Yang Li

h-index7
2papers
218citations

2 Papers

8.8LGNov 13, 2023Code
Benchmarking PtO and PnO Methods in the Predictive Combinatorial Optimization Regime

Haoyu Geng, Hang Ruan, Runzhong Wang et al.

Predictive combinatorial optimization, where the parameters of combinatorial optimization (CO) are unknown at the decision-making time, is the precise modeling of many real-world applications, including energy cost-aware scheduling and budget allocation on advertising. Tackling such a problem usually involves a prediction model and a CO solver. These two modules are integrated into the predictive CO pipeline following two design principles: "Predict-then-Optimize (PtO)", which learns predictions by supervised training and subsequently solves CO using predicted coefficients, while the other, named "Predict-and-Optimize (PnO)", directly optimizes towards the ultimate decision quality and claims to yield better decisions than traditional PtO approaches. However, there lacks a systematic benchmark of both approaches, including the specific design choices at the module level, as well as an evaluation dataset that covers representative real-world scenarios. To this end, we develop a modular framework to benchmark 11 existing PtO/PnO methods on 8 problems, including a new industrial dataset for combinatorial advertising that will be released. Our study shows that PnO approaches are better than PtO on 7 out of 8 benchmarks, but there is no silver bullet found for the specific design choices of PnO. A comprehensive categorization of current approaches and integration of typical scenarios are provided under a unified benchmark. Therefore, this paper could serve as a comprehensive benchmark for future PnO approach development and also offer fast prototyping for application-focused development. The code is available at https://github.com/Thinklab-SJTU/PredictiveCO-Benchmark.

5.2CRFeb 7, 2022
Distributed Differentially Private Ranking Aggregation

Baobao Song, Qiujun Lan, Yang Li et al.

Ranking aggregation is commonly adopted in cooperative decision-making to assist in combining multiple rankings into a single representative. To protect the actual ranking of each individual, some privacy-preserving strategies, such as differential privacy, are often used. This, however, does not consider the scenario where the curator, who collects all rankings from individuals, is untrustworthy. This paper proposed a mechanism to solve the above situation using the distribute differential privacy framework. The proposed mechanism collects locally differential private rankings from individuals, then randomly permutes pairwise rankings using a shuffle model to further amplify the privacy protection. The final representative is produced by hierarchical rank aggregation. The mechanism was theoretically analysed and experimentally compared against existing methods, and demonstrated competitive results in both the output accuracy and privacy protection.