Pawel Batorski

Pawel Batorski, Abtin Pourhadi, Jerzy Sarosiek et al.

Large language models are highly sensitive to prompts, but this sensitivity is usually studied through task-relevant instructions, demonstrations, or reasoning cues. In this paper, we study a different form of prompt sensitivity: whether prompts that are semantically unrelated to the task can nevertheless steer model behavior. We call them spurious prompts and show their surprising efficacy. We also propose a simple black-box search procedure for discovering them. Across reasoning and question-answering benchmarks, using models ranging from 0.8B to 27B parameters and spanning three model families, we show that spurious prompts can improve performance, often matching or outperforming standard prompting baselines and task-aware prompt optimization. We further show that they can steer models toward unintended behaviors, such as repeatedly selecting the first answer option, producing incorrect answers, returning an even, prime or small number without explicitly instructing the model to do so. These findings reveal a new kind of prompt sensitivity: LLMs can be systematically steered by prompts that are unrelated to the task they are asked to solve. Our code is available at https://github.com/Batorskq/spurious

Pawel Batorski, Paul Swoboda

In-context learning (ICL) adapts large language models by conditioning on a small set of ICL examples, avoiding costly parameter updates. Among other factors, performance is often highly sensitive to the ordering of the examples. However, exhaustive search over the $n!$ possible orderings is infeasible. Therefore more efficient ordering methods use model confidence measures (e.g., label-probability entropy) over label sets or take a direct approach to finding the best ordering. We propose PLR, a probabilistic approach to in-context example ordering that replaces discrete ordering search with learning a probability distribution over orderings with the Plackett-Luce model. PLR models orderings using a Plackett-Luce distribution and iteratively updates its parameters to concentrate probability mass on high-performing orderings under a task-level metric. Candidate orderings are sampled efficiently via a Gumbel perturb-and-sort procedure. Experiments on multiple classification benchmarks show that PLR consistently improves few-shot accuracy for $k \in \{4, 8, 16, 32\}$ examples, and we further demonstrate gains on mathematical reasoning tasks where label-based ordering methods are not applicable. Our code is available at https://github.com/Batorskq/PLR.

Pawel Batorski, Paul Swoboda

Machine unlearning aims to unlearn specified training data (e.g. sensitive or copyrighted material). A prominent approach is to fine-tune an existing model with an unlearning loss that retains overall utility. The space of suitable unlearning loss functions is vast, making the search for an optimal loss function daunting. Additionally, there might not even exist a universally optimal loss function: differences in the structure and overlap of the forget and retain data can cause a loss to work well in one setting but over-unlearn or under-unlearn in another. Our approach EvoMU tackles these two challenges simultaneously. An evolutionary search procedure automatically finds task-specific losses in the vast space of possible unlearning loss functions. This allows us to find dataset-specific losses that match or outperform existing losses from the literature, without the need for a human-in-the-loop. This work is therefore an instance of automatic scientific discovery, a.k.a. an AI co-scientist. In contrast to previous AI co-scientist works, we do so on a budget: We achieve SotA results using a small 4B parameter model (Qwen3-4B-Thinking), showing the potential of AI co-scientists with limited computational resources. Our experimental evaluation shows that we surpass previous loss-based unlearning formulations on TOFU-5%, TOFU-10%, MUSE and WMDP by synthesizing novel unlearning losses. Our code is available at https://github.com/Batorskq/EvoMU.

Pawel Batorski, Paul Swoboda

LLMs are highly sensitive to prompt design, but handcrafting effective prompts is difficult and often requires intricate crafting of few-shot examples. We propose a fast automatic prompt construction algorithm that augments human instructions by generating a small set of few shot examples. Our method iteratively replaces/drops/keeps few-shot examples using Monte Carlo Shapley estimation of example utility. For faster execution, we use aggressive subsampling and a replay buffer for faster evaluations. Our method can be run using different compute time budgets. On a limited budget, we outperform existing automatic prompting methods on text simplification and GSM8K and obtain second best results on classification and summarization. With an extended, but still modest compute budget we set a new state of the art among automatic prompting methods on classification, simplification and GSM8K. Our results show that carefully constructed examples, rather than exhaustive instruction search, are the dominant lever for fast and data efficient prompt engineering. Our code is available at https://github.com/Batorskq/PIAST.