Seoyeon Choi

h-index13
2papers

2 Papers

30.7ROMay 13
MIMIC-D: Multi-modal Imitation for MultI-agent Coordination with Decentralized Diffusion Policies

Dayi Dong, Maulik Bhatt, Seoyeon Choi et al.

As robots become more integrated in society, their ability to coordinate with other robots and humans on multi-modal tasks (those with multiple valid solutions) is crucial. Such behaviors can be learned from expert demonstrations via imitation learning (IL), but when expert demonstrations are multi-modal, standard IL approaches usually average across modes or collapse to a single mode, preventing effective coordination. Being inspired by diffusion models' ability to capture complex multi-modal trajectory distributions in single-agent settings, we develop a diffusion-based framework for coordinated multi-modal behavior in multi-agent systems. However, existing multi-agent diffusion approaches typically require a centralized planner or explicit communication among agents. This assumption can fail in real-world scenarios where robots must operate independently or with agents like humans that they cannot directly communicate with. Therefore, we propose MIMIC-D, a joint training with decentralized execution paradigm for multi-modal multi-agent IL via diffusion. We jointly train all agents' policies with only local information to achieve implicit coordination. In simulation and hardware experiments, our method exhibits robust multi-modal coordination behavior in various tasks and environments, improving upon state-of-the-art baselines.

CLFeb 16
Overthinking Loops in Agents: A Structural Risk via MCP Tools

Yohan Lee, Jisoo Jang, Seoyeon Choi et al.

Tool-using LLM agents increasingly coordinate real workloads by selecting and chaining third-party tools based on text-visible metadata such as tool names, descriptions, and return messages. We show that this convenience creates a supply-chain attack surface: a malicious MCP tool server can be co-registered alongside normal tools and induce overthinking loops, where individually trivial or plausible tool calls compose into cyclic trajectories that inflate end-to-end tokens and latency without any single step looking abnormal. We formalize this as a structural overthinking attack, distinguishable from token-level verbosity, and implement 14 malicious tools across three servers that trigger repetition, forced refinement, and distraction. Across heterogeneous registries and multiple tool-capable models, the attack causes severe resource amplification (up to $142.4\times$ tokens) and can degrade task outcomes. Finally, we find that decoding-time concision controls do not reliably prevent loop induction, suggesting defenses should reason about tool-call structure rather than tokens alone.