Edmund R. Hunt

Nicola Webb, Edmund R. Hunt

Integrating mobile robots into human teams promises significant capability improvements for tasks such as searching hazardous environments. Unlike existing teleoperated robots, future robot systems will increasingly be endowed with some level of artificial intelligence (AI), giving them a degree of autonomy in how they pursue mission goals. This autonomy could make a human-agent (robot) team more effective but also put inter-agent trust under strain if robots make a mistake, or (appear to) pursue task priorities that conflict with the team's best interest. During a mission, agents' trust states are anticipated to vary according to the situation as understood by each teammate (trustor). If component-level (agent) or system-level trust falls below sufficient levels for cooperative tasks to be completed, it could critically affect mission success . We argue that active trust management will be an important precondition for the success of human-robot teams (HRTs, a subcategory of human-agent teams with embodied agents), especially in dynamic, high-risk environments. We present a trust satisficing perspective which acknowledges and attempts to account for the fluctuating, multi-faceted, and context-dependent nature of trust and trust requirements even under normal operating conditions. Our outline of a trust management framework for human-robot teaming includes online measurement of proxy metrics for trust, closed-loop adaptation of robot behavior, and variable autonomy to give space for human responsibility in situations requiring value judgements. We refer to a recent experimental exploration of 'swift trust' and a novel behavioral trust metric for HRT, and we highlight issues for further investigation.

Edmund R. Hunt, Chris Baber, Mehdi Sobhani et al.

Defining and measuring trust in dynamic, multiagent teams is important in a range of contexts, particularly in defense and security domains. Team members should be trusted to work towards agreed goals and in accordance with shared values. In this paper, our concern is with the definition of goals and values such that it is possible to define 'trust' in a way that is interpretable, and hence usable, by both humans and robots. We argue that the outcome of team activity can be considered in terms of 'goal', 'individual/team values', and 'legal principles'. We question whether alignment is possible at the level of 'individual/team values', or only at the 'goal' and 'legal principles' levels. We argue for a set of metrics to define trust in human-robot teams that are interpretable by human or robot team members, and consider an experiment that could demonstrate the notion of 'satisficing trust' over the course of a simulated mission.

Ning Zhou, Nikolai W. F. Bode, Edmund R. Hunt

Multi-robot systems are integral to modern logistics, but their capabilities are often limited to tasks executable by individual agents. This paper addresses a critical gap in existing frameworks like Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) and Task Allocation and Path Finding (TAPF), which lack true cooperation for transporting large items that require multiple agents. To this end, we formalise the Cooperative Transportation Task Allocation and Path Finding (CT-TAPF) problem, which integrates team formation, task assignment, and collision-free pathfinding. We present an optimal solver, Cooperative Transportation Task Conflict-Based Search (CT-TCBS), which features a novel Incremental Expansion strategy to tackle the combinatorial explosion inherent in team formation. Recognising the computational cost of optimality, we also develop a family of sub-optimal solvers that employ a global, task-centric perspective, selecting the next task to assign based on a global difficulty metric (Best Task or Worst Task). Our comprehensive empirical evaluation demonstrates three key findings: (1) the incremental expansion strategy significantly outperforms the naive combinatorial approach by successfully pruning the dominant task-allocation search space; (2) we identify a task-conflict expansion dilemma, where sophisticated conflict resolvers effective for large-agent pathfinding subproblems can be detrimental in the integrated CT-TAPF setting; and (3) our proposed sub-optimal solvers establish a new, more efficient frontier on the solution quality-runtime spectrum compared to "nn-" agent-centric baselines. This work provides a foundational framework and a set of effective algorithms for a new, practical class of cooperative multi-agent problems.

Ning Zhou, Edmund R. Hunt, Nikolai W. F. Bode

As mobile service robots increasingly coexist with pedestrians, ensuring passively safe behaviour during confined emergency evacuations is critical. Existing multi-robot yielding strategies often focus solely on collision avoidance and macroscopic flow optimisation, overlooking environmental affordances and human spatial expectations. To bridge the gap between macroscopic theory and micro-level perception, we conducted a game-based virtual evacuation experiment (N=56). We investigated individual psychological responses to four multi-robot yielding strategies (Hide, LineEscape, Freeze, ShortestPath) across confined corridors with and without refuge niches. Our results establish a robust preference hierarchy (Hide > LineEscape > Freeze > ShortestPath), demonstrating that proactive space-yielding significantly outperforms freezing and efficiency-first approaches. Crucially, we found that environmental affordances heavily shape cognitive expectations. Actively utilising available niches amplifies the psychological comfort of proactive yielding (Hide). Conversely, failing to use an obvious niche (e.g., executing LineEscape) may trigger Expectation Violation. This is reflected in a drastically increased perceived cognitive delay, despite objectively unimpeded trajectories. Furthermore, prior robot interaction experience helps users decode complex social intents. Ultimately, this research demonstrates that safe human-robot interaction during emergencies must evolve from pure trajectory optimisation to semantically aware navigation. Future work will extend this framework to investigate complex interactions between robot swarms and pedestrian crowds.

James C. Ward, Alex Bott, Connor York et al.

Simulating hostile attacks of physical autonomous systems can be a useful tool to examine their robustness to attack and inform vulnerability-aware design. In this work, we examine this through the lens of multi-robot patrol, by presenting a machine learning-based adversary model that observes robot patrol behavior in order to attempt to gain undetected access to a secure environment within a limited time duration. Such a model allows for evaluation of a patrol system against a realistic potential adversary, offering insight into future patrol strategy design. We show that our new model outperforms existing baselines, thus providing a more stringent test, and examine its performance against multiple leading decentralized multi-robot patrol strategies.