P. Kumar

RO
h-index13
4papers
29citations
Novelty54%
AI Score24

4 Papers

3.0ROFeb 1, 2021
A Novel Collision Detection and Avoidance system for Midvehicle using Offset-based Curvilinear Motion

N. Prabhakaran, P. M. Balasubramaniam, P. Ranjith Kumar et al.

Major cause of midvehicle collision is due to the distraction of drivers in both the Front and rear-end vehicle witnessed in dense traffic and high speed road conditions. In view of this scenario, a crash detection and collision avoidance algorithm coined as Midvehicle Collision Detection and Avoidance System (MCDAS) is proposed to evade the possible crash at both ends of the host vehicle. The method based upon Constant Velocity (CV) model specifically, addresses two scenarios, the first scenario encompasses two sub-scenario namely, a) A rear-end collision avoidance mechanism that accelerates the host vehicle under no front-end vehicle condition and b) Curvilinear motion based on front and host vehicle offset (position), whilst, the other scenario deals with parallel parking issues. The offset based curvilinear motion of the host vehicle plays a vital role in threat avoidance from the front-end vehicle. A desired curvilinear strategy on left and right sides is achieved by the host vehicle with concern of possible CV to avoid both end collisions. In this methodology, path constraint is applicable for both scenarios with required direction. Monte Carlo analysis of MCDAS covering vehicle kinematics demonstrated acute discrimination with consistent performance for the collision validated on simulated with real-time data.

1.2SYOct 13, 2018
Towards Provably Safe Mixed Transportation Systems with Human-driven and Automated Vehicles

Xi Liu, Ke Ma, P. R. Kumar

Currently, we are in an environment where the fraction of automated vehicles is negligibly small. We anticipate that this fraction will increase in coming decades before if ever, we have a fully automated transportation system. Motivated by this we address the problem of provable safety of mixed traffic consisting of both intelligent vehicles (IVs) as well as human-driven vehicles (HVs). An important issue that arises is that such mixed systems may well have lesser throughput than all human traffic systems if the automated vehicles are expected to remain provably safe with respect to human traffic. This necessitates the consideration of strategies such as platooning of automated vehicles in order to increase the throughput. In this paper, we address the design of provably safe systems consisting of a mix of automated and human-driven vehicles including the use of platooning by automated vehicles. We design motion planing policies and coordination rules for participants in this novel mixed system. HVs are considered as nearsighted and modeled with relatively loose constraints, while IVs are considered as capable of following much tighter constraints. HVs are expected to follow reasonable and simple rules. IVs are designed to move under a model predictive control (MPC) based motion plans and coordination protocols. Our contribution of this paper is in showing how to integrate these two types of models safely into a mixed system. System safety is proved in single lane scenarios, as well as in multi-lane situations allowing lane changes.

6.7ROMay 26, 2017
Near-Optimal Belief Space Planning via T-LQG

Mohammadhussein Rafieisakhaei, Suman Chakravorty, P. R. Kumar

We consider the problem of planning under observation and motion uncertainty for nonlinear robotics systems. Determining the optimal solution to this problem, generally formulated as a Partially Observed Markov Decision Process (POMDP), is computationally intractable. We propose a Trajectory-optimized Linear Quadratic Gaussian (T-LQG) approach that leads to quantifiably near-optimal solutions for the POMDP problem. We provide a novel "separation principle" for the design of an optimal nominal open-loop trajectory followed by an optimal feedback control law, which provides a near-optimal feedback control policy for belief space planning problems involving a polynomial order of calculations of minimum order.

6.7ROMay 5, 2016
Non-Gaussian SLAP: Simultaneous Localization and Planning Under Non-Gaussian Uncertainty in Static and Dynamic Environments

Mohammadhussein Rafieisakhaei, Suman Chakravorty, P. R. Kumar

Simultaneous Localization and Planning (SLAP) under process and measurement uncertainties is a challenge. It involves solving a stochastic control problem modeled as a Partially Observed Markov Decision Process (POMDP) in a general framework. For a convex environment, we propose an optimization-based open-loop optimal control problem coupled with receding horizon control strategy to plan for high quality trajectories along which the uncertainty of the state localization is reduced while the system reaches to a goal state with minimum control effort. In a static environment with non-convex state constraints, the optimization is modified by defining barrier functions to obtain collision-free paths while maintaining the previous goals. By initializing the optimization with trajectories in different homotopy classes and comparing the resultant costs, we improve the quality of the solution in the presence of action and measurement uncertainties. In dynamic environments with time-varying constraints such as moving obstacles or banned areas, the approach is extended to find collision-free trajectories. In this paper, the underlying spaces are continuous, and beliefs are non-Gaussian. Without obstacles, the optimization is a globally convex problem, while in the presence of obstacles it becomes locally convex. We demonstrate the performance of the method on different scenarios.