Heesang Ann

Heesang Ann, Joongkyu Lee, Min-hwan Oh

Vector quantization is a fundamental primitive for scalable machine learning systems, enabling memory-efficient storage, fast retrieval, and compressed inference. Recent rotation-based quantizers such as EDEN, RabitQ, and TurboQuant have introduced strong guarantees and empirical performance, but the surrounding comparisons have been difficult to interpret because they rely on different distortion criteria, probability regimes, and implementation assumptions. As our first contribution, we provide a unified theoretical comparison of these methods and show that their relative advantages are criterion-dependent rather than absolute: EDEN and TurboQuant are favorable for MSE distortion, EDEN is also effective for expected inner-product distortion, and RabitQ provides strong high-probability control. This comparison further clarifies that EDEN provides particularly strong guarantees for expected distortion measures. As our second contribution, we introduce Block-Sphere Quantization (BlockQuant), a new rotation-based block quantization algorithm designed around the spherical geometry of randomly rotated vectors. Unlike coordinate-wise quantizers, BlockQuant quantizes blocks on the sphere, preserving the geometry of rotated embeddings more faithfully. We prove that this block-spherical design theoretically improves over the baselines considered in this paper for both reconstruction MSE and expected inner-product distortion. Our experiments on real embedding datasets and long-context LLM inference tasks show practical gains that are consistent with our theoretical improvements.

Somangchan Park, Heesang Ann, Min-hwan Oh

We study the multi-objective linear contextual bandit problem, where multiple possible conflicting objectives must be optimized simultaneously. We propose \texttt{MOL-TS}, the \textit{first} Thompson Sampling algorithm with Pareto regret guarantees for this problem. Unlike standard approaches that compute an empirical Pareto front each round, \texttt{MOL-TS} samples parameters across objectives and efficiently selects an arm from a novel \emph{effective Pareto front}, which accounts for repeated selections over time. Our analysis shows that \texttt{MOL-TS} achieves a worst-case Pareto regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(d^{3/2}\sqrt{T})$, where $d$ is the dimension of the feature vectors, $T$ is the total number of rounds, matching the best known order for randomized linear bandit algorithms for single objective. Empirical results confirm the benefits of our proposed approach, demonstrating improved regret minimization and strong multi-objective performance.

Heesang Ann, Min-hwan Oh

The multi objective bandit setting has traditionally been regarded as more complex than the single objective case, as multiple objectives must be optimized simultaneously. In contrast to this prevailing view, we demonstrate that when multiple good arms exist for multiple objectives, they can induce a surprising benefit, implicit exploration. Under this condition, we show that simple algorithms that greedily select actions in most rounds can nonetheless achieve strong performance, both theoretically and empirically. To our knowledge, this is the first study to introduce implicit exploration in both multi objective and parametric bandit settings without any distributional assumptions on the contexts. We further introduce a framework for effective Pareto fairness, which provides a principled approach to rigorously analyzing fairness of multi objective bandit algorithms.