Omer Gurewitz

Asaf Cohen, Dennis Goeckel, Omer Gurewitz et al.

Consider a communication network with a source, a relay and a destination. Each time interval, the source may dynamically choose between a few possible coding schemes, based on the channel state, traffic pattern and its own queue status. For example, the source may choose between a direct route to the destination and a relay-assisted scheme. Clearly, due to the difference in the performance achieved, as well as the resources each scheme uses, a sender might wish to choose the most appropriate one based on its status. In this work, we formulate the problem as a Semi-Markov Decision Process. This formulation allows us to find an optimal policy, expressed as a function of the number of packets in the source queue and other parameters. In particular, we show a general solution which covers various configurations, including different packet size distributions and varying channels. Furthermore, for the case of exponential transmission times, we analytically prove the optimal policy has a threshold structure, that is, there is a unique value of a single parameter which determines which scheme (or route) is optimal. Results are also validated with simulations for several interesting models.

George Vershinin, Asaf Cohen, Omer Gurewitz

We study a variant of cost-aware sequential hypothesis testing in which a single active Decision Maker (DM) selects actions with positive, random costs to identify the true hypothesis under an average error constraint, while minimizing the expected total cost. The DM may abort an in-progress action, yielding no sample, by truncating its realized cost at a smaller, tunable deterministic limit, which we term a per-action deadline. We analyze how this cancellation option can be exploited under two cost-revelation models: ex-post, where the cost is revealed only after the sample is obtained, and ex-ante, where the cost accrues before sample acquisition. In the ex-post model, per-action deadlines do not affect the expected total cost, and the cost-error tradeoffs coincide with the baseline obtained by replacing deterministic costs with cost means. In the ex-ante model, we show how per-action deadlines inflate the expected number of times actions are applied, and that the resulting expected total cost can be reduced to the constant-cost setting by introducing an effective per-action cost. We characterize when deadlines are beneficial and study several families in detail.