Raffaele Scaringi

h-index4
2papers
49citations

2 Papers

10.5CVJul 2, 2024Code
Label Anything: Multi-Class Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation with Visual Prompts

Pasquale De Marinis, Nicola Fanelli, Raffaele Scaringi et al.

Few-shot semantic segmentation aims to segment objects from previously unseen classes using only a limited number of labeled examples. In this paper, we introduce Label Anything, a novel transformer-based architecture designed for multi-prompt, multi-way few-shot semantic segmentation. Our approach leverages diverse visual prompts -- points, bounding boxes, and masks -- to create a highly flexible and generalizable framework that significantly reduces annotation burden while maintaining high accuracy. Label Anything makes three key contributions: ($\textit{i}$) we introduce a new task formulation that relaxes conventional few-shot segmentation constraints by supporting various types of prompts, multi-class classification, and enabling multiple prompts within a single image; ($\textit{ii}$) we propose a novel architecture based on transformers and attention mechanisms; and ($\textit{iii}$) we design a versatile training procedure allowing our model to operate seamlessly across different $N$-way $K$-shot and prompt-type configurations with a single trained model. Our extensive experimental evaluation on the widely used COCO-$20^i$ benchmark demonstrates that Label Anything achieves state-of-the-art performance among existing multi-way few-shot segmentation methods, while significantly outperforming leading single-class models when evaluated in multi-class settings. Code and trained models are available at https://github.com/pasqualedem/LabelAnything.

CVJun 26
Understanding How MLLMs Describe Artworks Using Token Activation Maps

Nicola Fanelli, Pasquale De Marinis, Raffaele Scaringi et al.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) describe artworks with remarkable fluency, yet the visual reasoning behind their outputs remains opaque. When an MLLM names a style, identifies a subject, or recognizes an iconographic symbol, does it ground each claim in the relevant region of the canvas, draw on an undifferentiated visual signal, or rely primarily on textual priors? We study this using the Token Activation Map (TAM), which produces, for each generated token, a heatmap isolating the visual evidence specific to that token from prior-context interference. Applying TAM to a curated set of paintings spanning multiple periods and genres, we analyze grounding patterns across five semantically distinct token categories: common visual objects, style descriptors, metadata, iconographic tokens, and affective expressions. We find that visual grounding varies substantially with token semantics. We further show that MLLMs attempt to identify artworks and artists, achieving higher accuracy in artist attribution than in title prediction, where hallucinations are more frequent. Finally, we compare TAM with SAM~3 open-vocabulary segmentation. To ensure reproducibility, we release our code, experimental configurations, prompts, and qualitative results on the project page at https://nicolafan.github.io/tamart/.