D Ellis Hershkowitz

Kishen N Gowda, Willem Fletcher, MohammadHossein Bateni et al.

Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC) is a widely-used clustering method based on repeatedly merging the closest pair of clusters, where inter-cluster distances are determined by a linkage function. Unlike many clustering methods, HAC does not optimize a single explicit global objective; clustering quality is therefore primarily evaluated empirically, and the choice of linkage function plays a crucial role in practice. However, popular classical linkages, such as single-linkage, average-linkage and Ward's method show high variability across real-world datasets and do not consistently produce high-quality clusterings in practice. In this paper, we propose \emph{Chamfer-linkage}, a novel linkage function that measures the distance between clusters using the Chamfer distance, a popular notion of distance between point-clouds in machine learning and computer vision. We argue that Chamfer-linkage satisfies desirable concept representation properties that other popular measures struggle to satisfy. Theoretically, we show that Chamfer-linkage HAC can be implemented in $O(n^2)$ time, matching the efficiency of classical linkage functions. Experimentally, we find that Chamfer-linkage consistently yields higher-quality clusterings than classical linkages such as average-linkage and Ward's method across a diverse collection of datasets. Our results establish Chamfer-linkage as a practical drop-in replacement for classical linkage functions, broadening the toolkit for hierarchical clustering in both theory and practice.

Kishen N Gowda, D Ellis Hershkowitz, Richard Z Huang et al.

Allocating $m$ indivisible goods among $n$ agents is a fundamental task in fair division. Recent work of Garg and Psomas [AAMAS 2025] initiated the study of parallel algorithms for envy-free up to one good (EF1) allocations, giving NC algorithms for $2$ and $3$ agents. They also showed CC-hardness results for simulating the classic Round Robin algorithm for EF1 allocations, even when each agent values at most $3$ goods and each good is valued by at most $3$ agents. We strengthen these results. For the case of $2$ agents, we quadratically improve the depth from $O(\log ^ 2 m) $ to $O(\log m)$ and the work from $O(m \log m)$ to $O(m)$. Furthermore, we significantly generalize beyond $3$ agents by giving NC algorithms for any constant number of agents. We also give randomized algorithms with depth $\tilde{O}(m/n)$ and polynomial work. As corollaries of these results, we obtain NC algorithms whenever each agent values at most $polylog(m)$ goods and each good is valued by at most $O(1)$ agents, and RNC algorithms when each agent values at most $polylog(m)$ goods. As such, our algorithms bypass the CC-hardness of Garg and Psomas by not simulating Round Robin. We also complement the aforementioned CC-hardness by showing the CC-completeness of simulating Round Robin. Lastly, beyond EF1 allocations, we show that computing envy-free up to $k$ goods allocations is possible for $k \approx \sqrt{m}$ in RNC, or $k = m^{\varepsilon}$ in sublinear depth for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$.

Yuu Jinnai, David Abel, D Ellis Hershkowitz et al.

We formalize the problem of selecting the optimal set of options for planning as that of computing the smallest set of options so that planning converges in less than a given maximum of value-iteration passes. We first show that the problem is NP-hard, even if the task is constrained to be deterministic---the first such complexity result for option discovery. We then present the first polynomial-time boundedly suboptimal approximation algorithm for this setting, and empirically evaluate it against both the optimal options and a representative collection of heuristic approaches in simple grid-based domains including the classic four-rooms problem.