Dries F. Benoit

Arthur Thuy, Ekaterina Loginova, Dries F. Benoit

In recent years, there has been a surge in research on Question Difficulty Estimation (QDE) using natural language processing techniques. Transformer-based neural networks achieve state-of-the-art performance, primarily through supervised methods but with an isolated study in unsupervised learning. While supervised methods focus on predictive performance, they require abundant labeled data. On the other hand, unsupervised methods do not require labeled data but rely on a different evaluation metric that is also computationally expensive in practice. This work bridges the research gap by exploring active learning for QDE, a supervised human-in-the-loop approach striving to minimize the labeling efforts while matching the performance of state-of-the-art models. The active learning process iteratively trains on a labeled subset, acquiring labels from human experts only for the most informative unlabeled data points. Furthermore, we propose a novel acquisition function PowerVariance to add the most informative samples to the labeled set, a regression extension to the PowerBALD function popular in classification. We employ DistilBERT for QDE and identify informative samples by applying Monte Carlo dropout to capture epistemic uncertainty in unlabeled samples. The experiments demonstrate that active learning with PowerVariance acquisition achieves a performance close to fully supervised models after labeling only 10% of the training data. The proposed methodology promotes the responsible use of educational resources, makes QDE tools more accessible to course instructors, and is promising for other applications such as personalized support systems and question-answering tools.

Matteo Ballegeer, Dries F. Benoit

Predicting the manufacturability of CAD designs early, in terms of both feasibility and required effort, is a key goal of Design for Manufacturing (DFM). Despite advances in deep learning for CAD and its widespread use in manufacturing process selection, learning-based approaches for predicting manufacturability within a specific process remain limited. Two key challenges limit progress: inconsistency across prior work in how manufacturability is defined and consequently in the associated learning targets, and a scarcity of suitable datasets. Existing labels vary significantly: they may reflect intrinsic design constraints or depend on specific manufacturing capabilities (such as available tools), and they range from discrete feasibility checks to continuous complexity measures. Furthermore, industrial datasets typically contain only manufacturable parts, offering little signal for infeasible cases, while existing synthetic datasets focus on simple geometries and subtractive processes. To address these gaps, we propose a taxonomy of manufacturability metrics along the axes of configuration dependence and measurement type, allowing clearer scoping of generalizability and learning objectives. Next, we introduce BenDFM, the first synthetic dataset for manufacturability assessment in sheet metal bending. BenDFM contains 20,000 parts, both manufacturable and unmanufacturable, generated with process-aware bending simulations, providing both folded and unfolded geometries and multiple manufacturability labels across the taxonomy, enabling systematic study of previously unexplored learning-based DFM challenges. We benchmark two state-of-the-art 3D learning architectures on BenDFM, showing that graph-based representations that capture relationships between part surfaces achieve better accuracy, and that predicting metrics that depend on specific manufacturing setups remains more challenging.

Matteo Ballegeer, Toon Van Camp, Willem Jaspers et al.

Graph-based machine learning has emerged as a promising approach for manufacturability analysis by learning directly from CAD models represented as Boundary Representations (B-reps), exploiting both surface geometry and topological connectivity. However, purely geometric representations often lack the process-specific semantics required for accurate manufacturability prediction: many manufacturing factors, such as surface roles or bend intent, are not explicitly encoded in shape alone and are difficult for data-driven models to infer reliably. We propose a hybrid approach that addresses this challenge by enriching B-rep attributed adjacency graphs with manufacturing features recognized through a rule-based module. Applied to sheet metal bending, recognized features, such as bend characteristics, flange lengths, and surface roles are integrated as node attributes, concentrating the learning signal on process-relevant geometric patterns. Experiments on both a large-scale synthetic manufacturability benchmark and a real-world industrial dataset with measured bending times, one of the first such validations on genuine production data, demonstrate that combining domain knowledge with graph-based learning improves prediction accuracy across both tasks. The results demonstrate that hybrid modeling offers a feasible and effective path toward deployable tools for manufacturability assessment and effort estimation in industrial CAD environments.

Arthur Thuy, Dries F. Benoit

Uncertainty is a key feature of any machine learning model and is particularly important in neural networks, which tend to be overconfident. This overconfidence is worrying under distribution shifts, where the model performance silently degrades as the data distribution diverges from the training data distribution. Uncertainty estimation offers a solution to overconfident models, communicating when the output should (not) be trusted. Although methods for uncertainty estimation have been developed, they have not been explicitly linked to the field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Furthermore, literature in operations research ignores the actionability component of uncertainty estimation and does not consider distribution shifts. This work proposes a general uncertainty framework, with contributions being threefold: (i) uncertainty estimation in ML models is positioned as an XAI technique, giving local and model-specific explanations; (ii) classification with rejection is used to reduce misclassifications by bringing a human expert in the loop for uncertain observations; (iii) the framework is applied to a case study on neural networks in educational data mining subject to distribution shifts. Uncertainty as XAI improves the model's trustworthiness in downstream decision-making tasks, giving rise to more actionable and robust machine learning systems in operations research.

Lukas De Kerpel, Arthur Thuy, Dries F. Benoit

In recent years, instructional practices in Operations Research (OR), Management Science (MS), and Analytics have increasingly shifted toward digital environments, where large and diverse groups of learners make it difficult to provide practice that adapts to individual needs. This paper introduces a method that generates personalized sequences of exercises by selecting, at each step, the exercise most likely to advance a learner's understanding of a targeted skill. The method uses information about the learner and their past performance to guide these choices, and learning progress is measured as the change in estimated skill level before and after each exercise. Using data from an online mathematics tutoring platform, we find that the approach recommends exercises associated with greater skill improvement and adapts effectively to differences across learners. From an instructional perspective, the framework enables personalized practice at scale, highlights exercises with consistently strong learning value, and helps instructors identify learners who may benefit from additional support.

Matteo Ballegeer, Matthias Bogaert, Dries F. Benoit

Instance-dependent cost-sensitive (IDCS) classifiers offer a promising approach to improving cost-efficiency in credit scoring by tailoring loss functions to instance-specific costs. However, the impact of such loss functions on the stability of model explanations remains unexplored in literature, despite increasing regulatory demands for transparency. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the stability of Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) when applied to IDCS models. Using four publicly available credit scoring datasets, we first assess the discriminatory power and cost-efficiency of IDCS classifiers, introducing a novel metric to enhance cross-dataset comparability. We then investigate the stability of SHAP and LIME feature importance rankings under varying degrees of class imbalance through controlled resampling. Our results reveal that while IDCS classifiers improve cost-efficiency, they produce significantly less stable explanations compared to traditional models, particularly as class imbalance increases, highlighting a critical trade-off between cost optimization and interpretability in credit scoring. Amid increasing regulatory scrutiny on explainability, this research underscores the pressing need to address stability issues in IDCS classifiers to ensure that their cost advantages are not undermined by unstable or untrustworthy explanations.

Arthur Thuy, Dries F. Benoit

Image classification with neural networks (NNs) is widely used in industrial processes, situations where the model likely encounters unknown objects during deployment, i.e., out-of-distribution (OOD) data. Worryingly, NNs tend to make confident yet incorrect predictions when confronted with OOD data. To increase the models' reliability, they should quantify the uncertainty in their own predictions, communicating when the output should (not) be trusted. Deep ensembles, composed of multiple independent NNs, have been shown to perform strongly but are computationally expensive. Recent research has proposed more efficient NN ensembles, namely the snapshot, batch, and multi-input multi-output ensemble. This study investigates the predictive and uncertainty performance of efficient NN ensembles in the context of image classification for industrial processes. It is the first to provide a comprehensive comparison and it proposes a novel Diversity Quality metric to quantify the ensembles' performance on the in-distribution and OOD sets in one single metric. The results highlight the batch ensemble as a cost-effective and competitive alternative to the deep ensemble. It matches the deep ensemble in both uncertainty and accuracy while exhibiting considerable savings in training time, test time, and memory storage.

Arthur Thuy, Ekaterina Loginova, Dries F. Benoit

Recent years have seen growing interest in Question Difficulty Estimation (QDE) using natural language processing techniques. Question difficulty is often represented using discrete levels, framing the task as ordinal regression due to the inherent ordering from easiest to hardest. However, the literature has neglected the ordinal nature of the task, relying on classification or discretized regression models, with specialized ordinal regression methods remaining unexplored. Furthermore, evaluation metrics are tightly coupled to the modeling paradigm, hindering cross-study comparability. While some metrics fail to account for the ordinal structure of difficulty levels, none adequately address class imbalance, resulting in biased performance assessments. This study addresses these limitations by benchmarking three types of model outputs -- discretized regression, classification, and ordinal regression -- using the balanced Discrete Ranked Probability Score (DRPS), a novel metric that jointly captures ordinality and class imbalance. In addition to using popular ordinal regression methods, we propose OrderedLogitNN, extending the ordered logit model from econometrics to neural networks. We fine-tune BERT on the RACE++ and ARC datasets and find that OrderedLogitNN performs considerably better on complex tasks. The balanced DRPS offers a robust and fair evaluation metric for discrete-level QDE, providing a principled foundation for future research.