Qinghua Zhou

LG
h-index21
6papers
43citations
Novelty57%
AI Score29

6 Papers

9.8LGSep 7, 2023
How adversarial attacks can disrupt seemingly stable accurate classifiers

Oliver J. Sutton, Qinghua Zhou, Ivan Y. Tyukin et al.

Adversarial attacks dramatically change the output of an otherwise accurate learning system using a seemingly inconsequential modification to a piece of input data. Paradoxically, empirical evidence indicates that even systems which are robust to large random perturbations of the input data remain susceptible to small, easily constructed, adversarial perturbations of their inputs. Here, we show that this may be seen as a fundamental feature of classifiers working with high dimensional input data. We introduce a simple generic and generalisable framework for which key behaviours observed in practical systems arise with high probability -- notably the simultaneous susceptibility of the (otherwise accurate) model to easily constructed adversarial attacks, and robustness to random perturbations of the input data. We confirm that the same phenomena are directly observed in practical neural networks trained on standard image classification problems, where even large additive random noise fails to trigger the adversarial instability of the network. A surprising takeaway is that even small margins separating a classifier's decision surface from training and testing data can hide adversarial susceptibility from being detected using randomly sampled perturbations. Counterintuitively, using additive noise during training or testing is therefore inefficient for eradicating or detecting adversarial examples, and more demanding adversarial training is required.

8.8LGSep 13, 2023
The Boundaries of Verifiable Accuracy, Robustness, and Generalisation in Deep Learning

Alexander Bastounis, Alexander N. Gorban, Anders C. Hansen et al.

In this work, we assess the theoretical limitations of determining guaranteed stability and accuracy of neural networks in classification tasks. We consider classical distribution-agnostic framework and algorithms minimising empirical risks and potentially subjected to some weights regularisation. We show that there is a large family of tasks for which computing and verifying ideal stable and accurate neural networks in the above settings is extremely challenging, if at all possible, even when such ideal solutions exist within the given class of neural architectures.

7.7LGOct 10, 2023
Relative intrinsic dimensionality is intrinsic to learning

Oliver J. Sutton, Qinghua Zhou, Alexander N. Gorban et al.

High dimensional data can have a surprising property: pairs of data points may be easily separated from each other, or even from arbitrary subsets, with high probability using just simple linear classifiers. However, this is more of a rule of thumb than a reliable property as high dimensionality alone is neither necessary nor sufficient for successful learning. Here, we introduce a new notion of the intrinsic dimension of a data distribution, which precisely captures the separability properties of the data. For this intrinsic dimension, the rule of thumb above becomes a law: high intrinsic dimension guarantees highly separable data. We extend this notion to that of the relative intrinsic dimension of two data distributions, which we show provides both upper and lower bounds on the probability of successfully learning and generalising in a binary classification problem

5.8AIJun 18, 2024Code
Stealth edits to large language models

Oliver J. Sutton, Qinghua Zhou, Wei Wang et al.

We reveal the theoretical foundations of techniques for editing large language models, and present new methods which can do so without requiring retraining. Our theoretical insights show that a single metric (a measure of the intrinsic dimension of the model's features) can be used to assess a model's editability and reveals its previously unrecognised susceptibility to malicious stealth attacks. This metric is fundamental to predicting the success of a variety of editing approaches, and reveals new bridges between disparate families of editing methods. We collectively refer to these as stealth editing methods, because they directly update a model's weights to specify its response to specific known hallucinating prompts without affecting other model behaviour. By carefully applying our theoretical insights, we are able to introduce a new jet-pack network block which is optimised for highly selective model editing, uses only standard network operations, and can be inserted into existing networks. We also reveal the vulnerability of language models to stealth attacks: a small change to a model's weights which fixes its response to a single attacker-chosen prompt. Stealth attacks are computationally simple, do not require access to or knowledge of the model's training data, and therefore represent a potent yet previously unrecognised threat to redistributed foundation models. Extensive experimental results illustrate and support our methods and their theoretical underpinnings. Demos and source code are available at https://github.com/qinghua-zhou/stealth-edits.

4.6LGJan 31, 2024
Weakly Supervised Learners for Correction of AI Errors with Provable Performance Guarantees

Ivan Y. Tyukin, Tatiana Tyukina, Daniel van Helden et al.

We present a new methodology for handling AI errors by introducing weakly supervised AI error correctors with a priori performance guarantees. These AI correctors are auxiliary maps whose role is to moderate the decisions of some previously constructed underlying classifier by either approving or rejecting its decisions. The rejection of a decision can be used as a signal to suggest abstaining from making a decision. A key technical focus of the work is in providing performance guarantees for these new AI correctors through bounds on the probabilities of incorrect decisions. These bounds are distribution agnostic and do not rely on assumptions on the data dimension. Our empirical example illustrates how the framework can be applied to improve the performance of an image classifier in a challenging real-world task where training data are scarce.

8.4LGApr 25, 2021
Demystification of Few-shot and One-shot Learning

Ivan Y. Tyukin, Alexander N. Gorban, Muhammad H. Alkhudaydi et al.

Few-shot and one-shot learning have been the subject of active and intensive research in recent years, with mounting evidence pointing to successful implementation and exploitation of few-shot learning algorithms in practice. Classical statistical learning theories do not fully explain why few- or one-shot learning is at all possible since traditional generalisation bounds normally require large training and testing samples to be meaningful. This sharply contrasts with numerous examples of successful one- and few-shot learning systems and applications. In this work we present mathematical foundations for a theory of one-shot and few-shot learning and reveal conditions specifying when such learning schemes are likely to succeed. Our theory is based on intrinsic properties of high-dimensional spaces. We show that if the ambient or latent decision space of a learning machine is sufficiently high-dimensional than a large class of objects in this space can indeed be easily learned from few examples provided that certain data non-concentration conditions are met.