Zhuolun Xiang

Zhuolun Xiang, Andrei Tonkikh, Alexander Spiegelman

Despite broad adoption of BFT consensus in blockchains, censorship resistance remains weak: existing designs offer limited inclusion guarantees and allow leaders to exclude transactions. We address this with a new abstraction and protocol stack. We define \emph{Prefix Consensus}, where parties input vectors and output two consistent vectors $(v^{\sf low},v^{\sf high})$ that extend the maximum common prefix of honest inputs and satisfy $v_i^{\sf low}\preceq v_j^{\sf high}$ for all honest parties $i,j$. We show that Prefix Consensus is solvable asynchronously and establish tight round-complexity bounds. We then define \emph{Strong Prefix Consensus}, which additionally requires agreement on the high output, and give a leaderless partially synchronous protocol. Using its accountable variant, we build a leaderless, multi-proposer, censorship-resistant BFT SMR protocol with amortized four-round commit latency under synchronized starts, while guaranteeing that after GST at most $f$ slots can be censored. Finally, we connect Prefix Consensus to graded consensus, obtaining a matching lower bound and a 3-round protocol, and derive leaderless Binary Consensus with improved worst-case complexity.

Zhuolun Xiang, Dahlia Malkhi, Kartik Nayak et al.

Byzantine fault tolerant (BFT) state machine replication (SMR) is an important building block for constructing permissioned blockchain systems. In contrast to Nakamoto Consensus where any block obtains higher assurance as buried deeper in the blockchain, in BFT SMR, any committed block is secure has a fixed resilience threshold. In this paper, we investigate strengthened fault tolerance (SFT) in BFT SMR under partial synchrony, which provides gradually increased resilience guarantees (like Nakamoto Consensus) during an optimistic period when the network is synchronous and the number of Byzantine faults is small. Moreover, the committed blocks can tolerate more than one-third (up to two-thirds) corruptions even after the optimistic period. Compared to the prior best solution Flexible BFT which requires quadratic message complexity, our solution maintains the linear message complexity of state-of-the-art BFT SMR protocols and requires only marginal bookkeeping overhead. We implement our solution over the open-source Diem project, and give experimental results that demonstrate its efficiency under real-world scenarios.

Qianyu Yu, Juan Villacis, Giuliano Losa et al.

Recent advances in quantum computing pose a looming threat to most current Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols, which rely on quantum-vulnerable public-key signature schemes such as Ed25519 and BLS12-381. Instead of switching to much more expensive post-quantum secure signature schemes, an alternative is to use signature-free protocols, which rely only on cheap, post-quantum secure authenticated channels. In this paper, we ask whether signature-free BFT consensus protocols can match the performance of current state-of-the-art, quantum-vulnerable BFT consensus protocols. While previous work on the Sailfish++ protocol showed that state-of-the-art throughput is attainable signature-free, the question of latency is still open. Several recent signature-free protocols have low latency in theory, but they are all very intricate, and no practical implementation has so far been presented. In this work, we propose Simple-IT, a new leader-based, signature-free BFT consensus protocol that achieves a theoretical latency of 4 message delays (one more than the optimum), and only 3 on its optimistic path. Crucially, Simple-IT is simple enough to be amenable to implementation and to practical optimizations such as speculative pipelining, and, as we show experimentally in a geo-distributed testbed, it achieves both throughput and latency competitive with state-of-the-art quantum-vulnerable protocols.

Ittai Abraham, Ling Ren, Zhuolun Xiang

This paper studies the {\em good-case latency} of {\em unauthenticated} Byzantine fault-tolerant broadcast, which measures the time it takes for all non-faulty parties to commit given a non-faulty broadcaster. For both asynchrony and synchrony, we show that $n\geq 4f$ is the tight resilience threshold that separates good-case 2 rounds and 3 rounds. For asynchronous Byzantine reliable broadcast (BRB), we also investigate the {\em bad-case latency} for all non-faulty parties to commit when the broadcaster is faulty but some non-faulty party commits. We provide matching upper and lower bounds on the resilience threshold of bad-case latency for BRB protocols with optimal good-case latency of 2 rounds. In particular, we show 2 impossibility results and propose 4 asynchronous BRB protocols.

Rati Gelashvili, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alexander Spiegelman et al.

The popularity of permissioned blockchain systems demands BFT SMR protocols that are efficient under good network conditions (synchrony) and robust under bad network conditions (asynchrony). The state-of-the-art partially synchronous BFT SMR protocols provide optimal linear communication cost per decision under synchrony and good leaders, but lose liveness under asynchrony. On the other hand, the state-of-the-art asynchronous BFT SMR protocols are live even under asynchrony, but always pay quadratic cost even under synchrony. In this paper, we propose a BFT SMR protocol that achieves the best of both worlds -- optimal linear cost per decision under good networks and leaders, optimal quadratic cost per decision under bad networks, and remains always live.

Ittai Abraham, Kartik Nayak, Ling Ren et al.

Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) state machine replication (SMR) has been studied for over 30 years. Recently it has received more attention due to its application in permissioned blockchain systems. A sequence of research efforts focuses on improving the commit latency of the SMR protocol in the common good case, including PBFT with $3$-round latency and $n\geq 3f+1$ and FaB with $2$-round latency and $n\geq 5f+1$. In this paper, we propose an authenticated protocol that solves $2$-round BFT SMR with only $n\geq 5f-1$ replicas, which refutes the optimal resiliency claim made in FaB for needing $n \geq 5f+1$ for $2$-round PBFT-style BFT protocols. For the special case when $f=1$, our protocol needs only $4$ replicas, and strictly improves PBFT by reducing the latency by one round (even when one backup is faulty).

Ittai Abraham, Kartik Nayak, Ling Ren et al.

This paper explores the problem good-case latency of Byzantine fault-tolerant broadcast, motivated by the real-world latency and performance of practical state machine replication protocols. The good-case latency measures the time it takes for all non-faulty parties to commit when the designated broadcaster is non-faulty. We provide a complete characterization of tight bounds on good-case latency, in the authenticated setting under synchrony, partial synchrony and asynchrony. Some of our new results may be surprising, e.g., 2-round PBFT-style partially synchronous Byzantine broadcast is possible if and only if $n\geq 5f-1$, and a tight bound for good-case latency under $n/3<f<n/2$ under synchrony is not an integer multiple of the delay bound.

Kartik Nayak, Ling Ren, Elaine Shi et al.

Byzantine broadcast (BB) and Byzantine agreement (BA) are two most fundamental problems and essential building blocks in distributed computing, and improving their efficiency is of interest to both theoreticians and practitioners. In this paper, we study extension protocols of BB and BA, i.e., protocols that solve BB/BA with long inputs of $l$ bits using lower costs than $l$ single-bit instances. We present new protocols with improved communication complexity in almost all settings: authenticated BA/BB with $t<n/2$, authenticated BB with $t<(1-ε)n$, unauthenticated BA/BB with $t<n/3$, and asynchronous reliable broadcast and BA with $t<n/3$. The new protocols are advantageous and significant in several aspects. First, they achieve the best-possible communication complexity of $Θ(nl)$ for wider ranges of input sizes compared to prior results. Second, the authenticated extension protocols achieve optimal communication complexity given the current best available BB/BA protocols for short messages. Third, to the best of our knowledge, our asynchronous and authenticated protocols in the setting are the first extension protocols in that setting.

Zhuolun Xiang, Bolin Ding, Xi He et al.

Local differential privacy (LDP) enables private data sharing and analytics without the need for a trusted data collector. Error-optimal primitives (for, e.g., estimating means and item frequencies) under LDP have been well studied. For analytical tasks such as range queries, however, the best known error bound is dependent on the domain size of private data, which is potentially prohibitive. This deficiency is inherent as LDP protects the same level of indistinguishability between any pair of private data values for each data downer. In this paper, we utilize an extension of $ε$-LDP called Metric-LDP or $E$-LDP, where a metric $E$ defines heterogeneous privacy guarantees for different pairs of private data values and thus provides a more flexible knob than $ε$ does to relax LDP and tune utility-privacy trade-offs. We show that, under such privacy relaxations, for analytical workloads such as linear counting, multi-dimensional range counting queries, and quantile queries, we can achieve significant gains in utility. In particular, for range queries under $E$-LDP where the metric $E$ is the $L^1$-distance function scaled by $ε$, we design mechanisms with errors independent on the domain sizes; instead, their errors depend on the metric $E$, which specifies in what granularity the private data is protected. We believe that the primitives we design for $E$-LDP will be useful in developing mechanisms for other analytical tasks, and encourage the adoption of LDP in practice.