Ehsan Yousefzadeh-Asl-Miandoab

Ehsan Yousefzadeh-Asl-Miandoab, Reza Karimzadeh, Danyal Yorulmaz et al.

Collocating deep learning training tasks improves GPU utilization but risks resource contention, severe slowdowns, and out-of-memory (OOM) failures. Accurate memory estimation is essential for robust collocation, and GPU utilization estimation -- a key proxy for contention -- enables interference-aware scheduling. Existing GPU memory estimators span three paradigms -- analytical models, CPU-side libraries, and ML-based estimators -- each with distinct limitations: dependence on detailed model specifications, intrusive integration, poor generalization, and varying latency overhead. GPU heterogeneity further complicates estimation, as identical tasks can exhibit different memory footprints across hardware generations. GPU utilization remains comparatively understudied, further complicated by non-additive utilization metrics and GPU heterogeneity. We conduct a systematic analysis of representative estimators from each paradigm -- Horus, PyTorch FakeTensor, and our lightweight ML-based estimator -- evaluating accuracy, generalizability, and overhead. We construct a synthetic dataset spanning MLPs, CNNs, and Transformers with controlled architectural variations, and train MLP- and Transformer-based estimators for memory prediction, and experiment with utilization estimation. Our evaluation reveals key tradeoffs and validates estimators against real-world unseen models. Significant challenges remain: analytical models lack generalization and cannot easily be extended to new GPU architectures or accurately reflect memory optimization savings; CPU-side libraries impose intrusive integration overhead; and both analytical and ML-based estimators rely on model specifications or computation graphs, limiting generalization across diverse architectures and hardware variants. We release all datasets, tools, and artifacts to support further research.

Ties Robroek, Ehsan Yousefzadeh-Asl-Miandoab, Pınar Tözün

Deep learning training is an expensive process that extensively uses GPUs, but not all model training saturates modern powerful GPUs. Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) is a new technology introduced by NVIDIA that can partition a GPU to better-fit workloads that do not require all the memory and compute resources of a full GPU. In this paper, we examine the performance of a MIG-enabled A100 GPU under deep learning workloads containing various sizes and combinations of models. We contrast the benefits of MIG to older workload collocation methods on GPUs: naïvely submitting multiple processes on the same GPU and utilizing Multi-Process Service (MPS). Our results demonstrate that collocating multiple model training runs may yield significant benefits. In certain cases, it can lead up to four times training throughput despite increased epoch time. On the other hand, the aggregate memory footprint and compute needs of the models trained in parallel must fit the available memory and compute resources of the GPU. MIG can be beneficial thanks to its interference-free partitioning, especially when the sizes of the models align with the MIG partitioning options. MIG's rigid partitioning, however, may create sub-optimal GPU utilization for more dynamic mixed workloads. In general, we recommend MPS as the best performing and most flexible form of collocation for model training for a single user submitting training jobs.

Ehsan Yousefzadeh-Asl-Miandoab, Reza Karimzadeh, Bulat Ibragimov et al.

GPUs running deep learning (DL) workloads are frequently underutilized. Collocating multiple DL training tasks on the same GPU can improve utilization but introduces two key risks: (1) out-of-memory (OOM) crashes for newly scheduled tasks, and (2) severe performance interference among co-running tasks, which can negate any throughput gains. These issues reduce system robustness, quality of service, and energy efficiency. We present CARMA, a task-level, collocation-aware resource management system for the server-scale. CARMA addresses collocation challenges via (1) fine-grained monitoring and bookkeeping of GPUs and a collocation risk analysis that filters out the high-risk GPUs; (2) task placement policies that cap GPU utilization to avoid OOMs and limit interference; (3) integration of GPU memory need estimators for DL tasks to minimize OOMs during collocation; and (4) a lightweight recovery method that relaunches jobs crashed due to OOMs. Our evaluation on a DL training workload derived from real-world traces shows that CARMA uses GPUs more efficiently by making more informed collocation decisions: for the best-performing collocation policy, CARMA increases GPU streaming multiprocessor (SM) utilization by 54%, the parallelism achieved per SM by 61%, and memory use by 62%. This results in a $\sim$35% and $\sim$15% reduction in the end-to-end execution time (makespan) and GPU energy consumption, respectively, for this workload.