target models. Then, we present a survey on existing DNN IP protection works in terms of the above six attributes, especially focusing on the challenges these methods face, whether these methods can provide proactive protection, and their resistances to different levels of attacks. After that, we analyze the potential attacks on DNN IP protection methods from the aspects of model modifications, evasion attacks, and active attacks. Besides, a systematic evaluation method for DNN IP protection methods with respect to basic functional metrics, attack-resistance metrics, and customized metrics for different application scenarios is given. Lastly, future research opportunities and challenges on DNN IP protection are presented.