Riender Happee

Xiaolin He, Zirui Li, Xinwei Wang et al.

Perceived risk in automated driving is often measured as discrete scores that summarise riding experience but this obscures volatile peaks from sustained elevation. Here we treat discrete clipwise ratings as constraints on an unobserved inferred evolution and apply a kernel constrained inverse model to infer the temporal evolution of perceived risk. Across 2,164 participants and 141,628 discrete clipwise ratings spanning 236 hours of scripted motorway interactions, we infer evolutions under kernel constraints whose shapes follow priors from independent handset-based ratings and whose timing is fixed by scripted manoeuvre markers. The inferred perceived risk evolutions differentiate accumulated perceived risk from within clip concentration, revealing scenario differences that are not identifiable from peak judgements alone. We then map these inferred evolutions from observable vehicle and relative motion cues under strict event level holdout using a deep neural network, enabling interpretable attribution analyses. Attribution shows distinct patterns between risk rising and falling segments, with a shift toward conflict cues in the rising phase, and a rebound toward stability cues in the falling phase. Attribution concentration increases only modestly at high perceived risk levels. These results move beyond treating perceived risk as a single severity score by characterising within episode dynamics and phase dependent cue associations in scripted motorway interactions.

Abel van Elburg, Konstantinos Gkentsidis, Mathieu Sarrazin et al.

Trust and perceived safety play a crucial role in the public acceptance of automated vehicles. To understand perceived risk, an experiment was conducted using a driving simulator under two automated driving styles and optionally introducing a crossing pedestrian. Data was collected from 32 participants, consisting of continuous subjective comfort ratings, motion, webcam footage for facial expression, skin conductance, heart rate, and eye tracking. The continuous subjective perceived risk ratings showed significant discomfort associated with perceived risk during cornering and braking followed by relief or even positive comfort on continuing the ride. The dynamic driving style induced a stronger discomfort as compared to the calm driving style. The crossing pedestrian did not affect discomfort with the calm driving style but doubled the comfort decrement with the dynamic driving style. This illustrates the importance of consequences of critical interactions in risk perception. Facial expression was successfully analyzed for 24 participants but most (15/24) did not show any detectable facial reaction to the critical event. Among the 9 participants who did, 8 showed a Happy expression, and only 4 showed a Surprise expression. Fear was never dominant. This indicates that facial expression recognition is not a reliable method for assessing perceived risk in automated vehicles. To predict perceived risk a neural network model was implemented using vehicle motion and skin conductance. The model correlated well with reported perceived risk, demonstrating its potential for objective perceived risk assessment in automated vehicles, reducing subjective bias and highlighting areas for future research.