Patricia Hu

Patricia Hu, Silvan Peter, Gerhard Widmer

In recent years, thanks to advances in automatic music transcription (AMT), several large-scale datasets of automatically transcribed piano solo music have been released. While these datasets undoubtedly offer extensive material for performance studies, they vary substantially in quality. In the case of classical music, performances often differ not only in expressive aspects such as tempo, but also in their structural interpretation of the score (including repeat patterns and edition-specific variants). To meaningfully use large-scale transcribed datasets for performance research, transcriptions of the same piece must be grouped according to their underlying structural realisation to support valid comparison. We address this by applying sequence-to-sequence alignment followed by hierarchical clustering: we create pairwise alignments for all pairs of transcriptions of a given piece, and use the alignment cost and (dis)similarity of performed sequence lengths to resolve structural mismatches as features for grouping. We propose this approach as a first step towards automatically evaluating large-scale transcribed datasets that lack ground-truth score and/or audio, shifting the evaluation criterion from truth-based accuracy to musical coherence and plausibility. We demonstrate our score-agnostic approach on around 1,500 transcriptions of 88 compositions from a recently published large-scale transcribed piano performance dataset.

Silvan Peter, Patricia Hu, Gerhard Widmer

Audio-to-score alignment is a long-standing challenge in music information retrieval and arguably the most widely applicable alignment task for music research. Alignment algorithms match two versions of a piece of music, and for this to work these versions need to be in comparable formats. Audio-to-audio alignment matches audio features; when matching audio files to scores, they must either synthesize the score or derive audio-like features by means of piano rolls or similar feature sequences. Symbolic alignment, by contrast, matches symbolically encoded notes; in an audio-to-score scenario these would be obtained by a transcription of the audio file. In this article, we present an algorithm that bridges audio-like and symbol-level features directly. Sequential audio features encoding onset and spectral activation are matched to score positions by a bespoke dynamic programming-based matching algorithm derived from symbolic alignment methods. The resulting method is both precise - surpassing widely used audio-to-audio approaches based on synthesized scores -, and remains flexible in its digital signal processing components, i.e., the method is adaptable to diverse timbral characteristics without requiring a separate transcription model. Furthermore it inherits some of the symbolic alignment runtime advantages with an algorithmic complexity that is at worst linear in the length of the (typically short) symbolic score and (typically long) audio feature sequence. In the following sections, we provide a detailed algorithm description and evaluate its alignment quality on a large-scale dataset of solo piano recordings.

Lukáš Samuel Marták, Patricia Hu, Gerhard Widmer

Automatic Music Transcription (AMT) is the task of recognizing notes in audio recordings of music. The State-of-the-Art (SotA) benchmarks have been dominated by deep learning systems. Due to the scarcity of high quality data, they are usually trained and evaluated exclusively or predominantly on classical piano music. Unfortunately, that hinders our ability to understand how they generalize to other music. Previous works have revealed several aspects of memorization and overfitting in these systems. We identify two primary sources of distribution shift: the music, and the sound. Complementing recent results on the sound axis (i.e. acoustics, timbre), we investigate the musical one (i.e. note combinations, dynamics, genre). We evaluate the performance of several SotA AMT systems on two new experimental test sets which we carefully construct to emulate different levels of musical distribution shift. Our results reveal a stark performance gap, shedding further light on the Corpus Bias problem, and the extent to which it continues to trouble these systems.

Lukáš Samuel Marták, Patricia Hu, Gerhard Widmer

Automatic Music Transcription (AMT) -- the task of converting music audio into note representations -- has seen rapid progress, driven largely by deep learning systems. Due to the limited availability of richly annotated music datasets, much of the progress in AMT has been concentrated on classical piano music, and even a few very specific datasets. Whether these systems can generalize effectively to other musical contexts remains an open question. Complementing recent studies on distribution shifts in sound (e.g., recording conditions), in this work we investigate the musical dimension -- specifically, variations in genre, dynamics, and polyphony levels. To this end, we introduce the MDS corpus, comprising three distinct subsets -- (1) Genre, (2) Random, and (3) MAEtest -- to emulate different axes of distribution shift. We evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art AMT systems on the MDS corpus using both traditional information-retrieval and musically-informed performance metrics. Our extensive evaluation isolates and exposes varying degrees of performance degradation under specific distribution shifts. In particular, we measure a note-level F1 performance drop of 20 percentage points due to sound, and 14 due to genre. Generally, we find that dynamics estimation proves more vulnerable to musical variation than onset prediction. Musically informed evaluation metrics, particularly those capturing harmonic structure, help identify potential contributing factors. Furthermore, experiments with randomly generated, non-musical sequences reveal clear limitations in system performance under extreme musical distribution shifts. Altogether, these findings offer new evidence of the persistent impact of the Corpus Bias problem in deep AMT systems.

Patricia Hu, Silvan David Peter, Jan Schlüter et al.

Advances in neural network design and the availability of large-scale labeled datasets have driven major improvements in piano transcription. Existing approaches target either offline applications, with no restrictions on computational demands, or online transcription, with delays of 128-320 ms. However, most real-time musical applications require latencies below 30 ms. In this work, we investigate whether and how the current state-of-the-art online transcription model can be adapted for real-time piano transcription. Specifically, we eliminate all non-causal processing, and reduce computational load through shared computations across core model components and variations in model size. Additionally, we explore different pre- and postprocessing strategies, and related label encoding schemes, and discuss their suitability for real-time transcription. Evaluating the adaptions on the MAESTRO dataset, we find a drop in transcription accuracy due to strictly causal processing as well as a tradeoff between the preprocessing latency and prediction accuracy. We release our system as a baseline to support researchers in designing models towards minimum latency real-time transcription.