Gabriele Liga

SP
h-index19
3papers
43citations
Novelty53%
AI Score41

3 Papers

6.0ITMay 11
Syndrome Adaptive Gain Control for Min-Sum Decoding of Quantum LDPC Codes

Hernan Cordova, Alexios Balatsoukas-Stimming, Yunus Can Gültekin et al.

Min-Sum (MS) decoding is a popular low-complexity alternative to belief propagation (BP), retaining only the minimum incoming message magnitude during check-node (CN) processing, at the cost of systematic message magnitude overestimation. The scaled MS (SMS) decoder compensates for this effect using a fixed scaling factor. We propose the syndrome adaptive gain Min-Sum (SAGMS) decoder for quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) codes, which adapts the message gain online based on the fraction of unsatisfied stabilizers, requiring no per-code or per-noise level optimization. We show that the scaling factor required for SMS to match belief propagation decreases with the CN degree, so any fixed scaling optimized for one degree incurs into a growing penalty as the CN degree varies. SAGMS avoids this limitation by adapting the gain during decoding. Simulations on generalized bicycle QLDPC codes demonstrate that SAGMS matches or outperforms the frame error rate (FER) of an offline optimized SMS decoder. Moreover, SAGMS approaches BP performance and, under certain conditions outperforms it while retaining MS-level complexity.

6.6SPJan 25, 2020
Model-Based Machine Learning for Joint Digital Backpropagation and PMD Compensation

Christian Häger, Henry D. Pfister, Rick M. Bütler et al.

We propose a model-based machine-learning approach for polarization-multiplexed systems by parameterizing the split-step method for the Manakov-PMD equation. This approach performs hardware-friendly DBP and distributed PMD compensation with performance close to the PMD-free case.

5.1SPApr 22, 2019
Revisiting Multi-Step Nonlinearity Compensation with Machine Learning

Christian Häger, Henry D. Pfister, Rick M. Bütler et al.

For the efficient compensation of fiber nonlinearity, one of the guiding principles appears to be: fewer steps are better and more efficient. We challenge this assumption and show that carefully designed multi-step approaches can lead to better performance-complexity trade-offs than their few-step counterparts.