Mohamed Amine Chatti

Mohamed Amine Chatti, Mouadh Guesmi, Laura Vorgerd et al.

Despite the acknowledgment that the perception of explanations may vary considerably between end-users, explainable recommender systems (RS) have traditionally followed a one-size-fits-all model, whereby the same explanation level of detail is provided to each user, without taking into consideration individual user's context, i.e., goals and personal characteristics. To fill this research gap, we aim in this paper at a shift from a one-size-fits-all to a personalized approach to explainable recommendation by giving users agency in deciding which explanation they would like to see. We developed a transparent Recommendation and Interest Modeling Application (RIMA) that provides on-demand personalized explanations of the recommendations, with three levels of detail (basic, intermediate, advanced) to meet the demands of different types of end-users. We conducted a within-subject study (N=31) to investigate the relationship between user's personal characteristics and the explanation level of detail, and the effects of these two variables on the perception of the explainable RS with regard to different explanation goals. Our results show that the perception of explainable RS with different levels of detail is affected to different degrees by the explanation goal and user type. Consequently, we suggested some theoretical and design guidelines to support the systematic design of explanatory interfaces in RS tailored to the user's context.

Qurat Ul Ain, Mohamed Amine Chatti, William Kana Tsoplefack et al.

Educational recommender systems (ERSs) are becoming increasingly important in enhancing educational outcomes and personalizing learning experiences by providing recommendations of personalized resources and activities to learners, tailored to their individual learning needs. While user control is widely assumed to improve user experience, the effects of different levels of control in ERSs remain underexplored. To address this gap, we designed and evaluated an interactive ERS within the MOOC platform CourseMapper, where learners could interact with the input (i.e., user profile), process (i.e., recommendation algorithm), and output (i.e., recommendations) of the system. We conducted a between-subjects user study (N=184) to examine how varying levels of user control in an ERS influenced users' perceptions of the recommendation goals of perceived control, transparency, trust, satisfaction, and perceived quality. Our results show that enabling users to build and refine their profile is sufficient to promote positive perceptions of the ERS, while additional control options mainly reinforce these impressions. Moreover, perceived control is the only goal significantly affected by providing different levels of user control in the ERS, with input control exerting the strongest influence. Furthermore, different levels of control affect transparency, trust, satisfaction, and perceived quality in distinct yet interconnected ways. Overall, the findings provide empirical evidence that user control positively shapes transparency, trust, satisfaction, and perceived quality, though to varying extents.

Mouadh Guesmi, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Shoeb Joarder et al.

Explainable recommender systems (RS) have traditionally followed a one-size-fits-all approach, delivering the same explanation level of detail to each user, without considering their individual needs and goals. Further, explanations in RS have so far been presented mostly in a static and non-interactive manner. To fill these research gaps, we aim in this paper to adopt a user-centered, interactive explanation model that provides explanations with different levels of detail and empowers users to interact with, control, and personalize the explanations based on their needs and preferences. We followed a user-centered approach to design interactive explanations with three levels of detail (basic, intermediate, and advanced) and implemented them in the transparent Recommendation and Interest Modeling Application (RIMA). We conducted a qualitative user study (N=14) to investigate the impact of providing interactive explanations with varying level of details on the users' perception of the explainable RS. Our study showed qualitative evidence that fostering interaction and giving users control in deciding which explanation they would like to see can meet the demands of users with different needs, preferences, and goals, and consequently can have positive effects on different crucial aspects in explainable recommendation, including transparency, trust, satisfaction, and user experience.

Clara Siepmann, Mohamed Amine Chatti

Trust is long recognized to be an important factor in Recommender Systems (RS). However, there are different perspectives on trust and different ways to evaluate it. Moreover, a link between trust and transparency is often assumed but not always further investigated. In this paper we first go through different understandings and measurements of trust in the AI and RS community, such as demonstrated and perceived trust. We then review the relationsships between trust and transparency, as well as mental models, and investigate different strategies to achieve transparency in RS such as explanation, exploration and exploranation (i.e., a combination of exploration and explanation). We identify a need for further studies to explore these concepts as well as the relationships between them.

Qurat Ul Ain, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Nasim Yazdian Varjani et al.

Explanations are central to improving transparency, trust, and user satisfaction in recommender systems (RS), yet it remains unclear how different explanation formats (visual vs. textual) are suited to users with different personal characteristics (PCs). To this end, we report a within-subject user study (n=54) comparing visual and textual explanations and examine how explanation format and PCs jointly influence perceived control, transparency, trust, and satisfaction in an educational recommender system (ERS). Using robust mixed-effects models, we analyze the moderating effects of a wide range of PCs, including Big Five traits, need for cognition, decision making style, visualization familiarity, and technical expertise. Our results show that a well-designed visual, simple, interactive, selective, easy to understand visualization that clearly and intuitively communicates how user preferences are linked to recommendations, fosters perceived control, transparency, appropriate trust, and satisfaction in the ERS for most users, independent of their PCs. Moreover, we derive a set of guidelines to support the effective design of explanations in ERSs.

Shoeb Joarder, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Louis Born

Self-Service Learning Analytics (SSLA) tools aim to support educational stakeholders in creating learning analytics indicators without requiring technical expertise. While such tools promise user control and trans- parency, their effectiveness and adoption depend critically on usability aspects. This paper presents a compre- hensive usability evaluation and improvement of the Indicator Editor, a no-code, exploratory SSLA tool that enables non-technical users to implement custom learning analytics indicators through a structured workflow. Using an iterative evaluation approach, we conduct an exploratory qualitative user study, usability inspections of high-fidelity prototypes, and a workshop-based evaluation in an authentic educational setting with n = 46 students using standardized instruments, namely System Usability Scale (SUS), User Experience Question- naire (UEQ), and Net Promoter Score (NPS). Based on the evaluation findings, we derive concrete design implications that inform improvements in workflow guidance, feedback, and information presentation in the Indicator Editor. Furthermore, our evaluation provides practical insights for the design of usable SSLA tools.

Qurat Ul Ain, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Jean Qussa et al.

The automatic construction of Educational Knowledge Graphs (EduKGs) is essential for domain knowledge modeling by extracting meaningful representations from learning materials. Despite growing interest, identifying a scalable and reliable approach for automatic EduKG generation remains a challenge. In an attempt to develop a unified and robust pipeline for automatic EduKG construction, in this study we propose a pipeline for automatic EduKG construction from PDF learning materials. The process begins with generating slide-level EduKGs from individual pages/slides, which are then merged to form a comprehensive EduKG representing the entire learning material. We evaluate the accuracy of the EduKG generated from the proposed pipeline in our MOOC platform, CourseMapper. The observed accuracy, while indicative of partial success, is relatively low particularly in the educational context, where the reliability of knowledge representations is critical for supporting meaningful learning. To address this, we introduce targeted optimizations across multiple pipeline components. The optimized pipeline achieves a 17.5% improvement in accuracy and a tenfold increase in processing efficiency. Our approach offers a holistic, scalable and end-to-end pipeline for automatic EduKG construction, adaptable to diverse educational contexts, and supports improved semantic representation of learning content.

Rawaa Alatrash, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Nasha Wibowo et al.

Educational Knowledge Graphs (EduKGs) organize various learning entities and their relationships to support structured and adaptive learning. Prerequisite relationships (PRs) are critical in EduKGs for defining the logical order in which concepts should be learned. However, the current EduKG in the MOOC platform CourseMapper lacks explicit PR links, and manually annotating them is time-consuming and inconsistent. To address this, we propose an unsupervised method for automatically inferring concept PRs without relying on labeled data. We define ten criteria based on document-based, Wikipedia hyperlink-based, graph-based, and text-based features, and combine them using a voting algorithm to robustly capture PRs in educational content. Experiments on benchmark datasets show that our approach achieves higher precision than existing methods while maintaining scalability and adaptability, thus providing reliable support for sequence-aware learning in CourseMapper.

Mohamed Abdelmagied, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Shoeb Joarder et al.

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) lack direct interaction between learners and instructors, making it challenging for learners to understand new knowledge concepts. Recently, learners have increasingly used Large Language Models (LLMs) to support them in acquiring new knowledge. However, LLMs are prone to hallucinations which limits their reliability. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this issue by retrieving relevant documents before generating a response. However, the application of RAG across different MOOCs is limited by unstructured learning material. Furthermore, current RAG systems do not actively guide learners toward their learning needs. To address these challenges, we propose a Graph RAG pipeline that leverages Educational Knowledge Graphs (EduKGs) and Personal Knowledge Graphs (PKGs) to guide learners to understand knowledge concepts in the MOOC platform CourseMapper. Specifically, we implement (1) a PKG-based Question Generation method to recommend personalized questions for learners in context, and (2) an EduKG-based Question Answering method that leverages the relationships between knowledge concepts in the EduKG to answer learner selected questions. To evaluate both methods, we conducted a study with 3 expert instructors on 3 different MOOCs in the MOOC platform CourseMapper. The results of the evaluation show the potential of Graph RAG to empower learners to understand new knowledge concepts in a personalized learning experience.

Mouadh Guesmi, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Shoeb Joarder et al.

Significant attention has been paid to enhancing recommender systems (RS) with explanation facilities to help users make informed decisions and increase trust in and satisfaction with the RS. Justification and transparency represent two crucial goals in explainable recommendation. Different from transparency, which faithfully exposes the reasoning behind the recommendation mechanism, justification conveys a conceptual model that may differ from that of the underlying algorithm. An explanation is an answer to a question. In explainable recommendation, a user would want to ask questions (referred to as intelligibility types) to understand results given by the RS. In this paper, we identify relationships between Why and How explanation intelligibility types and the explanation goals of justification and transparency. We followed the Human-Centered Design (HCD) approach and leveraged the What-Why-How visualization framework to systematically design and implement Why and How visual explanations in the transparent Recommendation and Interest Modeling Application (RIMA). Furthermore, we conducted a qualitative user study (N=12) to investigate the potential effects of providing Why and How explanations together in an explainable RS on the users' perceptions regarding transparency, trust, and satisfaction. Our study showed qualitative evidence confirming that the choice of the explanation intelligibility types depends on the explanation goal and user type.

Mohamed Amine Chatti, Mouadh Guesmi, Arham Muslim

Providing system-generated explanations for recommendations represents an important step towards transparent and trustworthy recommender systems. Explainable recommender systems provide a human-understandable rationale for their outputs. Over the last two decades, explainable recommendation has attracted much attention in the recommender systems research community. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of research efforts on visual explanation in recommender systems. More concretely, we systematically review the literature on explanations in recommender systems based on four dimensions, namely explanation goal, explanation scope, explanation style, and explanation format. Recognizing the importance of visualization, we approach the recommender system literature from the angle of explanatory visualizations, that is using visualizations as a display style of explanation. As a result, we derive a set of guidelines that might be constructive for designing explanatory visualizations in recommender systems and identify perspectives for future work in this field. The aim of this review is to help recommendation researchers and practitioners better understand the potential of visually explainable recommendation research and to support them in the systematic design of visual explanations in current and future recommender systems.