Adrien Lagrange

Adrien Lagrange, Mathieu Fauvel, Stéphane May et al.

Supervised classification and representation learning are two widely used classes of methods to analyze multivariate images. Although complementary, these methods have been scarcely considered jointly in a hierarchical modeling. In this paper, a method coupling these two approaches is designed using a matrix cofactorization formulation. Each task is modeled as a factorization matrix problem and a term relating both coding matrices is then introduced to drive an appropriate coupling. The link can be interpreted as a clustering operation over a low-dimensional representation vectors. The attribution vectors of the clustering are then used as features vectors for the classification task, i.e., the coding vectors of the corresponding factorization problem. A proximal gradient descent algorithm, ensuring convergence to a critical point of the objective function, is then derived to solve the resulting non-convex non-smooth optimization problem. An evaluation of the proposed method is finally conducted both on synthetic and real data in the specific context of hyperspectral image interpretation, unifying two standard analysis techniques, namely unmixing and classification.

Adrien Lagrange, Mathieu Fauvel, Stéphane May et al.

Within a supervised classification framework, labeled data are used to learn classifier parameters. Prior to that, it is generally required to perform dimensionality reduction via feature extraction. These preprocessing steps have motivated numerous research works aiming at recovering latent variables in an unsupervised context. This paper proposes a unified framework to perform classification and low-level modeling jointly. The main objective is to use the estimated latent variables as features for classification and to incorporate simultaneously supervised information to help latent variable extraction. The proposed hierarchical Bayesian model is divided into three stages: a first low-level modeling stage to estimate latent variables, a second stage clustering these features into statistically homogeneous groups and a last classification stage exploiting the (possibly badly) labeled data. Performance of the model is assessed in the specific context of hyperspectral image interpretation, unifying two standard analysis techniques, namely unmixing and classification.