3.8LGMar 10, 2023
On the Fusion Strategies for Federated Decision MakingMert Kayaalp, Yunus Inan, Visa Koivunen et al.
We consider the problem of information aggregation in federated decision making, where a group of agents collaborate to infer the underlying state of nature without sharing their private data with the central processor or each other. We analyze the non-Bayesian social learning strategy in which agents incorporate their individual observations into their opinions (i.e., soft-decisions) with Bayes rule, and the central processor aggregates these opinions by arithmetic or geometric averaging. Building on our previous work, we establish that both pooling strategies result in asymptotic normality characterization of the system, which, for instance, can be utilized to derive approximate expressions for the error probability. We verify the theoretical findings with simulations and compare both strategies.
8.2ITJul 9
On the suboptimality of linear codes for binary distributed hypothesis testingAdway Girish, Robinson D. H. Cung, Emre Telatar
We study a binary distributed hypothesis testing problem where two agents observe correlated binary vectors and communicate compressed information at the same rate to a central decision maker. In particular, we study linear compression schemes and show that simple truncation is the best linear scheme in two cases: (1) testing opposite signs of the same magnitude of correlation, and (2) testing for or against independence. We conjecture, supported by numerical evidence, that truncation is the best linear code for testing any correlations of opposite signs. Further, for testing against independence, we also compute classical random coding exponents and show that truncation, and consequently any linear code, is strictly suboptimal.
7.5ITMar 16
Space Upper Bounds for $α$-Perfect HashingRyan Song, Emre Telatar
In the problem of perfect hashing, we are given a size $k$ subset $\mathcal{A}$ of a universe of keys $[n] = \{1,2, \cdots, n\}$, for which we wish to construct a hash function $h: [n] \to [b]$ such that $h(\cdot)$ maps $\mathcal{A}$ to $[b]$ with no collisions, i.e., the restriction of $h(\cdot)$ to $\mathcal{A}$ is injective. When $b=k$, the problem is referred to as minimal perfect hashing. In this paper, we extend the study of minimal perfect hashing to the approximate setting. For some $α\in [0, 1]$, we say that a randomized hashing scheme is $α$-perfect if for any input $\mathcal{A}$ of size $k$, it outputs a hash function which exhibits at most $(1-α)k$ collisions on $\mathcal{A}$ in expectation. One important performance consideration for any hashing scheme is the space required to store the hash functions. For minimal perfect hashing, i.e., $b = k$, it is well known that approximately $k\log(e)$ bits, or $\log(e)$ bits per key, is required to store the hash function. In this paper, we propose schemes for constructing minimal $α$-perfect hash functions and analyze their space requirements. We begin by presenting a simple base-line scheme which randomizes between perfect hashing and zero-bit random hashing. We then present a more sophisticated hashing scheme based on sampling which significantly improves upon the space requirement of the aforementioned strategy for all values of $α$.