Yufeng Wu

Wenhan Chang, Tianqing Zhu, Ping Xiong et al.

In the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, privacy protection has become crucial, giving rise to machine unlearning. Machine unlearning is a technique that removes specific data influences from trained models without the need for extensive retraining. However, it faces several key challenges, including accurately implementing unlearning, ensuring privacy protection during the unlearning process, and achieving effective unlearning without significantly compromising model performance. This paper presents a novel approach to machine unlearning by employing Layer-wise Relevance Analysis and Neuronal Path Perturbation. We address three primary challenges: the lack of detailed unlearning principles, privacy guarantees in zero-shot unlearning scenario, and the balance between unlearning effectiveness and model utility. Our method balances machine unlearning performance and model utility by identifying and perturbing highly relevant neurons, thereby achieving effective unlearning. By using data not present in the original training set during the unlearning process, we satisfy the zero-shot unlearning scenario and ensure robust privacy protection. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach effectively removes targeted data from the target unlearning model while maintaining the model's utility, offering a practical solution for privacy-preserving machine learning.

Yufeng Wu, Rohit Bhattacharya

A key question in many network studies is whether the observed correlations between units are primarily due to contagion or latent confounding. Here, we study this question using a segregated graph (Shpitser, 2015) representation of these mechanisms, and examine how uncertainty about the true underlying mechanism impacts downstream computation of network causal effects, particularly under full interference -- settings where we only have a single realization of a network and each unit may depend on any other unit in the network. Under certain assumptions about asymptotic growth of the network, we derive likelihood ratio tests that can be used to identify whether different sets of variables -- confounders, treatments, and outcomes -- across units exhibit dependence due to contagion or latent confounding. We then propose network causal effect estimation strategies that provide unbiased and consistent estimates if the dependence mechanisms are either known or correctly inferred using our proposed tests. Together, the proposed methods allow network effect estimation in a wider range of full interference scenarios that have not been considered in prior work. We evaluate the effectiveness of our methods with synthetic data and the validity of our assumptions using real-world networks.