Mithilesh Kumar Singh

Aitik Dandapat, Lalith Punepalle Raveendrareddy, Mithilesh Kumar Singh et al.

Missing data is a persistent obstacle in scientific, social science, and public health research, often biasing analyses and placing accountability on analysts for how they handle missing values. We introduce ImputeViz, an integrated visual analytics dashboard that supports diagnosing missingness, configuring imputation models, and evaluating results. The system brings together widely used methods, including MICE, Random Forest, XGBoost, and kNN, within an interactive environment that makes missingness patterns explicit. To support geospatial reasoning, we introduce gKNN, a geographically informed kNN variant that blends socioeconomic and spatial distances and exposes donor contributions, enabling provenance-based visual accountability by showing which regions drive each estimate. Our primary contribution is a method-agnostic visual analytics environment that makes cross-method comparison a first-class visual task and integrates gKNN alongside standard methods. Coordinated views reveal missingness structure through heatmaps, co-missingness summaries, and distributional diagnostics that help analysts reason about missingness patterns (MCAR/MAR) and cases where missingness may be non-random (MNAR). Users can compare and tune models and interrogate results via distributional overlays, a Method Comparison Summary reporting MAE, RMSE, Delta RMSE, and runtime for each algorithm on the current target and mask, along with variable-level discrepancy views. Cached per-method results and locked axis scales reduce cognitive overhead from shifting ranges during method switching. These comparisons highlight where methods disagree, which variables are sensitive, and how imputation choices affect downstream summaries. Case studies demonstrate how ImputeViz helps analysts select effective strategies, surface sensitive variables, and assess model robustness.

Tina Behzad, Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Anthony J. Ripa et al.

The issue of fairness in decision-making is a critical one, especially given the variety of stakeholder demands for differing and mutually incompatible versions of fairness. Adopting a strategic interaction of perspectives provides an alternative to enforcing a singular standard of fairness. We present a web-based software application, FairPlay, that enables multiple stakeholders to debias datasets collaboratively. With FairPlay, users can negotiate and arrive at a mutually acceptable outcome without a universally agreed-upon theory of fairness. In the absence of such a tool, reaching a consensus would be highly challenging due to the lack of a systematic negotiation process and the inability to modify and observe changes. We have conducted user studies that demonstrate the success of FairPlay, as users could reach a consensus within about five rounds of gameplay, illustrating the application's potential for enhancing fairness in AI systems.