Élisabeth Murisasco

Xavier Daull, Patrice Bellot, Emmanuel Bruno et al.

This paper reviews the state-of-the-art of large language models (LLM) architectures and strategies for "complex" question-answering with a focus on hybrid architectures. LLM based chatbot services have allowed anyone to grasp the potential of LLM to solve many common problems, but soon discovered their limitations for complex questions. Addressing more specific, complex questions (e.g., "What is the best mix of power-generation methods to reduce climate change ?") often requires specialized architectures, domain knowledge, new skills, decomposition and multi-step resolution, deep reasoning, sensitive data protection, explainability, and human-in-the-loop processes. Therefore, we review: (1) necessary skills and tasks for handling complex questions and common LLM limits to overcome; (2) dataset, cost functions and evaluation metrics for measuring and improving (e.g. accuracy, explainability, fairness, robustness, groundedness, faithfulness, toxicity...); (3) family of solutions to overcome LLM limitations by (a) training and reinforcement (b) hybridization, (c) prompting, (d) agentic-architectures (agents, tools) and extended reasoning.

Daull Xavier, Patrice Bellot, Emmanuel Bruno et al.

We introduce CollabToolBuilder, a flexible multiagent LLM framework with expert-in-the-loop (HITL) guidance that iteratively learns to create tools for a target goal, aligning with human intent and process, while minimizing time for task/domain adaptation effort and human feedback capture. The architecture generates and validates tools via four specialized agents (Coach, Coder, Critic, Capitalizer) using a reinforced dynamic prompt and systematic human feedback integration to reinforce each agent's role toward goals and constraints. This work is best viewed as a system-level integration and methodology combining multi-agent in-context learning, HITL controls, and reusable tool capitalization for complex iterative problems such as scientific document generation. We illustrate it with preliminary experiments (e.g., generating state-of-the-art research papers or patents given an abstract) and discuss its applicability to other iterative problem-solving.

Patrice Bellot, Lerch Soëlie, Bruno Emmanuel et al.

Consumers are used to consulting posted reviews on the Internet before buying a product. But it's difficult to know the global opinion considering the important number of those reviews. Sentiment analysis afford detecting polarity (positive, negative, neutral) in a expressed opinion and therefore classifying those reviews. Our purpose is to determine the influence of emotions on the polarity of books reviews. We define "bag-of-words" representation models of reviews which use a lexicon containing emotional (anticipation, sadness, fear, anger, joy, surprise, trust, disgust) and sentimental (positive, negative) words. This lexicon afford measuring felt emotions types by readers. The implemented supervised learning used is a Random Forest type. The application concerns Amazon platform's reviews. Mots-cl{é}s : Analyse de sentiments, Analyse d'{é}motions (texte), Classification de polarit{é} de sentiments