Aroosa Hameed

Hesham G. Moussa, Aroosa Hameed, Arashmid Akhavain

To cope with real-world dynamics, an intelligent system needs to incrementally acquire, update, and exploit knowledge throughout its lifetime. This ability, known as Continual learning, provides a foundation for AI systems to develop themselves adaptively. Catastrophic forgetting is a major challenge to the progress of Continual Learning approaches, where learning a new task usually results in a dramatic performance drop on previously learned ones. Many approaches have emerged to counteract the impact of CF. Most of the proposed approaches can be categorized into five classes: replay-based, regularization-based, optimization-based, representation-based, and architecture-based. In this work, we approach the problem from a different angle, specifically by considering the optimal sequencing of tasks as they are presented to the model. We investigate the role of task sequencing in mitigating CF and propose a method for determining the optimal task order. The proposed method leverages zero-shot scoring algorithms inspired by neural architecture search (NAS). Results demonstrate that intelligent task sequencing can substantially reduce CF. Moreover, when combined with traditional continual learning strategies, sequencing offers enhanced performance and robustness against forgetting. Additionally, the presented approaches can find applications in other fields, such as curriculum learning.

Shadikur Rahman, Aroosa Hameed, Gautam Srivastava et al.

To optimize the reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we propose a novel cloud-edge collaborative architecture that enables a structured, multi-agent prompting framework. This framework comprises three specialized components: GuideLLM, a lightweight model deployed at the edge to provide methodological guidance; SolverLLM, a more powerful model hosted in the cloud responsible for generating code solutions; and JudgeLLM, an automated evaluator for assessing solution correctness and quality. To evaluate and demonstrate the effectiveness of this architecture in realistic settings, we introduce RefactorCoderQA, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate and enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) across multi-domain coding tasks. Motivated by the limitations of existing benchmarks, RefactorCoderQA systematically covers various technical domains, including Software Engineering, Data Science, Machine Learning, and Natural Language Processing, using authentic coding challenges from Stack Overflow. Extensive experiments reveal that our fine-tuned model, RefactorCoder-MoE, achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly outperforming leading open-source and commercial baselines with an overall accuracy of 76.84%. Human evaluations further validate the interpretability, accuracy, and practical relevance of the generated solutions. In addition, we evaluate system-level metrics, such as throughput and latency, to gain deeper insights into the performance characteristics and trade-offs of the proposed architecture.

Sabiya Banu Masthan Ali, Oussema Kirmani, Aroosa Hameed et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used in software engineering to generate, complete, translate, and fix code, improving developer productivity. While most research focuses on the energy consumption and carbon emissions of model training and inference, far less attention has been given to the sustainability of the code these models produce. The efficiency of generated code affects the long-term environmental impact of software systems. Inefficient code can increase CPU usage, memory consumption, execution time, and overall energy use during deployment and operation. As LLM-generated code becomes more common in real-world projects, even small inefficiencies can lead to high environmental costs over time. This paper examines existing research on the sustainability of code generated by LLMs. We conduct a systematic literature review to analyze selected primary studies and investigate the extent to which LLMs are capable of producing sustainable code. In addition, we examine how sustainability is defined and measured in this context, including the metrics and evaluation strategies used to assess energy efficiency and resource usage. We also explore whether techniques such as fine-tuning and prompt engineering influence the sustainability of generated code. Through a structured analysis of the selected studies, we categorize research efforts based on their methodological approaches, evaluation practices, and experimental settings. The findings indicate that research in this area remains relatively limited and fragmented, with no widely accepted framework for measuring or benchmarking the sustainability of LLM-generated code. These observations highlight the need for clearer definitions, standardized evaluation methods, and systematic research to support environmentally friendly AI-assisted software engineering.