Jichao Xie

Xinlei Liu, Tao Hu, Jichao Xie et al.

Gradient-based attacks are important methods for evaluating model robustness. However, since the proposal of APGD, it has been difficult for such methods to achieve significant breakthroughs. To achieve such an effect, we first analyze the issue of "high-loss non-adversarial examples" that degrades attack performance in previous methods, and prove that this issue arises from inappropriate objectives for adversarial example generation. Subsequently, we reconstruct the objective as "maximizing the difference between the non-ground-truth label probability upper bound and the ground-truth label probability", and proposes a novel and powerful gradient-based attack method named Sequential Difference Maximization (SDM). SDM establishes a three-layer optimization framework of "cycle-stage-step". It adopts the negative probability loss function and the Directional Probability Difference Ratio (DPDR) loss function in the initial and subsequent optimization stages, respectively, and approaches the ideal objective of adversarial example generation via stage-wise sequential optimization. Experiments demonstrate that compared with previous state-of-the-art methods, SDM not only achieves stronger attack performance but also exhibits superior cost-effectiveness. The code is available at https://github.com/X-L-Liu/ICML-SDM.

Xinlei Liu, Tao Hu, Peng Yi et al.

Efficient adversarial attack methods are critical for assessing the robustness of computer vision models. In this paper, we reconstruct the optimization objective for generating adversarial examples as "maximizing the difference between the non-true labels' probability upper bound and the true label's probability," and propose a gradient-based attack method termed Sequential Difference Maximization (SDM). SDM establishes a three-layer optimization framework of "cycle-stage-step." The processes between cycles and between iterative steps are respectively identical, while optimization stages differ in terms of loss functions: in the initial stage, the negative probability of the true label is used as the loss function to compress the solution space; in subsequent stages, we introduce the Directional Probability Difference Ratio (DPDR) loss function to gradually increase the non-true labels' probability upper bound by compressing the irrelevant labels' probabilities. Experiments demonstrate that compared with previous SOTA methods, SDM not only exhibits stronger attack performance but also achieves higher attack cost-effectiveness. Additionally, SDM can be combined with adversarial training methods to enhance their defensive effects. The code is available at https://github.com/X-L-Liu/SDM.