Qiaobo Hao

Jieting Xiao, Yun Lin, Huizhen Qiu et al.

While Large Language Models have achieved remarkable integration in various vertical scenarios, their deployment in the telecommunications domain remains exploratory due to the lack of a standardized evaluation framework. Current telecom benchmarks primarily focus on static, foundational knowledge and isolated atomic skills, neglecting the equipment-specific documentation and end-to-end industrial workflows essential for real-world production systems. To bridge this gap, we present TeleCom-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 12 evaluation sets with 22,678 curated samples, which evaluates LLMs across a synergistic hierarchy: (1) Multi-dimensional Knowledge Comprehension, which integrates telecommunication fundamentals, 3GPP protocols, and 5G network architecture with proprietary product knowledge across wired, core, and wireless networks via knowledge graph-driven synthesis; and (2)End-to-End Knowledge Application, which formalizes six core tasks on authentic trajectories from live network agent workflows, including intent recognition, entity extraction, event verification, tool invocation, root cause analysis, and solution generation-across network optimization and fault maintenance scenarios. Evaluations of eight state-of-the-art LLMs reveal a universal Execution Wall: while models achieve 90% accuracy in linguistic interface tasks such as intent recognition and entity extraction, performance collapses to approximately 30% in procedural execution tasks like solution generation. This capability gap demonstrates that current LLMs function competently as diagnosticians but fail as field engineers. TeleCom-Bench provides standardized diagnostics to precisely pinpoint this deficit, offering actionable guidance for domain-specific alignment toward production-ready telecom agents. The dataset and evaluation code have been released at https://github.com/ZTE-AICloud/TeleCom-Bench.

Taojie Zhu, Dongyang Xu, Ding Zou et al.

Post-training paradigms for Large Language Models (LLMs), primarily Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), face a fundamental dilemma: SFT provides stability (low variance) but suffers from high fitting bias, while RL enables exploration (low bias) but grapples with high gradient variance. Existing unified optimization strategies often employ naive loss weighting, overlooking the statistical conflict between these distinct gradient signals. In this paper, we provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of this bias-variance trade-off and propose \textbf{DYPO} (Dynamic Policy Optimization), a unified framework designed to structurally mitigate this conflict. DYPO integrates three core components: (1) a \textit{Group Alignment Loss (GAL)} that leverages intrinsic group dynamics to significantly reduce RL gradient variance; (2) a \textit{Multi-Teacher Distillation} mechanism that corrects SFT fitting bias via diverse reasoning paths; and (3) a \textit{Dynamic Exploitation-Exploration Gating} mechanism that adaptively arbitrates between stable SFT and exploratory RL based on reward feedback. Theoretical analysis confirms that DYPO linearly reduces fitting bias and minimizes overall variance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DYPO significantly outperforms traditional sequential pipelines, achieving an average improvement of 4.8\% on complex reasoning benchmarks and 13.3\% on out-of-distribution tasks. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Tocci-Zhu/DYPO.

Qiaobo Hao, Yangqian Wu, Shunyi Wang et al.

Post-training alignment determines the reasoning and human preference following capabilities of large language models, yet most existing works withhold detailed data construction, filtering rules and training recipes, which hinders community reproducibility and lightweight model optimization. This work presents NebulaExp, a fully transparent, ablation-driven post-training pipeline built on Qwen3-8B-base, covering two orthogonal model branches: general instruct model and complex reasoning-specialized model. We curate a raw corpus of 3.84M multi-source SFT samples and a 200K verifiable RL candidate pool, and design an end-to-end data processing stack including response distillation, multi-dimensional cross-verification filtering, fine-grained difficulty grading, task classification and diversity-aware sampling. For the Instruct branch, our three-stage optimized supervised fine-tuning approach NebulaExp-Ins-SFT improves the average benchmark score from the 55.01 baseline of Qwen3-8B-nothink to 60.99. GRPO reinforcement learning then further elevates the average score to 61.85. For the Reasoning branch, medium-difficulty GRPO RL improves average reasoning score from 73.88 to 75.17. To address RL's dependency on task verifiers, we systematically investigate single-teacher and multi-teacher OPD (MOPD): utilizing merely 4K instruction-following samples and outperforms RL baseline by 3.26 points on IFEval with +4.43 average overall gain; MOPD fuses four domain-specialist teachers with merely 10K samples, lifting average performance by 4.18 over the base model. This report provides a fully reproducible empirical post-training recipe for 8B-scale LLMs, and comprehensively dissects the capability trade-offs among instruction adherence, mathematical reasoning, code generation and general knowledge.

Weixuan Sun, Jucai Zhai, Dengfeng Liu et al.

The automated repair of C++ compilation errors presents a significant challenge, the resolution of which is critical for developer productivity. Progress in this domain is constrained by two primary factors: the scarcity of large-scale, high-fidelity datasets and the limitations of conventional supervised methods, which often fail to generate semantically correct patches.This paper addresses these gaps by introducing a comprehensive framework with three core contributions. First, we present CCrepair, a novel, large-scale C++ compilation error dataset constructed through a sophisticated generate-and-verify pipeline. Second, we propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL) paradigm guided by a hybrid reward signal, shifting the focus from mere compilability to the semantic quality of the fix. Finally, we establish the robust, two-stage evaluation system providing this signal, centered on an LLM-as-a-Judge whose reliability has been rigorously validated against the collective judgments of a panel of human experts. This integrated approach aligns the training objective with generating high-quality, non-trivial patches that are both syntactically and semantically correct. The effectiveness of our approach was demonstrated experimentally. Our RL-trained Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct model achieved performance comparable to a Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct model, validating the efficiency of our training paradigm. Our work provides the research community with a valuable new dataset and a more effective paradigm for training and evaluating robust compilation repair models, paving the way for more practical and reliable automated programming assistants.