Tao Yang

Anh Tran, Tao Yang, Qingyao Ai

Learning to rank systems has become an important aspect of our daily life. However, the implicit user feedback that is used to train many learning to rank models is usually noisy and suffered from user bias (i.e., position bias). Thus, obtaining an unbiased model using biased feedback has become an important research field for IR. Existing studies on unbiased learning to rank (ULTR) can be generalized into two families-algorithms that attain unbiasedness with logged data, offline learning, and algorithms that achieve unbiasedness by estimating unbiased parameters with real-time user interactions, namely online learning. While there exist many algorithms from both families, there lacks a unified way to compare and benchmark them. As a result, it can be challenging for researchers to choose the right technique for their problems or for people who are new to the field to learn and understand existing algorithms. To solve this problem, we introduced ULTRA, which is a flexible, extensible, and easily configure ULTR toolbox. Its key features include support for multiple ULTR algorithms with configurable hyperparameters, a variety of built-in click models that can be used separately to simulate clicks, different ranking model architecture and evaluation metrics, and simple learning to rank pipeline creation. In this paper, we discuss the general framework of ULTR, briefly describe the algorithms in ULTRA, detailed the structure, and pipeline of the toolbox. We experimented on all the algorithms supported by ultra and showed that the toolbox performance is reasonable. Our toolbox is an important resource for researchers to conduct experiments on ULTR algorithms with different configurations as well as testing their own algorithms with the supported features.

Qingyao Ai, Tao Yang, Huazheng Wang et al.

How to obtain an unbiased ranking model by learning to rank with biased user feedback is an important research question for IR. Existing work on unbiased learning to rank (ULTR) can be broadly categorized into two groups -- the studies on unbiased learning algorithms with logged data, namely the \textit{offline} unbiased learning, and the studies on unbiased parameters estimation with real-time user interactions, namely the \textit{online} learning to rank. While their definitions of \textit{unbiasness} are different, these two types of ULTR algorithms share the same goal -- to find the best models that rank documents based on their intrinsic relevance or utility. However, most studies on offline and online unbiased learning to rank are carried in parallel without detailed comparisons on their background theories and empirical performance. In this paper, we formalize the task of unbiased learning to rank and show that existing algorithms for offline unbiased learning and online learning to rank are just the two sides of the same coin. We evaluate six state-of-the-art ULTR algorithms and find that most of them can be used in both offline settings and online environments with or without minor modifications. Further, we analyze how different offline and online learning paradigms would affect the theoretical foundation and empirical effectiveness of each algorithm on both synthetic and real search data. Our findings could provide important insights and guideline for choosing and deploying ULTR algorithms in practice.