Zihan Zhang

LG
h-index4
7papers
165citations
Novelty77%
AI Score37

7 Papers

26.1LGJul 25, 2023
Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learning

Zihan Zhang, Yuxin Chen, Jason D. Lee et al.

A central issue lying at the heart of online reinforcement learning (RL) is data efficiency. While a number of recent works achieved asymptotically minimal regret in online RL, the optimality of these results is only guaranteed in a ``large-sample'' regime, imposing enormous burn-in cost in order for their algorithms to operate optimally. How to achieve minimax-optimal regret without incurring any burn-in cost has been an open problem in RL theory. We settle this problem for the context of finite-horizon inhomogeneous Markov decision processes. Specifically, we prove that a modified version of Monotonic Value Propagation (MVP), a model-based algorithm proposed by \cite{zhang2020reinforcement}, achieves a regret on the order of (modulo log factors) \begin{equation*} \min\big\{ \sqrt{SAH^3K}, \,HK \big\}, \end{equation*} where $S$ is the number of states, $A$ is the number of actions, $H$ is the planning horizon, and $K$ is the total number of episodes. This regret matches the minimax lower bound for the entire range of sample size $K\geq 1$, essentially eliminating any burn-in requirement. It also translates to a PAC sample complexity (i.e., the number of episodes needed to yield $\varepsilon$-accuracy) of $\frac{SAH^3}{\varepsilon^2}$ up to log factor, which is minimax-optimal for the full $\varepsilon$-range. Further, we extend our theory to unveil the influences of problem-dependent quantities like the optimal value/cost and certain variances. The key technical innovation lies in the development of a new regret decomposition strategy and a novel analysis paradigm to decouple complicated statistical dependency -- a long-standing challenge facing the analysis of online RL in the sample-hungry regime.

16.8MLJul 31, 2023
Classification with Deep Neural Networks and Logistic Loss

Zihan Zhang, Lei Shi, Ding-Xuan Zhou

Deep neural networks (DNNs) trained with the logistic loss (i.e., the cross entropy loss) have made impressive advancements in various binary classification tasks. However, generalization analysis for binary classification with DNNs and logistic loss remains scarce. The unboundedness of the target function for the logistic loss is the main obstacle to deriving satisfactory generalization bounds. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by establishing a novel and elegant oracle-type inequality, which enables us to deal with the boundedness restriction of the target function, and using it to derive sharp convergence rates for fully connected ReLU DNN classifiers trained with logistic loss. In particular, we obtain optimal convergence rates (up to log factors) only requiring the Hölder smoothness of the conditional class probability $η$ of data. Moreover, we consider a compositional assumption that requires $η$ to be the composition of several vector-valued functions of which each component function is either a maximum value function or a Hölder smooth function only depending on a small number of its input variables. Under this assumption, we derive optimal convergence rates (up to log factors) which are independent of the input dimension of data. This result explains why DNN classifiers can perform well in practical high-dimensional classification problems. Besides the novel oracle-type inequality, the sharp convergence rates given in our paper also owe to a tight error bound for approximating the natural logarithm function near zero (where it is unbounded) by ReLU DNNs. In addition, we justify our claims for the optimality of rates by proving corresponding minimax lower bounds. All these results are new in the literature and will deepen our theoretical understanding of classification with DNNs.

20.4LGJun 28, 2023
Sharper Model-free Reinforcement Learning for Average-reward Markov Decision Processes

Zihan Zhang, Qiaomin Xie

We develop several provably efficient model-free reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for infinite-horizon average-reward Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We consider both online setting and the setting with access to a simulator. In the online setting, we propose model-free RL algorithms based on reference-advantage decomposition. Our algorithm achieves $\widetilde{O}(S^5A^2\mathrm{sp}(h^*)\sqrt{T})$ regret after $T$ steps, where $S\times A$ is the size of state-action space, and $\mathrm{sp}(h^*)$ the span of the optimal bias function. Our results are the first to achieve optimal dependence in $T$ for weakly communicating MDPs. In the simulator setting, we propose a model-free RL algorithm that finds an $ε$-optimal policy using $\widetilde{O} \left(\frac{SA\mathrm{sp}^2(h^*)}{ε^2}+\frac{S^2A\mathrm{sp}(h^*)}ε \right)$ samples, whereas the minimax lower bound is $Ω\left(\frac{SA\mathrm{sp}(h^*)}{ε^2}\right)$. Our results are based on two new techniques that are unique in the average-reward setting: 1) better discounted approximation by value-difference estimation; 2) efficient construction of confidence region for the optimal bias function with space complexity $O(SA)$.

12.5LGMar 15, 2024
Horizon-Free Regret for Linear Markov Decision Processes

Zihan Zhang, Jason D. Lee, Yuxin Chen et al.

A recent line of works showed regret bounds in reinforcement learning (RL) can be (nearly) independent of planning horizon, a.k.a.~the horizon-free bounds. However, these regret bounds only apply to settings where a polynomial dependency on the size of transition model is allowed, such as tabular Markov Decision Process (MDP) and linear mixture MDP. We give the first horizon-free bound for the popular linear MDP setting where the size of the transition model can be exponentially large or even uncountable. In contrast to prior works which explicitly estimate the transition model and compute the inhomogeneous value functions at different time steps, we directly estimate the value functions and confidence sets. We obtain the horizon-free bound by: (1) maintaining multiple weighted least square estimators for the value functions; and (2) a structural lemma which shows the maximal total variation of the inhomogeneous value functions is bounded by a polynomial factor of the feature dimension.

18.2LGJun 3, 2024
Achieving Tractable Minimax Optimal Regret in Average Reward MDPs

Victor Boone, Zihan Zhang

In recent years, significant attention has been directed towards learning average-reward Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). However, existing algorithms either suffer from sub-optimal regret guarantees or computational inefficiencies. In this paper, we present the first tractable algorithm with minimax optimal regret of $\widetilde{\mathrm{O}}(\sqrt{\mathrm{sp}(h^*) S A T})$, where $\mathrm{sp}(h^*)$ is the span of the optimal bias function $h^*$, $S \times A$ is the size of the state-action space and $T$ the number of learning steps. Remarkably, our algorithm does not require prior information on $\mathrm{sp}(h^*)$. Our algorithm relies on a novel subroutine, Projected Mitigated Extended Value Iteration (PMEVI), to compute bias-constrained optimal policies efficiently. This subroutine can be applied to various previous algorithms to improve regret bounds.

7.5LGOct 15, 2021
Almost Optimal Batch-Regret Tradeoff for Batch Linear Contextual Bandits

Zihan Zhang, Xiangyang Ji, Yuan Zhou

We study the optimal batch-regret tradeoff for batch linear contextual bandits. For any batch number $M$, number of actions $K$, time horizon $T$, and dimension $d$, we provide an algorithm and prove its regret guarantee, which, due to technical reasons, features a two-phase expression as the time horizon $T$ grows. We also prove a lower bound theorem that surprisingly shows the optimality of our two-phase regret upper bound (up to logarithmic factors) in the \emph{full range} of the problem parameters, therefore establishing the exact batch-regret tradeoff. Compared to the recent work \citep{ruan2020linear} which showed that $M = O(\log \log T)$ batches suffice to achieve the asymptotically minimax-optimal regret without the batch constraints, our algorithm is simpler and easier for practical implementation. Furthermore, our algorithm achieves the optimal regret for all $T \geq d$, while \citep{ruan2020linear} requires that $T$ greater than an unrealistically large polynomial of $d$. Along our analysis, we also prove a new matrix concentration inequality with dependence on their dynamic upper bounds, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first of its kind in literature and maybe of independent interest.

18.1LGOct 12, 2020
Nearly Minimax Optimal Reward-free Reinforcement Learning

Zihan Zhang, Simon S. Du, Xiangyang Ji

We study the reward-free reinforcement learning framework, which is particularly suitable for batch reinforcement learning and scenarios where one needs policies for multiple reward functions. This framework has two phases. In the exploration phase, the agent collects trajectories by interacting with the environment without using any reward signal. In the planning phase, the agent needs to return a near-optimal policy for arbitrary reward functions. We give a new efficient algorithm, \textbf{S}taged \textbf{S}ampling + \textbf{T}runcated \textbf{P}lanning (\algoname), which interacts with the environment at most $O\left( \frac{S^2A}{ε^2}\text{poly}\log\left(\frac{SAH}ε\right) \right)$ episodes in the exploration phase, and guarantees to output a near-optimal policy for arbitrary reward functions in the planning phase. Here, $S$ is the size of state space, $A$ is the size of action space, $H$ is the planning horizon, and $ε$ is the target accuracy relative to the total reward. Notably, our sample complexity scales only \emph{logarithmically} with $H$, in contrast to all existing results which scale \emph{polynomially} with $H$. Furthermore, this bound matches the minimax lower bound $Ω\left(\frac{S^2A}{ε^2}\right)$ up to logarithmic factors. Our results rely on three new techniques : 1) A new sufficient condition for the dataset to plan for an $ε$-suboptimal policy; 2) A new way to plan efficiently under the proposed condition using soft-truncated planning; 3) Constructing extended MDP to maximize the truncated accumulative rewards efficiently.