Manuel R. Ciosici

Marcos Treviso, Ji-Ung Lee, Tianchu Ji et al. · uw

Recent work in natural language processing (NLP) has yielded appealing results from scaling model parameters and training data; however, using only scale to improve performance means that resource consumption also grows. Such resources include data, time, storage, or energy, all of which are naturally limited and unevenly distributed. This motivates research into efficient methods that require fewer resources to achieve similar results. This survey synthesizes and relates current methods and findings in efficient NLP. We aim to provide both guidance for conducting NLP under limited resources, and point towards promising research directions for developing more efficient methods.

Amin Karimi Monsefi, Nikhil Bhendawade, Manuel Rafael Ciosici et al.

Autoregressive language models (ARMs) deliver strong likelihoods, but are inherently serial: they generate one token per forward pass, which limits throughput and inflates latency for long sequences. Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) parallelize across positions and thus appear promising for language generation, yet standard discrete diffusion typically needs hundreds to thousands of model evaluations to reach high quality, trading serial depth for iterative breadth. We introduce FS-DFM, Few-Step Discrete Flow-Matching. A discrete flow-matching model designed for speed without sacrificing quality. The core idea is simple: make the number of sampling steps an explicit parameter and train the model to be consistent across step budgets, so one big move lands where many small moves would. We pair this with a reliable update rule that moves probability in the right direction without overshooting, and with strong teacher guidance distilled from long-run trajectories. Together, these choices make few-step sampling stable, accurate, and easy to control. On language modeling benchmarks, FS-DFM with 8 sampling steps achieves perplexity parity with a 1,024-step discrete-flow baseline for generating 1,024 tokens using a similar-size model, delivering up to 128 times faster sampling and corresponding latency/throughput gains. Code & pretrained checkpoints: https://github.com/apple/ml-fs-dfm

Manuel R. Ciosici, Leon Derczynski

Training large neural language models on large datasets is resource- and time-intensive. These requirements create a barrier to entry, where those with fewer resources cannot build competitive models. This paper presents various techniques for making it possible to (a) train a large language model using resources that a modest research lab might have, and (b) train it in a reasonable amount of time. We provide concrete recommendations for practitioners, which we illustrate with a case study: a T5 model for Danish, the first for this language.

Manuel R. Ciosici, Alex Hedges, Yash Kankanampati et al.

We explore using a moderately sized large language model (GPT-J 6B parameters) to create a plan for a simulated robot to achieve 30 classes of goals in ScienceWorld, a text game simulator for elementary science experiments. Previously published empirical work claimed that large language models (LLMs) are a poor fit (Wang et al., 2022) compared to reinforcement learning. Using the Markov assumption (a single previous step), the LLM outperforms the reinforcement learning-based approach by a factor of 1.4. When we fill the LLM's input buffer with as many prior steps as possible, improvement rises to 3.5x. Even when training on only 6.5% of the training data, we observe a 2.2x improvement over the reinforcement-learning-based approach. Our experiments show that performance varies widely across the 30 classes of actions, indicating that averaging over tasks can hide significant performance issues. In work contemporaneous with ours, Lin et al. (2023) demonstrated a two-part approach (SwiftSage) that uses a small LLM (T5-large) complemented by OpenAI's massive LLMs to achieve outstanding results in ScienceWorld. Our 6-B parameter, single-stage GPT-J matches the performance of SwiftSage's two-stage architecture when it incorporates GPT-3.5 turbo which has 29-times more parameters than GPT-J.

Mads Toftrup, Søren Asger Sørensen, Manuel R. Ciosici et al.

Language Identification is the task of identifying a document's language. For applications like automatic spell checker selection, language identification must use very short strings such as text message fragments. In this work, we reproduce a language identification architecture that Apple briefly sketched in a blog post. We confirm the bi-LSTM model's performance and find that it outperforms current open-source language identifiers. We further find that its language identification mistakes are due to confusion between related languages.

Manuel R. Ciosici, Joe Cecil, Alex Hedges et al.

Our goal is to deliver a new task and leaderboard to stimulate research on question answering and pre-trained language models (PTLMs) to understand a significant instructional document, e.g., an introductory college textbook or a manual. PTLMs have shown great success in many question-answering tasks, given significant supervised training, but much less so in zero-shot settings. We propose a new task that includes two college-level introductory texts in the social sciences (American Government 2e) and humanities (U.S. History), hundreds of true/false statements based on review questions written by the textbook authors, validation/development tests based on the first eight chapters of the textbooks, blind tests based on the remaining textbook chapters, and baseline results given state-of-the-art PTLMs. Since the questions are balanced, random performance should be ~50%. T5, fine-tuned with BoolQ achieves the same performance, suggesting that the textbook's content is not pre-represented in the PTLM. Taking the exam closed book, but having read the textbook (i.e., adding the textbook to T5's pre-training), yields at best minor improvement (56%), suggesting that the PTLM may not have "understood" the textbook (or perhaps misunderstood the questions). Performance is better (~60%) when the exam is taken open-book (i.e., allowing the machine to automatically retrieve a paragraph and use it to answer the question).

Manuel R. Ciosici, Joseph Cummings, Mitchell DeHaven et al.

We describe Machine-Aided Script Curator (MASC), a system for human-machine collaborative script authoring. Scripts produced with MASC include (1) English descriptions of sub-events that comprise a larger, complex event; (2) event types for each of those events; (3) a record of entities expected to participate in multiple sub-events; and (4) temporal sequencing between the sub-events. MASC automates portions of the script creation process with suggestions for event types, links to Wikidata, and sub-events that may have been forgotten. We illustrate how these automations are useful to the script writer with a few case-study scripts.

Leon Strømberg-Derczynski, Manuel R. Ciosici, Rebekah Baglini et al.

Danish language technology has been hindered by a lack of broad-coverage corpora at the scale modern NLP prefers. This paper describes the Danish Gigaword Corpus, the result of a focused effort to provide a diverse and freely-available one billion word corpus of Danish text. The Danish Gigaword corpus covers a wide array of time periods, domains, speakers' socio-economic status, and Danish dialects.

Manuel Ciosici, Tobias Sommer, Ira Assent

Abbreviations often have several distinct meanings, often making their use in text ambiguous. Expanding them to their intended meaning in context is important for Machine Reading tasks such as document search, recommendation and question answering. Existing approaches mostly rely on manually labeled examples of abbreviations and their correct long-forms. Such data sets are costly to create and result in trained models with limited applicability and flexibility. Importantly, most current methods must be subjected to a full empirical evaluation in order to understand their limitations, which is cumbersome in practice. In this paper, we present an entirely unsupervised abbreviation disambiguation method (called UAD) that picks up abbreviation definitions from unstructured text. Creating distinct tokens per meaning, we learn context representations as word vectors. We demonstrate how to further boost abbreviation disambiguation performance by obtaining better context representations using additional unstructured text. Our method is the first abbreviation disambiguation approach with a transparent model that allows performance analysis without requiring full-scale evaluation, making it highly relevant for real-world deployments. In our thorough empirical evaluation, UAD achieves high performance on large real-world data sets from different domains and outperforms both baseline and state-of-the-art methods. UAD scales well and supports thousands of abbreviations with multiple different meanings within a single model. In order to spur more research into abbreviation disambiguation, we publish a new data set, that we also use in our experiments.

Manuel R. Ciosici

Brown clustering is a hard, hierarchical, bottom-up clustering of words in a vocabulary. Words are assigned to clusters based on their usage pattern in a given corpus. The resulting clusters and hierarchical structure can be used in constructing class-based language models and for generating features to be used in NLP tasks. Because of its high computational cost, the most-used version of Brown clustering is a greedy algorithm that uses a window to restrict its search space. Like other clustering algorithms, Brown clustering finds a sub-optimal, but nonetheless effective, mapping of words to clusters. Because of its ability to produce high-quality, human-understandable cluster, Brown clustering has seen high uptake the NLP research community where it is used in the preprocessing and feature generation steps. Little research has been done towards improving the quality of Brown clusters, despite the greedy and heuristic nature of the algorithm. The approaches tried so far have focused on: studying the effect of the initialisation in a similar algorithm; tuning the parameters used to define the desired number of clusters and the behaviour of the algorithm; and including a separate parameter to differentiate the window from the desired number of clusters. However, some of these approaches have not yielded significant improvements in cluster quality. In this thesis, a close analysis of the Brown algorithm is provided, revealing important under-specifications and weaknesses in the original algorithm. These have serious effects on cluster quality and reproducibility of research using Brown clustering. In the second part of the thesis, two modifications are proposed. Finally, a thorough evaluation is performed, considering both the optimization criterion of Brown clustering and the performance of the resulting class-based language models.