Seokjin Go

Seokjin Go, Marko Scrbak, Ephrem Wu et al.

In distributed Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) inference, input-dependent token routing interacts with GPU performance variability to create persistent stragglers under synchronized execution, where the slowest GPU determines layer latency. This performance variability is inherent to modern accelerators: manufacturing variation, power limits, and thermal conditions introduce measurable execution-time differences across nominally identical GPUs. The core challenge is that MoE execution-time imbalance arises from the interaction of workload skew and hardware asymmetry. Token routing produces uneven and layer-varying expert loads, while GPU throughput depends on device-specific operating characteristics and workload intensity. Prior work mitigates routing skew but assumes homogeneous hardware, optimizing token balance rather than execution latency. As a result, even balanced token assignments can leave hardware-induced stragglers unaddressed. Thus, we propose Variability-Informed Binning of Experts (ViBE), a hardware-aware expert placement framework that minimizes execution-time imbalance across GPUs. ViBE combines per-GPU performance modeling with expert activation profiling to assign high-load experts to faster devices and low-load experts to slower ones, reducing layer-level stragglers without modifying model semantics or hardware. Because both workload characteristics and effective GPU throughput can shift across serving conditions, ViBE supports lightweight recalibration under workload/performance drift to refresh its routing and performance estimates when needed. Results show that ViBE consistently reduces execution-time imbalance and improves SLO attainment by 14%, while lowering P90 TTFT by up to 45%. We further show that the impact of hardware variability increases at scale, making variability-aware placement important for efficient, high-utilization LLM serving.

Seokjin Go, Joongun Park, Spandan More et al.

The rapid scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) has pushed training workloads far beyond the limits of single-node analysis, demanding a deeper understanding of how these models behave across large-scale, multi-GPU systems. In this paper, we present a comprehensive characterization of LLM training across diverse real-world workloads and hardware platforms, including NVIDIA H100/H200 and AMD MI250 GPUs. We analyze dense and sparse models under various parallelism strategies -- tensor, pipeline, data, and expert -- and evaluate their effects on hardware utilization, power consumption, and thermal behavior. We further evaluate the effectiveness of optimizations such as activation recomputation and compute-communication overlap. Our findings show that performance is not determined solely by scaling hardware capacity. Scale-up systems with fewer, higher-memory GPUs can outperform scale-out systems in communication-bound regimes, but only under carefully tuned configurations; in other cases, scale-out deployments achieve superior throughput. We also show that certain parallelism combinations, such as tensor with pipeline, lead to bandwidth underutilization due to inefficient data chunking, while increasing microbatch sizes beyond a certain point induces bursty execution and peak power excursions that worsen thermal throttling. These insights reveal how training performance is shaped by complex interactions between hardware, system topology, and model execution. We conclude by offering recommendations for system and hardware design to improve the scalability and reliability of future LLM systems and workloads. The source code of this project is available at https://github.com/sitar-lab/CharLLM-PPT.

Seokjin Go, Divya Mahajan

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model architecture has emerged as a promising solution for scaling transformer models efficiently, offering sparse activation that reduces computational costs while increasing model capacity. However, as MoE models scale, they need to be distributed across GPU devices, thus face critical performance bottlenecks due to their large memory footprint. Expert parallelism distributes experts across GPUs, however, faces key challenges including an unbalanced token routing and expert activation, resulting in communication tail latency and processing inefficiencies. While existing solutions address some of these issues, they fail to resolve the dual challenges of load imbalance and communication skew. The imbalance in token processing load across experts causes uneven processing times on different GPUs, while communication skew between GPUs leads to unbalanced inter-GPU data transfers. These factors degrade the performance of MoE models by increasing tail latency and reducing overall throughput. To address these limitations, we propose an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation to optimize expert placement by jointly considering token load, communication, and computation costs. We exploit the property that there is a token routing dependency across layers, where tokens routed to a specific expert in one layer are likely to be routed to a limited set of experts in the subsequent layer. Our solution, MoETuner, offers an optimal expert-to-GPU assignment that minimizes inter-GPU token routing costs and balances token processing across devices, thereby reducing tail latency and end-to-end execution time. Experimental results demonstrate 9.3% and 17.5% of end-to-end speedups for single-node and multi-node inference respectively, showcasing the potential of our ILP-based optimization for offering expert parallel solutions for next-generation MoEs.